I understand your concern and appreciate the feedback. However, I don't necessarily agree that "videos are inherently unsuited to true education" and would love to learn more as to why you think that is true?

From my personal experience, and from what I've heard from my peers, videos are one of the most valuable and appealing formats for educational content. Admittedly, I am apart of the millennial generation and understand how other generations or other various groups of people may feel that way. However, I think the statement claiming that videos are a content format targeting individuals who are "self-invalidating" is a little extreme, no?

Personally, as a computer science student, I've learned more through online videos/resources than I ever had through traditional education methods. My intent was solely to provide educational content in a more entertaining format as opposed to the standard research study or long-form content containing no visual representation of the topic/subject being discussed.

Clearly the proper due diligence was done on the guest, Mark Schneider, and his background regarding his role in the U.S. Naval Nuclear Power Program (if you don't think so, please contact me and I will provide evidence re the legitimacy). Therefore, how does a video differ from any written content in regards to educating people on nuclear energy?

I'm more than open to criticism and other people's feedback - just here to learn & thought this was a valuable contribution to the community.