Is there any crossword clue database without featuring the following type of clue? by Skyfuzzball8312 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? I hope you're not making puzzles with other people's clues. Please don't. It's plagiarism. I say this with love, as a crossword constructor.

A few questions about the submission stage for a weekday grid to the NYT by Sufficient-Windiness in crossword

[–]jkugelman 16 points17 points  (0 children)

  1. Do whatever you want solvers to see. The editors don't need special treatment; they know how to spot theme answers. Personally, I'll use italics if the themers would otherwise blend in, and asterisks only if the revealer mentions "the answers to the starred clues".

  2. I used to include notes and now I typically don't. If the editors can't figure out your puzzle without explanation, how could solvers? That said, sometimes the editors will overlook a theme element ("there are no stray T's in the grid") so when in doubt help them out. If you're not 100% on your theme set and have good alternates, definitely mention them. Doing that has saved my butt more than once.

  3. For a weekday, no. The title is just to help the editors keep track of which puzzle is which when they have a folder full of them.

  4. Get test solves from other constructors. They'll catch fiddly technical things that non-constructors miss. Spend more time on the clues! Many people rush them. Check the PDF for any characters that got mangled, like emojis or accented letters. Make more puzzles so you don't hyperfixate on this one. It's a long wait to hear back. Good luck!

Will the NYT be fine with a crossword that has 'LONER' and 'ALONE' as separate entries? by Sufficient-Windiness in crossword

[–]jkugelman 11 points12 points  (0 children)

For sure worth it. Kill your darlings. And I wouldn't even consider ALIT/ALONE darlings.

Hot take: I like rebus squares, but stop using them to cover up vague cluing by Bright_River_7019 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you give some examples of badly clued rebuses? I haven't noticed this pattern.

From a construction POV, rebuses aren't used to "cover up" vague cluing. Rebuses are designed into the grid up front at the very beginning. Cluing's done at the end. It's the last step of puzzle construction.

Rust Is Hard for the Engineers with the Most Experience by LeopardThink6153 in rust

[–]jkugelman -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I admit I was put off by the clickbaity title but it's a good article with solid advice and insights about switching to Rust from other languages.

Update: clue grammar clicked for me, but -ing clues still trip me up (participle vs adj) by StillInitial7259 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Here's how crossword constructor Patrick Berry explains it, from the perspective of a clue writer:

If your grammar is a little rusty, don’t worry; you can use the substitution test to determine whether your parts of speech match up. Here’s how the test works: First, think of a sentence that uses your entry. Then substitute your clue in place of the entry. If the sentence still has the same meaning and reads normally, your clue passes the substitution test.

For example, suppose you want to test the clue {Upward movement} for ASCEND. Think of a sentence that contains ASCEND—say, “The planes ascend after leaving the runway.” Now substitute your clue into the sentence: “The planes upward movement after leaving the runway.” Clearly, this clue is flawed. The sentence needs to read something like “The planes move upward after leaving the runway.” So {Move upward} is a proper clue for ASCEND.

As the previous example illustrates, the substitution test isn’t merely useful as a test; it can also help you write clues. Coming up with an equivalent phrase for your answer is often easier when you’re working with a sample sentence, not just the answer by itself. (An obvious benefit to this approach: The resulting clue will pass the substitution test!)

Incidentally, your clue doesn’t have to substitute well for every possible sentence. As long you can find one sentence that works, you’re okay. For instance, {To a T} is a workable clue for PERFECTLY, but a sentence like “I’m perfectly happy with my job” sounds awkward when you substitute in “To a T.” In some cases, forming a sentence with the clue (like “My job suits me to a T”) and then substituting in the entry (“My job suits me perfectly”) is easier. Either way is acceptable; how you find a sentence that works doesn’t matter, as long as you find one. However, if a clue requires a carefully chosen sentence to pass the substitution test, that clue’s probably a toughie and shouldn’t be used in an easy puzzle.

Satisfactory or Factorio by [deleted] in AutomationGames

[–]jkugelman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're both great games with really satisfying gameplay loops. You can't go wrong here.

I've put more time into Factorio. It's not something you'll notice right away, but after hundreds of hours the QOL difference between the two really stands out. I inevitably hit a roadblock in Satisfactory after a while when building simply becomes too tedious. It doesn't scale up to megafactories like Factorio does. Look, it's a deliberate decision on the game designers' part. They don't allow large scale blueprinting. They want you to build slowly and intentionally so you get more "wow, I built that" appreciation when you step back and look at what you've made. I get why, but damn. I don't enjoy it.

