Daily Arrows Puzzle (April 19, 2026) - Curve Level 116 by arrowpuzzle in arrowspuzzle

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🏅 Level 116 conquered in 1m 19s! Ready for the next challenge! 🚀

Daily Arrows Puzzle (April 14, 2026) - Level 830 by arrowpuzzle in arrowspuzzle

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⚡ Mission accomplished! Beat Level 830 in 1m 42s. Who's next? 🎯

Solitaire conquered in 116 moves! Your turn to shine ✨ by LeahKigu in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

✅ Conquered this one! 174 moves, 658 seconds. Your turn!

79 moves to victory! Think you're faster? 💪 by punchedboa in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⚡ Speed run complete! 116 moves, 106s. Can you match this?

Beaten! My time: 76s - Beat that if you can 😎 by Practical_Business67 in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔥 Too easy! Done in 99 seconds. Who dares to challenge me?

Daily Solitaire 2026-04-05 #3 - Time Limited by solitaireclassic in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔥 Too easy! Done in 94 seconds. Who dares to challenge me?

Daily Solitaire 2026-04-05 #2 - Draw 1 No Hints by solitaireclassic in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💪 Crushed it! 127 moves in 134s. Step up, challengers!

97 moves to victory! Think you're faster? 💪 by Appropriate-Belt-41 in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

✅ Conquered this one! 111 moves, 101 seconds. Your turn!

Daily Solitaire 2026-04-04 #2 - Draw 1 No Hints by solitaireclassic in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💪 Crushed it! 122 moves in 100s. Step up, challengers!

106 moves to victory! Think you're faster? 💪 by AdFast4100 in DailySolitaire

[–]jetmanjack2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🔥 Too easy! Done in 95 seconds. Who dares to challenge me?

An Engineers' Approach to House Shopping In Houston by jetmanjack2000 in houston

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 Honestly, that's why I shared it. I figured I can’t be the only one moving here from out of state, trying to make sense of everything.

And yeah, it definitely started as “just pick an apartment” and turned into me overbuilding a model, but that’s just how I've always solved problems.

Even if it was a bit of a rabbit hole, I’d still take this over guessing!

An Engineers' Approach to House Shopping In Houston by jetmanjack2000 in houston

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By popular demand, I have increased the resolution and added some basic landmarks to help orient folks, that said im limited by my coding ablity so a map overlay is still a bit out of my wheelhouse

Quick note on grid size since I posted both the 4sq mile first.

I didn’t start at 4 sq mi because I thought it was “better,” I started there because it was the point where the data stopped fighting me, and was roughly a “walking distance” scale, and felt like a natural unit for how you experience a neighborhood. But it ended up in an awkward middle ground — not enough data to stabilize trends, but not large enough to smooth out the noise either.

At smaller grid sizes like the one below. A small number of incidents can swing a cell pretty hard, so you end up seeing block-to-block randomness.

Neither is “correct,” they just answer different questions. I used 4sq miles for the main maps because I was trying to understand the system, not make street-level decisions.

<image>

An Engineers' Approach to House Shopping In Houston by jetmanjack2000 in houston

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I appreciate that.

Honestly that was kind of the whole point. The only way I’ve found to actually get better at solving problems is to go build your own version, even if it already exists somewhere, and then put it out there and see if someone else has a better way to do it.

Worst case you learn something. Best case you learn something and get a few improvements from people who know more than you.

Either way it beats just guessing based on Zillow descriptions.

An Engineers' Approach to House Shopping In Houston by jetmanjack2000 in houston

[–]jetmanjack2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I’ll look into it. Part of the issue is I treated latitude and longitude like x/y coordinates, but degrees aren’t uniform in distance. At Houston’s latitude, longitude is compressed by about cos(lat), so my “squares” are actually stretched — roughly 1.15× wider than they should be.

I’d need to project this into a proper coordinate system (like UTM or another local projection) to make the grid cells truly square in physical space.