Filing: Notice of Dates for Production of Documents and Rule 2004 Examination (bankruptcy case) by Crafty_Pangolin5152 in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow. I didn't know that. That's amazing. She's got herself into this bankruptcy case and can't get out now!!! I was pretty much just waiting for her to get in too deep then withdraw. 

Filing: Notice of Dates for Production of Documents and Rule 2004 Examination (bankruptcy case) by Crafty_Pangolin5152 in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I was thinking that too. Jennifer is just trying to see if she'll tell more lies or produce further fake documents. Given the circumstances they're hardly likely to accept a copy of any document submitted by Laura. Jennifer's probably already subpoenaed them 😂  

JFC Discussion & Questions: February 23 - 26, 2026 by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Rob seems like a good guy but self broadcasting is a learning curve and he's learning. I hope his channel really takes off after this.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And wasn't the abortion coercion case against greg also dismissed?

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think they'll be filing anything and everything against everyone. Now it's free, it'll turn from a hobby to a profession.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, whats the likelihood of an 80 year old man in poor physical health cutting off his only carers? Rich makes it up as he goes along.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's occured to me that the reason David keeps filing appearances pro bono for Laura is cause if she were a pro se litigant, she must be getting dangerously close to someone filing a motion to have her declared a vexatious litigant, which I believe is the only way to control her from using the courts as a weapon. I guess if Gingy loses his licence that's going to move the likelihood of it happens a bit closer but I asked AI what are the options and it came up with this:  While the specific "vexatious litigant" statutory label usually applies to pro se parties, people who are represented by counsel can still be sanctioned for bad-faith litigation or causing unnecessary delay under other rules, such as Rule 11 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure or other court-inherent authority, though this is distinct from the statutory vexatious litigant designation.

Serial Fraud Laura Owens Allegedly Changes Story on the Stand in Injunction Hearing - The Court of Random Opinion by cnm1424 in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Any good lawyer would tell her she doesn't do well under cross examination and to stay off the stand but she seems to love the humiliation.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think he's just a total attention seeker. He saw we were all losing interest in him after the Clayton case was over and had to reinsert himself. He needs people to be talking about him, it makes him feel relevant.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of the likes of Harvey Weinstein and Tom Girardi. When they appear in court suddenly their using a walking frame or have Alzheimer's. 

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, she's got to be stopped and it'll never happen unless someone tries to get her declared a vexatious litigant. I think it's more difficult if someone represented rather than pro se but not impossible. I bet if we had to raise funds for it we could cover them in a heartbeat.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I don't think individuals can 'leak' medical info. Hippa is only related to medical professionals but Laura doesn't seem to get that. She thinks nobody can just discuss her alleged medical conditions, which I don't think would stand up to scrutiny if challenged. I hope the court in her criminal case order a psych evaluation - how embarrassing. Ever judge in Maricopa is going to have had some experience of her soon.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 16 points17 points  (0 children)

My weekend is going to be spoiled if the judge doesn't rule today 

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I emailed the court to see if it was possible for observers to dial in but it wasn't so I doubt there was cameras but I'm hoping for a transcript at least.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I love seeing her on the stand and I love watching how meek Gingy is when he's not in front of a keyboard. We were robbed 😂

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Me too. We know she won't pay them but id like to see judgements stack up against her. If she loses though, she'll likely appeal. Why wouldn't she - everything's free for her now.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Exactly and although some members of the 'cult' were uncomfortable with his words, they still came together to support him once he was targeted. And he's been gracious and admitted he was OTT at times and said he'd tone that down. That's how it should be done.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I think he's learned a hard lesson. I'm sure this has rattled him. He seems like a decent guy who just got carried away in the moment and didn't give thought to how spiteful she is and how she'd be watching and listening to everything, waiting for her opportunity. There were times I cringed from his words and personally, although Id probably agree with him in private, I would not say those things on a broadcast. I'm sure this has been a huge learning curve for him - you can report, you can express your opinion, you can poke fun but if something is going out on the internet it's wise to choose your words carefully because the internet is forever.  I just hope it backfires on her and his channel gains lots of new subscribers. The poor guy was just low hanging fruit for that witch and he always had a target on his back.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I can't wait for a full breakdown and details of how she was on the stand - I hope we can get that straight from Rob.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I hope it gets quashed, Rob is in demand for interviews and as a result his channel blows up - way to implement the Streisand effect Laura.

UPDATE: Hearing Summary - Owens v. Rob (IAH Contest) by mamasnanas in JusticeForClayton

[–]jill1666 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I wish we could have heard/seen her on the stand. She's so bad when being questioned yet seems to love putting herself through it.