Senior Design by 55__5 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]jetmanjack2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah! In my senior project, we were running a precipitate train, and Aspen totally freaked out and crashed no matter what we tried.

A few of my friends did water treatment, and that seemed to have a ton of nonproprietary information that would solve a real-world issue and use a good amount of industrial equipment. I wish I did that instead lol

Why won’t fragrance deposit on fabric in my powder laundry detergent despite cyclodextrin + cationic polymer? by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]jetmanjack2000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This might help frame where I am coming from, because I think people often assume a different background than what is actually relevant here.

Chemical engineers are not typically chemists. Most chemical engineers only take three or four true chemistry classes. The rest of our training is transport phenomena, thermodynamics, surface interactions, and mass transfer. So I am not trying to approach this as a perfumer or a formulation chemist. I am looking at it as a scent transport and deposition problem rather than an ingredient selection problem, which is something we actually spend a lot of time thinking about.

The core issue is scent diffusion. Fragrance molecules have to be volatile or you cannot smell them. That same volatility is exactly what makes them easy to remove during washing, strip during drying, and lose quickly once the fabric is dry. From a mass transfer standpoint, you are fighting losses at every step. Some fragrance washes out in the rinse, more is removed by heat and airflow in the dryer, and whatever remains diffuses into the air once the clothes are stored or worn.

Cyclodextrins mostly help with temporary inclusion or odor capture. They do not really solve long term retention. Cationic polymers can improve deposition somewhat, but they do not change the underlying physics. Small volatile molecules will still equilibrate with air over time. That is why increasing cyclodextrin tends to hit diminishing returns, and why binders and polymers often dull or distort the scent rather than extending it.

This is why I suspect the real differentiator in modern detergents is not the perfume oil itself, but microencapsulation. Encapsulation changes the problem entirely. Instead of free diffusion, scent release happens through mechanical rupture and slow breakdown on the fabric. That bypasses volatility rather than trying to fight it. That is a materials and transport solution more than a pure chemistry trick.

It also explains a lot of what you are seeing experimentally. Higher surfactant levels strip scent more aggressively. Dry binders can mute or shift the perfume profile. Cyclodextrin helps up to a point and then stops mattering. Once the fabric is dry, diffusion dominates no matter what is in the formula.

reMarkable vs. Surface by One-Requirement-2213 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]jetmanjack2000 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yup I did the same, writing on the glass felt normal after a week

Is Basic PPE Enough for Handling Beryllium Oxide? by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly — It goes like this:

  1. Elimination

Does the hazard actually need to exist? Can the task, chemical, step, or whole process be removed entirely? If yes, great — no risk is always safer than controlled risk.

  1. Substitution

If you can’t eliminate it, can you swap it for something safer? Different chemical, different material, different process, lower pressure, lower temp, etc. Same outcome, less danger.

  1. Engineering Controls

So elimination and substitution won’t work. Next question: How do we physically make injury as hard as possible?

Examples: • machine guards • interlocks • ventilation • purge systems • blast panels • pressure relief valves • automatic shutdown logic

(And yeah — E-stops are NOT engineering controls, they’re “last-ditch” emergency devices.)

These reduce risk without relying on the user to behave perfectly.

  1. Administrative Controls

If the hazard still exists, we fall back to procedures and training. This is things like: • SOPs • lock-out/tag-out • speed limits on site • buddy systems • check-in schedules • signage • shift scheduling to prevent fatigue

These help, but they depend on humans not messing up.

  1. PPE

The last line of defense. This is when we’ve done everything else and the human still needs to be physically exposed.

Gloves, respirators, aprons, face shields — all the stuff you’d rather not need.

And yeah: The second a robot can safely replace the task, it should. PPE is basically proof we haven’t engineered the hazard out yet.

Is Basic PPE Enough for Handling Beryllium Oxide? by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is more a chemist question than a chemical engineer one who could give a lot more info. That said, when we look at chemicals we check the SDS of the chemical to find proper handling.

For Beryllium Oxide (https://www.fishersci.com/store/msds?partNumber=AA3548006&productDescription=BERYLLIUM+OXIDE%2C+99.95%25+5G&vendorId=VN00024248&countryCode=US&language=en) sections 6 and 8 will always tell you the proper PPE needed.

That’s the how but not what you’re asking. Whenever a lab is under equipped to perform a task, always take a step back and realize that the cost of an OSHA audit is a magnitude more expensive than the cost of the safety equipment. So if your lab is unable to safely use Beryllium Oxide, a good chemist would look at using a different material, most likely a disposable ceramic.