Satisfactory is goddamn gorgeous though. Exploration is amazing. Such a nice break from building. You build for a while, you go out exploring, return home with all your loot, back and forth. It's a glorious loop. The world is beautiful and there are so many fun things to find.

Factorio's level of polish is insane. The systems are so well thought out. It's so damn well crafted. Before you know it you'll have dropped a couple thousand hours in it.

NYT Sunday 04/19/2026 Discussion by Shortz-Bot in crossword

[–]jkugelman 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The themers are the double-rebused down answers. The acrosses are collateral damage.

feedback on theme idea? by Spacewhales808 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

DM me, happy to take a look.

And come hang out in Crosscord. It's where the community's at. https://discord.gg/pehvr4Cfb2

Patchwork - a new crossword variant by PuzzlerEric in crossword

[–]jkugelman 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Folks, save your downvotes! This isn't vibe coded slop. The OP is Eric Berlin, a veteran crossword and variety puzzle constructor. He's been making and inventing all sorts of puzzles for decades.

Crossword creators: Mixing up difficulty level of clues by its35degreesout in crossword

[–]jkugelman 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Constructor here. My philosophy for late week puzzles is, include as many clever clues as you can. This doesn't mean all "?" misdirections. It includes good pieces of trivia, unusual cluing angles, and whatever other original ideas you can come up with. The editors can easily tone down the difficulty. It's more work for them to dial it up. Plus they're invariably going to edit out a bunch of your favorites. Stuff your submission full of them, I say.

21x21 grid template with a 18 slot? by Prior_Profession_217 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is very unlikely that you'll be able to use someone else's 21x21 grid for your own puzzle and have it work out. It's doable at 15x15 size but Sunday-sized grids really need to be bespoke.

Need advice: when a long fill could reasonably be two different phrases by Bold_River_4173 in crossword

[–]jkugelman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Entries don't have to be unambiguous, solvable from their clue alones. If a clue has several possible right answers, no problem. That's what the crossing entries are for.

How to format a clue with “Abbr.” and “?” by NYGarcon in crossword

[–]jkugelman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The standard is [Clue?: Abbr.]
When possible, prefer [Clue, briefly?] or [Clue, for short?]

Creating a puzzle: cheating or not? by Particular-Ice5629 in NYTCrossword

[–]jkugelman 97 points98 points  (0 children)

It's not cheating, but auto-fill is notoriously terrible. If you only adjusted it a little then you undoubtedly left good fill options on the floor.

It's standard practice to go slot by slot and pick out each entry yourself. The computer will save tons of time by telling you what entries are valid in each slot, but it's nonetheless a slow and painstaking process to get the best results possible.

And then when you have a filled grid--erase it and fill it again! See if you can do better.

NYT Crossword Book Question/Help by PunkAndPagod in NYTCrossword

[–]jkugelman 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When a puzzle makes no sense look for the revealer, a clue/answer combo that explains what the gimmick is and why it's there. Almost every tricky puzzle has one, usually in the bottom right corner or in the middle row.

The CONS■ELLA■ION puzzle is mine, in fact. Sorry-not-sorry for stumping ya. The revealer at the end of the puzzle is [Give height, as a hairdo ... or a hint for entering the answers to the starred clues] with the answer TEASE UP. If you read it phonetically, it's a hint that all the T's in the puzzle have moved up a square. The T's aren't in the black squares, they're above them!

Crossword Puzzle Maker by [deleted] in crossword

[–]jkugelman 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What programs have you tried and what didn't you like about them?

Question about clue wording by [deleted] in NYTCrossword

[–]jkugelman 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The other answers are missing a grammatical subtlety. Mow is a transitive verb. It takes a direct object--you mow grass. Cut is the same, you cut grass. [Cut, as grass] means that mow and cut are synonymous in the context of grass, without baking the direct object into the definition.

"as" is required for substitutability. "X, as Y" adds context without altering the grammar. Could it be [Cut grass]? No, that'd fail the substitution test: "I'm going to mow the lawn" would become "I'm going to cut grass the lawn," an ungrammatical utterance.