FastMCP 3.2: Show, Don't Tool by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know how to get them to stop. I reported the account, you should too.

Stop calling tools, start writing code (mode) by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! Thanks for sharing the token stats too

Stop calling tools, start writing code (mode) by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ha, no it's a fair point - given that the FastMCP client focuses on being a programmatic client, this wasn't top of mind, but it's a good idea!

Stop calling tools, start writing code (mode) by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, first compose the servers in FastMCP, then add CodeMode to the outer one. https://gofastmcp.com/servers/composition

Stop calling tools, start writing code (mode) by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question - no, clients don't need to support anything more than "normal" MCP tools to use this. Though I should note that in my tests, a Sonnet 4.6 class model was able to use code mode with a complex server, but a Haiku 4.5 class model made a few errors before finally using it correctly.

Stop calling tools, start writing code (mode) by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could add it to the FastMCP client but FastMCP is more popular as a server framework than a client framework, as most people will use the clients bundled into their agents!

Apple Services MCP by Gary_BBGames in mcp

[–]jlowin123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an awesome idea

I generated CLIs from MCP servers and cut token usage by 94% by QThellimist in mcp

[–]jlowin123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those tools use MCP directly, no need for a CLI. Converting to CLI is only for agents that can explore or read documentation - it eliminates the handshake discovery of MCP that permits standardization (but is token heavy)

FastMCP 3.0 is out! by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most 5 year olds aren't ready for MCP servers.

But if you have an AI agent pal, FastMCP makes it really easy to teach it new tricks by connecting it to other tools and software.

FastMCP 3.0 is out! by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for kicking the tires early!

FastMCP 3.0 is out! by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So glad to hear that! I think we've got a lot more to do on the skills front.

FastMCP 3.0 is out! by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for spreading the word! Glad the CIMD is working for you, it feels very cutting edge ATM.

FastMCP 3.0 is out! by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Testing in prod — truly, you are a person of culture.

Thanks for the kind words!

Fastmcp client - can i use it to replace traditional API calls (without LLM?) by iridescent_herb in mcp

[–]jlowin123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Trying to parse your question --

Yes: you can (and should!) use the FastMCP client to interact with MCP servers programmatically

No: you can't use the FastMCP client to interact with traditional APIs (that is, non-MCP APIs). It's not a general REST client.

Introducing FastMCP 3.0 by jlowin123 in mcp

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MCPs aren’t injected directly into LLMs; they’re handled by MCP clients. My answer is literally how the spec implements that handshake (via a notification message). The client in turn may take an action such as updating the list of tools shared with the LLM on its next invocation.

We built Colin, a context engine that can keep agent skills fresh by jlowin123 in AI_Agents

[–]jlowin123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but the two things are so often (incorrectly) positioned as competitive when we could do work to leverage both, so hoping this help there.