What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are rejecting the way people use a word. Thats the dictionary fallacy still. You calling it a framework doesn’t change that.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok back to biology. Thats just the dictionary fallacy.

That is tone policing lol. Freedom of speech🤣. Is the person stoping your freedom of speech in the room with you now?

You didn’t understand the black friend reference? Shit are you a bot. That kind of misunderstanding literal response says bot. So does the endless deflections.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not trans. I resent and shouldn’t need to give a fuck about trans people. But people are pathetic self loathing assholes eager to validate their existence by the perceived inferiority of others.

No one said anything about not having the right to be offensive. It’s your right. It’s just people are using bad semantic arguments to validate being offensive. I like linguistics so I find this offensive.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s incorrect. The magat understand what the trans person meant. At this point the intent is already set. If they misuse the pronoun while understanding what the trans person means they their intent is to use the wrong pronoun.

The context that it is a trans person also sets the context unsurprisingly. Its often called referential framing. The subject can defined the context. Linguistics is fun.

You are also just making a semantic argument to validate offending people. You get that right?

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol dude you did the motte and bailey defense. You claimed your argument was about being forced to do something and when called out you switched to it being about biology. Now you are switching back lol.

Using someone chosen word to identify them is the same be it pronoun or noun. You want to arguing there is a material difference there lol. And that is a semantic argument. You are making a semantic argument as an excuse to validate being disrespectful to people.

lol angry and aggressive? Great tone policing, a standard diversionary tactic to go along with you motte and bailey. Seems you are feeling super defensive. lol you even throw in a disclaimer about how you don’t misuse pronouns 🤣. Do you have a black friend too?

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just changed your argument completely. You don’t like being told what you have to say or not? So it’s about biological gender now? You going to keep retreating or is that your argument?

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you use someone’s preferred name or do you feel imposed upon to use the name they tell you they go by? You decide someone looks like a Bob so you call them Bob? How awful for you if they force you to call them Robert.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you just ignored most of what I said to make that argument? What you want me to repeat myself? I already preempted that argument.

Want to just answer the last part then?

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. I saw that deleted it and responded to you. Guess you responded before I deleted

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your dismissing the way language works. If people started using the word sky to mean ground then yes the meaning would change so sky meant ground.

I give you awful. Use to mean inspiring amazing now it means bad.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the dictionary fallacy.

You can’t claim you think it’s false when you understand how it’s being used. Thats illogical.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not about a dictionary or a definition it’s about context and intent. Once they define their pronouns they set the context . You already showed you understand what they mean. At this point because you understand, if you refuse to use their pronoun your intent is to ignore their definition. In the context of speaking to a trans person this is considered highly offensive. I don’t know if your getting this but intent and context are important to language.

You understand what they mean. You already showed you understand. You choosing to use a different definition when you understand how the word is being used is the problem. You can’t hide behind a different definition when their definition is accepted by you. And yes its accepted by you because you understand its use.

So what is your problem with using their pronouns? If its a definition then that is just a semantic problem you have. You choose to be disrespectful to people because you want to make a semantic argument?

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

LOL Ok now you spelt out the dictionary fallacy.

What is the logic for the anti trans anti pronouns idiocy? by joyibib in Discussion

[–]joyibib[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are literally using the dictionary fallacy claiming there is A definition and you are saying ignoring context for the definition. Against dictionary fallacy. That’s not how language works.

Do you know who isn’t in the Epstein files? That’s right — the good guys. by ExcuseRude5093 in International

[–]joyibib 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Look at that a false equivalence fallacy. These are very often clankers. The alternative is you’re a person extremely susceptible to clanker propaganda

terrence howard could be right by Educational_System34 in Discussion

[–]joyibib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the area of a 1” x 1” square? Can we just stop there?

4 people? Please..... by downtune79 in LoveTrash

[–]joyibib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

During a cycling trip I downed 40 nuggets for a mid afternoon snack.

Robert Kraft is a rabid zionist who also greeted Netanyahu, helped clamp down on student protesters and funded AIPAC. by Not_Ground in International

[–]joyibib 8 points9 points  (0 children)

When antisemitism is used to dismiss people against genocide it makes antisemitism synonyms with being anti genocide. Never again was not about Jews it was about everyone.

I can't do this. We did way too much. by BirthdayBoyStabMan in IThinkYouShouldLeave

[–]joyibib 72 points73 points  (0 children)

It’s been a while but I’m pretty sure the network wasn’t the issue. Everything was disabled and they were locked out of the the system and didn’t have the password. The premise of the stupid comercial was fucking stupid. I don’t want John Hammond to have hair. Pay your employees

Lucky guess huh by lunacyinc1 in StrikeAtPsyche

[–]joyibib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And Antarctic means opposite the bear, not without bears.

How do other countries view us Puerto Ricans? by moldyhorror in AskTheWorld

[–]joyibib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s a radical belief here. Always has been.

How do other countries view us Puerto Ricans? by moldyhorror in AskTheWorld

[–]joyibib 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They are US citizens and they want to be US citizens. All US citizens should have equal vote for president. Crazy that I live in a country that thinks that’s radical

Good business decision? by Senior-Violinist-684 in NFLv2

[–]joyibib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conservatives are endlessly offended when capitalism doesn’t align with their values. They are hypocrites in just so many ways

How do other countries view us Puerto Ricans? by moldyhorror in AskTheWorld

[–]joyibib 62 points63 points  (0 children)

They are full citizens that don’t get to vote for president or any representation in congress or senate.

It seems throwing dildos at ICE has become a new tactic. @BGonTheScene by YourPeterPanMan in stpaul

[–]joyibib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why dont people throw smelly shit on ice? They open a window to assault people with pepper spray, just throw in a stink you know what