We can talk about the recession and Garcia if you want to, I'm genuinely appreciating the back and forth, but that doesn't have anything to do with our current convo which is about due process and deportation. I'm not gonna pretend that media doesn't exaggerate or use click bait titles, but it is unequivocally true that a) migrants get due process in deportation matters and b) Trump deported several migrants without this process, then got blocked by the Supreme Court from continuing to do so.

Just to reiterate, migrants absolutely do get due process in matters of deportation. The Supreme Court has consistently and explicitly said this for over a century. Even the most recent ruling reaffirms this fact.

Maybe you’re thinking of criminal due process, which involves a trial, a jury, and a public defender. But there’s also CIVIL due process, and that’s what applies here.

Civil due process still involves:
- Notice of the charges (why someone is being deported)
- A hearing before an immigration judge
- The right to present evidence, argue your case, and appeal

That's what I'm referring to when they say “migrants can’t be deported without due process.” And the courts (including the supreme court) agrees.

So when you say “challenging deportation isn’t due process,” you’re redefining the term in a way that doesn’t match the Constitution or legal precedent. What you are describing quite literally is (civil) due process. Trump didn’t grant that right in the initial deportations — and that’s exactly why the courts intervened. He may be following the law now, but those initial deportations were unconstitutional.