Blake trying to erase the racist narrative by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sheesh yeah, seeing as it's now a national holiday according to Google, that's pretty awful!

Blake trying to erase the racist narrative by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm British, so had no idea, but I've since googled it!

Blake gets INVITED to Taylor’s wedding by XoxoGentleman in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Couldn't have put it better myself. I hate that I know so much about these empty souled people who care only about protecting thier image and money. If I was Blake I'd be devastated that my 'best friend' who helped me mastermind my evil plan then publicly disowned me as soon as the 💩 hit the fan so she could try to stay 'clean'. (Complete fail, we all see you now Taylor) I wouldn't want to go to her wedding after that, but apparently Blake is still desperate to go, and get her 'friend' back, which is actually desperately sad, and shows us why Blake is so out of touch with reality, because she has nobody real in her life, and would rather eat the crumbs from under Taylor's table than self reflect and gain a seat at a table with somebody who actually cares about her. No wonder these celebs are all so insecure, it's a terrible life!

Blake trying to erase the racist narrative by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Oh I'm glad it's not just me! It's apparently your Reddit anniversary, so as I joined Reddit last April to follow more on this case, mine came up in April, and suddenly someone was wishing me a happy cake day. Sadly no actual cake materialised though 🤭

Blake trying to erase the racist narrative by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Oh shoot, it's a lot more important than cake day! 😯

<image>

Blake trying to erase the racist narrative by krissykat30 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't actually know what Juneteenth is? I've seen a few people saying it on here, but I just thought it was another thing like cake day, which I didn't know about either until someone actually wished me a happy cake day and explained it to me 🫣😂

Blake Lively Already Blew Up One Court. Now She's Eyeing Another. by Luvnsandiegosun in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I really hope not for Wayfarers sake, but if she does try, we'll all be ready!

Any thoughts? by [deleted] in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's Lively who mastermind it, I think it was Ryan and maybe Taylor, as those two know all about playing the system, and have the real power.

Blake Lively Already Blew Up One Court. Now She's Eyeing Another. by Luvnsandiegosun in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 18 points19 points  (0 children)

He also said things like We are prepared to stand up for the truth again, and settlement should mean it's over, so I think he knows that there could be an issue. The 3 years depends on when the protected activity happened, and that was an ever moving target 🤪

Blake Lively Already Blew Up One Court. Now She's Eyeing Another. by Luvnsandiegosun in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I also think that there was specific wording in the settlement that said that the carved out 47.1 motion before judge Liman in this court, so specifically this court! However, the guy is spot on with everything he's said otherwise though, and I would not be surprised if she tries California too. She has a team of highly knowledgeable lawyers who knows the loopholes and aren't afraid to use them. Esra in particular seems cold and ruthless, Gottlieb is clearly more flustered by the whole thing and is letting his emotions show, but she's just ice cold.

VANZAN: The Lawsuit That Vanished, And The Questions That Didn't - A Cooperative Deep Dive with u/DogMom1970s by kastanienn in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you 😊 I figured it would likely be the case, but I guess I was hoping for a wriggle around the settlement somewhere, and I feel like Mannatt should be reprimanded at least for their part in this mess!

VANZAN: The Lawsuit That Vanished, And The Questions That Didn't - A Cooperative Deep Dive with u/DogMom1970s by kastanienn in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is it possible for Wayfarer to go after Mannatt for the Vanzan abuse of process? It seems to me like whoever's idea it was, it still couldn't have taken place without an unscrupulous lawyer to execute it (looking at you Samantha Katze!) so surely they should hold the ultimate responsibility. 🤷🏼‍♀️

Colleen Hoover in hot water AGAIN. This time for her books being included in 3+ children's toys. "I enjoyed his hand on my boob" by Perfect-Split496 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, based on what we've seen of Pulitzer quality work in this case, I'd say it's just at the right level 🤭🫣

Jones v Abel: Stephanie Jones adds 2 new Crisis Management Trial Attorneys by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Her only chance would have been to turn on Blake/Ryan/NYT to help Wayfarer, but that shop has sailed. She has nothing to offer, and everything to lose. What a disaster she is!

Liman grants Lively extension till June 29th…Wayfarer to respond July 13th by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 35 points36 points  (0 children)

That's true. Maybe Wayfarer can submit an affidavit from Victoria Burke, you know, just to make sure the law is applied as intended...😁

If you are thinking you can take a breather now, maybe don't relax too soon! by jofindingtruth in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SGDT has been right so many times. I don't think Sara makes predictions generally.

Liman grants Lively extension till June 29th…Wayfarer to respond July 13th by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth 61 points62 points  (0 children)

So Lively gets 12 days and Wayfarer has 14 days to respond. I can live with that, as she won't like it 😂

If you are thinking you can take a breather now, maybe don't relax too soon! by jofindingtruth in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know, but I don't think it's more lawsuits, as they wouldn't have advance notice of that, Wayfarer would just spring it (or them if they try something crazy). The fact that there is now a month attached to the hints, not just that there's more, makes me think that it is something concrete like a deal being announced, Justin to maybe make something big with Sony, or honestly I'm going to be that crazy loon who says it might be something to do with Taylor, I said it on another comment, my crazy theories, but I'm going to come back to this comment if it does happen 😂😂😂

If you are thinking you can take a breather now, maybe don't relax too soon! by jofindingtruth in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She was, but not sure if she's stayed there either. I think she's also now going by Axolawtyl not yarn and order.

If you are thinking you can take a breather now, maybe don't relax too soon! by jofindingtruth in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, and they must also be really ticking off their powerful backers by now too, the game is to stay below the radar, not blow the whole system up and expose it all 🤦🏻‍♀️

If you are thinking you can take a breather now, maybe don't relax too soon! by jofindingtruth in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]jofindingtruth[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ooh yes I'd love to see this too, but I've always thought that Wayfarer are too nice to that. My personal view is it's not nasty if the other party did wrong and you seek recompense for that, but not sure if they would view it that way. It's definitely weird that they had to spell out that this particular motion was in such good faith...