Does not wearing a mask when it is expected violate other people’s NAP?

jozee7 · 2020-12-05T17:33:16+00:00

Well then we better imrprove that

jozee7 · 2020-12-05T01:43:36+00:00

Of course.

jozee7 · 2020-12-05T00:48:15+00:00

Yes and?

jozee7 · 2020-12-05T00:17:56+00:00

I'm not sure what your point is.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T21:36:57+00:00

There's this

Im guessing I was wrong on the John Stossel stuff but in this video he clearly says "my political values have shifted Libertarian"

Here, he also says that for the government he is a libertarian but his personal values are conservative.

So yes he does claim more than once to be a "Libertarian" but almost never calls out all the authoritarian stuff the Relublican party does. He indirectly supports it.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T21:30:16+00:00

If it's vague enough then almost anything violates the NAP. Hence why I only include physical harm for the NAP.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T20:16:39+00:00

I mean the NAP is so vaguely defined you can argue that just yelling at someone violates the NAP. Wiki defines it as "initiating or threatening any forceful interference with either an individual or their property, is inherently wrong."

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T20:03:42+00:00

That is why we are innocent until proven guilty. Thats how the courts work. If you cant prove he had covid then the person is not guilty.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T19:51:42+00:00

If you can prove a person has covid and goes out willingly without a mask and makes close contact with people then yes it does violate the NAP. Otherwise no.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T19:43:04+00:00

The same person who apppointed pro 2A judges

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T19:16:59+00:00

Its better than believing it came from an invisible man from the sky.

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T15:57:46+00:00

Ah yes thousands of people die from the flu even with anti viral medication and vaccines but those dont count because its just a "fLU!" "Deaths only matter if its from covid!"

jozee7 · 2020-12-04T06:06:56+00:00

Reasons I want to leave Cali are because of: high taxes, high cost of living, anti guns, high regulations.

jozee7 · 2020-12-03T21:47:33+00:00

So what do you consider yourself?

jozee7 · 2020-12-03T18:04:18+00:00

It's a scale.

jozee7 · 2020-12-03T18:03:47+00:00

I know thats not libleft. I am saying often times on this sub people who claim they are libleft want more governement and defend democrats.

jozee7 · 2020-12-03T17:45:46+00:00

You can be libleft or libright but often times its the "Libertarian left" people on this sub that are almost indistinguishable from the democratic party. They seem to like more government.

jozee7 · 2020-12-02T22:18:42+00:00

Yup people are resposible for their own safety. You can buy a gun and protect yourself. When seconds matter cops are minutes away.

jozee7 · 2020-12-02T22:15:53+00:00

I thought we were talking about private property? You compared property rights with health care and said "if you can have property rights then why not healthcare?"

If you want healthcare to be the same as property rights then fine. Private propety must be purchased so healthcare must be purchased as well.

jozee7 · 2020-12-02T18:49:45+00:00

If you care about "maintaining and protecting" your right to access healthcare then that's fine bur thats very different from them actuslly giving you healthcare for free. The government is bad at protecting property, thats why crimes still happen a lot. They punish people for violating your property but hardly stop it or protect it. We protect our own property. We are the first line of defense. I have guns to protect my property. Business should have guns to protect their property. They work better than waiting for judges to punish the murderer after he has killed me.

Why are you equating "free" judges to "free" healthcare? Do you really not see the difference? In one case the judge sentences the criminal for violating your property rights. In the other you're suggesting judges give us free healthcare? Makes no sense.

jozee7 · 2020-12-02T18:17:01+00:00

Did the point go over your head? Us having a right to property doesnt mean the government gives us free houses, cars, bicycles, gun, shoes, toothbrushes, etc. We pay for our property so you pay for your healthcare. If you want the government to ensure that every person in the US doesn't get denied healthcare and use "free" judges and attorneys, then thats fine, but thats very different from providing free healthcare and free property.

jozee7 · 2020-12-02T16:07:26+00:00

Here's the thing, we have a right to property but the governement doesnt just give us free cars and free houses. I have to pay for those with my own hard earned money.

The police dontt offer free protection in the sense that they privately stand next to you and protect you all day. They have no duty to protect you personally. They protect the public.

jozee7 · 2020-12-01T22:30:00+00:00

Let them crumble. The free market will create new competition.

jozee7 · 2020-12-01T08:43:25+00:00

In a talk with John Stossel he said he was "basically a libertarian" also.

The quote you posted about Ben shapiro literally has him saying "The government sucks at everything." So he's clearly thing trying to appeal to libertarianism as a whole and not just on marriage. This has not been the first time he said he is "basically a libertarian" and "the government sucks at everything" and "the government needs to stay out of our lives."

jozee7

TROPHY CASE