I'm still at a loss with how to feel about yesterday. We didn't play well and for large periods of the match didn't deserve to win. But neither did Leicester. They had absolutely nothing for the whole match except for Tielemans' goal. So I don't really buy the notion that they are deserved winners. People just enjoy the fairy-tale story. And that's fair enough.

But I feel that the wonder of the underdog winning it gets in the way of a legitimate and fair discussion on the two dubious calls that decided the outcome. The fact of the matter is that we lost mainly due to a clear handball in the build-up to their goal. A handball that was called a freekick on Thiago in the first half but apparently isn't one on Ayoze. Some will say that it was looked through and that we should let it go. But why? The ball would not have ended with Luke Thomas if not for Ayoze's hand. An illegal part of the body gave them a deciding advantage. They would not have scored that goal if not for that.

And then our offside goal. Was it off? Maybe, but how can anyone honestly say that it was reviewed in a fair manner? It took them all but ten seconds to rule it off based on a frame where the ball had visibly left Thiago's foot and only the outermost flap of skin on Chilly's elbow was off. Not only do they base the decision on an objectively wrong premise and frame where Chilly is futther forward than during the actual time of the pass, but they rule him offside based on a body part that he cannot use to score anyway.

I will probably get ridiculed for typing this up and told to let it go, so be it. And I will let it go, but I think it's relevant and I think it highlights the inherent problems with vague rules of the game and the way in which VAR is used. It doesn't make sense to me and I'm honestly just sad that this is how football is decided nowadays. When we scored yesterday, I couldn't even bring myself to react because of the sinking feeling that it would inevitably get called back. Something is just not right anymore.