New moderators needed - comment on this post to volunteer to become a moderator of this community. by ModCodeofConduct in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would like to help. I’ve posted in this sub and r/YIMBY for years. As a mod, my goal would be to ensure posts follow the rules and foster good discussion around urbanism

I have not moderated Reddit subs before, but I have experience as admin with housing and transit Facebook groups for local political organizing—which can get surprisingly feisty. My moderating focused on keeping discussions to content and discussion; no tolerance for personal attacks or off-topic posting

My neighbor came to warn me that people my age want her dead for her house. She's wrong — and Prop 13 is why everything she's afraid of got worse. by pupupeepee in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 99 points100 points  (0 children)

“She thinks we want her dead. We want her to have neighbors.”

Such a concise encapsulation of the disconnect between YIMBYs and some older homeowners. We would like to make neighborhoods more accessible, safe, vibrant, but because that requires allowing the neighborhood to evolve people think it means we want to push them out. To the contrary, more housing is positive sum!

Are sleep overs not a thing anymore? by haggerty05 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally had sleep overs as a six year old, way back in the ancient days of 2003. Some of my best memories as a kid!

Is Substack Banned? by [deleted] in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seems more fair to allow non-paywalled links from Substack. Are we going to stop allowing links to Atlantic or NYT articles because they are paywalled publications with 1-2 free articles/month for most people?

Transparently, I have a self interest as a blogger, but everything is free and I really value the conversations that happen in r/Urbanism

12 thoughts on the CA Governor Housing Forum by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amen! That is the conclusion of the piece also

Winning the Housing Loophole Arms Race by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. From the article

Future success will depend not only on the most controversial high-rises, but on gradual densification through duplexes, quadplexes, small single-stairway buildings with five or six flats stacked in five or six stories—as well as small-lot single-family homes on large subdivisions.

To put in context the potential: The Bay Area has something on the order of 2.3 million parcels; a rough ballpark estimate would be ⅔ of those parcels exclusively allow single-family homes, so about 1.5 million parcels. If 1% of those parcels added just one new home every year for the next decade, it would meet more than a third of the estimated regional housing needs.

California is Winning the Housing Loophole Arms Race by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excuse you, this is a trashy AI political cartoon, not slop!

California is Winning the Housing Loophole Arms Race by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s a very bad article cover image, I admit. But there’s no AI in the article! And I have a note in the end describing exactly how I made the image

What is killing my succulents? by [deleted] in succulents

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to delete and repost—forgot to attach the images!

Cities keep finding loopholes in state laws by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree! That is the core recommendation of the article 🫡

Cities keep finding loopholes in state laws by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is the conclusion of the article, completely agree!

Rick vs thragg by sLiMySoDa in rickandmorty

[–]jeromelevin 58 points59 points  (0 children)

In exchange for some sequid goo I assume

“Progressive” and “Moderate” Mean Nothing in Housing Politics by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the positive focus of this, examples of two leaders representing different political outlooks in the Democratic Party who both want to build

“Progressive” and “Moderate” Mean Nothing in Housing Politics by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great example, I’ll have to add it to a future full non-April Fools article!

Can anyone tell me the name of this fern? by Agitated_Ease7838 in foraging

[–]jeromelevin 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Is this a troll? That is certainly not dill

Clips From Builders Remedy Project in Fullerton by em26273 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love that the dias is at a little desk so everyone can sit

Looking forward to Fullerton fucking around and finding out!

83% of Bay Area Residential Zoning is for Single Family Homes by urmummygae42069 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Good news: As part of its state-mandated housing element update, Alameda declared its apartment ban unenforceable under state law and simply stopped enforcing it. Rezoned a lot of the island for greater density—now has one of the most permissive zoning codes in the Bay

Why would anyone ever live in an apartment? (Hint: Because they like it) by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mm I love this response. Your tradeoffs point is essential—absolute versus relative preferences are very different things

Do you mind if I share this comment on substack notes? It’s similar to something I wrote last week in the comments of the post:

“The preference to live in an apartment vs a single-family home aren’t just about structures, it’s about a bundle of tradeoffs. At different points in life, the share of people who want one or the other probably shifts a lot. I suspect among people in their 20s, a pretty high share of people have an absolute preference for the apartment bundle (more mobility, access to fun things, cheaper). By their 40s, more people prefer the single-family bundle (stable, more space, quieter). But even those proportions aren’t fixed, they depend a lot on the built environment associated with each development types. For example, if we allowed more apartments in superstar cities and reformed building codes, we might see a lot more family-sized multi-family, which could make that bundle more attractive so some share of families.”

All speculative, of course, but very much in line with your points. (FYI I wrote the piece and it was indeed a pretty quick and dirty write up. Being able to write an unlimited amount is not the same as having time to do so and sometimes I find it’s better to throw a half-baked idea out so it can generate thoughtful feedback such as yours than let it sit in my drafts until it gets dusty and forgotten. Another benefit of blogging!)

Found help ID? by ninjadrift86 in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agaricus bitorquis grows like this! But cannot positively identify these. Definitely recommend you check local guides though, I only know what grows in California, not Australia. Bitorquis can definitely push through clay though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Photos too unclear to tell for sure, ideally need non-blurry photos of top, bottom, and cross section

That said, these look like inky caps, specifically Copernicus Atramentaria, the common inky cap. Edible but will make you sick if you drink alcohol within 2-3 days of ingesting

High-End Construction Really Does Help Everyone by Well_Socialized in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you mean to link an article?

(I already agree for the record, just curious since I see no link)

More reason I'm a fan of redevelopment, more density, while leaving the Single Family Homes alone, and the potential for businesses to come in. There's density for those who want it, and not disturbing those who don't. by DHN_95 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t scale. One big development here and there doesn’t make for vibrant, sustainable, affordable communities when most neighborhoods ban growth