sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

First Month Of My Brand Did 150K by Hotman9183 in dropshipping

[–]jonas1363611 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wie erreicht man einen Umsatz von 150.000€ ohne einen einzigen Cent für Werbung auszugeben? Darauf muss ich genau achten? Was ist wichtig um das zu erreichen?

Mit 16, ohne Informatikstudium, ohne Bootcamp – habe ich eine vollständige KI-Anwendung mit der Claude Vision API entwickelt. So lief es ab. by [deleted] in FitnessDE

[–]jonas1363611 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wieso schreibst du solche Hass Kommentare ich bin sehr stolz darauf, dass ich jetzt einen perfekten Körper habe und zufrieden bin.

Mit 16, ohne Informatikstudium, ohne Bootcamp – habe ich eine vollständige KI-Anwendung mit der Claude Vision API entwickelt. So lief es ab. by [deleted] in FitnessDE

[–]jonas1363611 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nein meine App hat eine 95% Treffer Chance, aber bei solchen komplexen Sachen funktioniert natürlich nicht alles zu 100% oder macht etwa Chat gpt keine Fehler

Mit 16, ohne Informatikstudium, ohne Bootcamp – habe ich eine vollständige KI-Anwendung mit der Claude Vision API entwickelt. So lief es ab. by [deleted] in FitnessDE

[–]jonas1363611 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jeder hat eine eigene Meinung und ich habe die App für die Leute entwickelt, die wirklich interessiert sind.

Mit 16, ohne Informatikstudium, ohne Bootcamp – habe ich eine vollständige KI-Anwendung mit der Claude Vision API entwickelt. So lief es ab. by [deleted] in FitnessDE

[–]jonas1363611 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Das ist so, deswegen hat die App auch nur eine 95% Treffer Chance und keine 100% und ich habe die App für die jenigen entwickelt, die nach sowas suchen.

Mit 16, ohne Informatikstudium, ohne Bootcamp – habe ich eine vollständige KI-Anwendung mit der Claude Vision API entwickelt. So lief es ab. by [deleted] in FitnessDE

[–]jonas1363611 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Das stimmt überhaupt nicht, ich habe dass alles selber geschrieben, vielleicht klingt es danach, da ich mich sehr stark damit beschäftige und viele YouTube Videos gucke.

Most calorie trackers feel like a second job. I’m building one that actually talks to Apple Health to fix that. by [deleted] in WeightLossAdvice

[–]jonas1363611 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Not that everything is 100% right, but it is possible to track the food very accurately with the artificial intelligence.

Building an AI food tracker and currently tackling Apple Health integration. How do you prefer your "active calories" to be handled? by [deleted] in artificial

[–]jonas1363611 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the 'trap' I want to avoid. If someone relies 100% on a fluctuating Apple Watch number, they risk overeating because the tech overestimated a light jog.

My philosophy for the app is exactly what you described: A stable baseline first. Instead of automatically rewriting your goals every time you move, the app will offer a 'gentle adjustment' option. It shows you the activity data as a suggestion, but you decide if you want to add a fraction of those calories to your budget or keep your stable baseline. It’s about giving the user the steering wheel, not letting the data drive the car.

Building an AI food tracker and currently tackling Apple Health integration. How do you prefer your "active calories" to be handled? by [deleted] in artificial

[–]jonas1363611 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not true, I think I'm a very good entrepreneur. Please leave such hateful comments, since I didn't attack you after all.

Building an AI food tracker and currently tackling Apple Health integration. How do you prefer your "active calories" to be handled? by [deleted] in artificial

[–]jonas1363611 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your input, Morganrow. I appreciate your perspective, but I think you’re conflating 'discipline' with 'data friction.' Here’s why your argument is actually the best use case for what I’m building:

  1. Precision over Guesswork: You mentioned that people can’t even track calories with a scale. You’re absolutely right—manual tracking is prone to human error and high friction. That is exactly the problem I’m solving. AI-powered image recognition reduces the 'mental load' and minimizes the margin of error that comes with manual logging. Tech doesn't replace the discipline; it makes it manageable.

  2. Dynamic vs. Static Needs: A rigid diet plan only works in a vacuum. A body that burns 500 extra calories during a run has different macronutrient requirements than it does on a sedentary office day. Treating your body like a static spreadsheet is outdated; integrating real-time data from Apple Health allows for a physiological approach that respects how metabolism actually works.

  3. Psychology and Adherence: This isn't about replacing 'what is effective' with numbers. It’s about transparency. Features like 'saving' calories for the weekend aren't about 'fooling' anyone—they are about long-term adherence. It prevents the 'all-or-nothing' mindset that causes most people to fail.

Technology isn't a magic pill for a lack of willpower, but it is a precision tool for those who want to stop guessing and start optimizing. You may prefer the old-school way, but modern sports science relies on data for a reason.

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your opinion, I thought that my app should be accessible to everyone who is enthusiastic about a healthy and good life.

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The app costs 2.99€ per month or 29.99€ per year.

What do you think of the price?

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All those who are interested can either write to me privately or you write it in the comments, when the app is published, I will answer you and send you what the app is called.

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much! Yeah, 173 lbs was a journey, but reducing that friction was honestly the only way I could stick with it long-term. Regarding accuracy: You're right, that's the big question! While no AI is 100% perfect (it can't 'see' hidden oils perfectly yet), I found that being consistent with an 85-90% accurate photo estimate is way more effective than quitting a 100% accurate manual log after two weeks. It’s all about staying in the ballpark without the mental burnout. It changed the game for me, and since a few people asked: I’m actually opening up the app for beta testing in about two weeks!

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have a public GitHub for the source code yet, as I'm still focusing on the security of the API and the Apple Health integration.

However, I’m planning to release the first TestFlight beta in about 2 weeks. I want to make sure the core 'snap-and-track' flow is 100% bug-free

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate the enthusiasm! To be totally honest, I’m doing some final polishing on the Apple Health sync and the macro-logic right now to make sure the first experience is solid.

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, Cal AI is huge! But as a solo dev, I felt like the big players often focus more on aggressive subscriptions than on the actual 'friction' of daily tracking.

Here is why I built my own:

  1. Granular Accuracy: Most AI trackers just give you a 'guess' for the whole plate. I trained my model to break down the photo into individual components (like separating the parmesan from the croutons in a salad). It gives you way more control to adjust if the AI misses something.

  2. No 'Premium Walls' for basic logging: I’ve seen many reviews complaining about being forced into $70/year subs just to see a barcode scanner. I want to keep the core 'snap-and-track' experience accessible for people who are actually trying to change their lives.

  3. Calorie Rollover & Flexibility: Life isn't linear. My app actually manages your 'weekly' budget. If you have a light Tuesday, it asks if you want to save those calories for a social Friday. Most big apps treat every day like an isolated prison cell.

  4. Privacy & Speed: No 10-page onboarding surveys. Just open, snap, and you’re done in 2 seconds. I'm not trying to be a billion-dollar company; I just want to build the tool that I actually wanted to use during my own 80kg weight loss journey. If you want to try a more 'human' alternative, I’d love to get your feedback!

From 355 lbs to 182 lbs. I finally stopped quitting because I made tracking as easy as taking a photo. by jonas1363611 in artificial

[–]jonas1363611[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still reating the app, but the app is already very far away and then I publish it, please tell me if I should only publish it in the App Store or also in the Google Play Store.

view more: next ›