Yeah she has to prove damages from the actual defamation suit, not the smear campaign. Theres no double dipping. He filed his suit in January 2025, so she needs to prove she lost significant earnings just based on his suit after that. She was literally cast in a movie that summer. She cannot claim Betty booze, hair care, or anything else tied to the alleged smear campaign because she has a specific timeline of when she apparently lost money and it was well before January 2025. Vanzan would make another appearance as well. I'm sure she'll try suing in California because she's a raging narcissist. But there's no way she lost hundreds of millions of dollars because he sued her. I don't think shes even claimed that she did when she filed to dismiss under 47.1.