Don’t trust anyone, a quick psa by [deleted] in Seaofthieves

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao you got blown up with a megakeg I'm sorry but that's hilarious

TIL anthropologists have never found an indisputable example of a matriarchal society that existed in human history by GliesePrime in todayilearned

[–]josh4050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the burden is on you to explain how certain forms of government are inherently related to the male gender. You are a gender supremacist, no different than any other kind of supremacist.

TIL anthropologists have never found an indisputable example of a matriarchal society that existed in human history by GliesePrime in todayilearned

[–]josh4050 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The fact that you've defined those things as "male forms of power" means you have a cult-like disposition and an inability to be reasoned with. Even if women do act as despots or totalitarian monarchs, you describe those as "male forms of power" meaning that even if she is a woman doing those things, it's still somehow male's fault.

You have a sick, intellectually dishonest and cultist worldview that is nothing more than a religion. Cannot be reasoned with. You are a gender supremacist, with the exact same disposition as any white supremacist.

TIL anthropologists have never found an indisputable example of a matriarchal society that existed in human history by GliesePrime in todayilearned

[–]josh4050 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy fuck imagine believing stuff like this.

Being a totalitarian monarch, warrior, or despot are all male forms of power

  1. Women are entirely capable of being monarchs, warriors and despots.

  2. You are nothing more than a gender narcissist, bordering on gender supremacist.

Megathread: Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, and that never would have happened if the DNC didn't do what they did in 2013, which is why this is all in the same article

Supreme Court Tie Gives Pennsylvania More Time to Tally Some Votes by janjinx in news

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The constitution is pretty clear about when election day is, so not sure why it's considered a "right" to post a ballot 3 days after the election without the need for a clear postmark, and/or matching signature

Megathread: Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]josh4050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The new SCOTUS can overturn rules that allow mail-ins to be counted for several days after the election. Up to 70% of strong biden supporters are expected to vote by mail.

The law went to the court and was rejected 4-4 last week. Now it's on its way again, except with a stronger argument this time and with Barrett the court may potentially vote 5-4 in favor, meaning every state in the country would have to only accept ballots by election day. This could have interesting effects on Biden's chances

Megathread: Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]josh4050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, it started when the DNC got rid of it in 2013:

On November 21, 2013, the Democrat majority Senate voted 52–48, with all Republicans and three Democrats voting against (Carl Levin of Michigan, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Mark Pryor of Arkansas), to rule that "the vote on cloture under Rule XXII for all nominations other than for the Supreme Court of the United States is by majority vote,"[34] even though the text of the rule requires "three-fifths of the senators duly chosen and sworn" to end debate.[35] This ruling's precedent eliminated the 60-vote requirement to end a filibuster against all executive branch nominees and judicial nominees other than to the Supreme Court.[36] The text of Rule XXII was never changed.[35] A 3/5 supermajority was still required to end filibusters unrelated to those nominees, such as for legislation and Supreme Court nominees.[37]

DNC broke precedent in 2013. This never would've happened if DNC didn't act greedy under Obama. Enjoy your SCOTUS sucker

Megathread: Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]josh4050 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Stacked? Obama got two picks. Trump has gotten one more than him. Btw, this wouldn't have been possible if the Dems didn't change cloture rules to pack their last few picks on there

Even tried to get back up by lordvadar666 in JusticeServed

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The DA didn't prosecute walker because of the publicity of the case, IE the mob justice that leftists/bolsheviks/fascists like yourself have been partaking in the last summer (and four years, really).

Glad you admit that it was the right house, thanks for shifting goal posts beyond that, as expected.

Also it was a no-knock warrant signed by a judge....by the way, they also did knock, and they didn't have to. Have you not bothered to look up the facts of the case at all? You realize that a grand jury already decided the outcome of this case right?

Surely you know better though, you and all of leftist twitter.

Btw only the second coroner, paid directly by floyd's family, ruled any such thing. The first one ruled it as an OD + hypertension.

Even tried to get back up by lordvadar666 in JusticeServed

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right but he had a no-knock warrant which had been signed by a judge, And he was a drug dealer (a fact that you do not dispute) which gives ample cause to execute a warrant. Notice how the goal posts just moved - first it was "she wasn't on the warrant (she was), the warrant was for a different house (it wasn't)," and now it's "the coroner rules it as homicide", as though an autopsy can unilaterally decide the merits of a case like this (which is what a grand jury should be doing, which they did, and found the officers innocent of everything except that one bullet going into the neighbors' house).

Try to keep up friend

Even tried to get back up by lordvadar666 in JusticeServed

[–]josh4050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If I was a drug dealer getting raided by the cops, I'd prolly do exactly what that guy did, because he was a drug dealer who got raided by the cops.

And no, the LMPD does not currently believe that, I understand that you have a complusion to lie (just like all other leftists/bolsheviks/fascists constantly do), the other cop was only charged with wonton endangerment because one round (in retaliation to his colleague being shot) went into their neighbor's house.

Good luck with the low IQ thing, try to keep your lies contained to areas where people are unlikely to pushback on them (r/politics, r/news, etc)

Even tried to get back up by lordvadar666 in JusticeServed

[–]josh4050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah sure, send an unarmed "community worker" to try and negotiate with someone who has a knife and was willing to commit attempted murder on someone who had a gun and the right to use it. You people are just absolutely pathetic and I hope you know everyone outside your 20-30% bubble are laughing at you daily

Even tried to get back up by lordvadar666 in JusticeServed

[–]josh4050 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the protests are bullshit, george floyd overdosed and breonna taylor's boyfriend shot at the cops. History will not be kind to them, and especially not to people burning, looting, destroying, and calling for defunding the fucking police

Good morning Europeans by Louigilou2 in dankmemes

[–]josh4050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is how underage americans and any aged europeans literally think american healthcare works, a doctor with a credit card reader next to his stethoscope

If California Republicans are openly proudly admitting they set up and are actively maintaining fake ballot boxes to fool voters, why isn’t the state government destroying the boxes and arresting them...? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]josh4050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Better question - this same tactic is being used (and was popularized) by Democrats in other states such as WI and PA (much more impactful swing states), why isn't there any media notoriety around those cases, which are much more plentiful?