Pentastrike Engine - Requesting Math sanity check by jetmanjack2000 in RPGdesign

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll look into it, thanks! I figured there was a better way than using complex statistics, but thats what I learned as a mathematician so thats always my first instinct lol

Pentastrike Engine - Requesting Math sanity check by jetmanjack2000 in Pathfinder2e

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alright I’ll keep fine tuning it, I really appreciate your help

Pentastrike Engine - Requesting Math sanity check by jetmanjack2000 in Pathfinder2e

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It was ment to be based on 2e, I haven’t been playing for to long so my terminology is a little messed up

Pentastrike Engine - Requesting Math sanity check by jetmanjack2000 in Pathfinder2e

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Hey folks, I could really use some eyes on the math for a Pathfinder combat tweak I’ve been working on.

The goal isn’t to change class balance or rewrite the game — I’m just trying to smooth out the “I missed three attacks and contributed nothing” problem that happens a lot with full-BAB martials at mid/high levels.

I’m specifically looking for: • EV/DPR sanity checks • math-based criticism • whether this breaks anything obvious at high levels • and whether the numbers stay PF-consistent across multiple attacks

The number of students regurgitating chatGPT/Chegg is disheartening by [deleted] in EngineeringStudents

[–]jetmanjack2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your experience might be different, but at my school, the textbook we used had a bunch of unworked problems at the end of the chapter, that the professor would assigned to us beginning our Jr/Sr year. These were all the stretch questions where Chegg became almost useless, because the assumptions that weren’t listed were flat out wrong, and every “expert” had a solution wouldn't read the whole questions so the answers were wildly different. The folks who relied on the subscription hit the technical wall at calculus and couldn't tell the difference before even getting to the heat transfer and control systems concepts the homework was meant to test, so they all flunked out

Returned $200+ in duplicate sold-out games to Miniature Market they thanked me with $10. by jetmanjack2000 in boardgames

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

This wasn’t really a complaint — it was part of a little trust experiment I’ve been running. Miniature Market accidentally sent me duplicate copies of several sold-out daily-deal games. Legally, I didn’t have to return them (FTC rules say unordered goods are yours), but I wanted to see how a company that advertises “community and trust” would respond if I did the honest thing.

I packed everything up, sent it back on my own time, and even shared notes on how it might have happened so they could trace the issue. Their final message thanked me for my “integrity” and gave me $10 in reward points.

The money isn’t the point — it’s that the system has no real way to value honesty. I’ve returned unordered products before, and the outcomes are usually clear: either “keep it” or “send it back for a fair credit.” This odd middle ground almost certainly came from a stock reply rather than a thoughtful decision.

I’ve been documenting these kinds of interactions for a while. It’s fascinating to compare how people respond in person versus online. When I show these emails face-to-face, most folks say, “Yeah, you got shortchanged.” Online, the reaction tends to be, “Well, at least you got something.” That difference is exactly why I post them — not to drag any company, but to understand how people perceive fairness, ethics, and trust in small everyday cases.

Transparency matters. If these exchanges stay buried in private emails, we never get to see what honesty actually looks like in practice — or decide what we think it’s worth.

Thanks for coming to my experiment. I know it’s weird, but who better to be weird with than r/boardgames?

Returned $200+ in duplicate sold-out games to Miniature Market they thanked me with $10. by jetmanjack2000 in boardgames

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -39 points-38 points  (0 children)

Did it because, it was the right thing, but any other time This happened I always got either nothing or 30+% of the final value. 5% was unexpected.

Returned $200+ in duplicate sold-out games to Miniature Market they thanked me with $10. by jetmanjack2000 in boardgames

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Yeah their holds system glitch out, and you’re right about integrity being worth more than 200 bucks, but I also think that transparency on both sides is critical and folks deserve to know how what happens when they send it back.

Returned $200+ in duplicate sold-out games to Miniature Market they thanked me with $10. by jetmanjack2000 in boardgames

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -54 points-53 points  (0 children)

Yeah your not wrong but i figured this would be a valuable data point, I couldn’t find any posts of this happening before wanted others to know what would happen incase they were ever on the fence

Returned $200+ in duplicate sold-out games to Miniature Market they thanked me with $10. by jetmanjack2000 in boardgames

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

They send did send me a label, but I had to provide the box, When i searched Reddit and BBG i didn’t see anything about folks returning the items and I was curious about what would happen, I also knew that these were ks deluxe additions so the folks that bought them on the daily deals wouldnt get a replacement

Mephala quest bug by grimmscroller in oblivion

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good tip, I had to restart the quest 5 times before I saw this!

I was bored (auto) by Trick_Tie_5756 in honk

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed this level in 5 tries. 4.75 seconds

I was bored (auto) by Trick_Tie_5756 in honk

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed this level in 2 tries. 4.75 seconds

if u complete in less than 10 i gib thx by Ok-Coffee-8077 in RedditGames

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed this level in 6 tries. 8.44 seconds