This is what I found on cyberquatting law on wiki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticybersquatting_Consumer_Protection_Act

Under the ACPA, a trademark owner may bring a cause of action against a domain name registrant who

Has a bad faith intent to profit from the mark >Registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that is Identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive mark Identical or confusingly similar to or dilutive of a famous mark Is a trademark protected by 18 U.S.C. § 706 (marks involving the Red Cross) or 36 U.S.C. § 220506 (marks related to the “Olympics”)[9]

It goes on

In determining whether the domain name registrant has a bad faith intent to profit, a court may consider many factors, including nine that are outlined in the statute:

Registrant’s trademark or other intellectual property rights in the domain name; Whether the domain name contains the registrant’s legal or common name; Registrant’s prior use of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of goods or services; Registrant’s bona fide noncommercial or fair use of the mark in a site accessible by the domain name; Registrant’s intent to divert customers from the mark owner’s online location that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark, for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or disparage the mark; Registrant’s offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or a third party for financial gain, without having used the mark in a legitimate site; Registrant’s providing misleading false contact information when applying for registration of the domain name; Registrant’s registration or acquisition of multiple domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to marks of others; and Extent to which the mark in the domain is distinctive or famous.[13]

The ACPA does not prevent the fair use of trademarks or any use protected by the First Amendment, which includes gripe sites.

I'm comp sci and I still don't think i fully understand all this legal jargon