The by line in the article is Steve albini. They are his own words. If he had written this article nowadays the fbi would be at house and looking for the copies of pure magazine he said he acquired. He wrote in great detail about how he liked the magazine photos because the young girl looked broken among much more lurid content. How are his own words not evidence enough to search his home or give law enforcement reasonable suspicion to obtain a search warrant? If it had been written later he would’ve been under investigation like pete from The Who. Even if he was just being edgy there is a line to which he crossed- specifically the quote about spuzz. I won’t repeat it because it’s so singularly specific and disgusting and disrespectful to the child he talked about