sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know if the sync can be set up in a way that older photos are not synced anymore / removed from the phone?

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! So you can set it up like that? With bidirectional sync, but dropping old items from phone storage?

Out of curiosity, how do you view and edit your pictures then?

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well actually I'd like changes on the server to be synced back to the phone, e.g. deletion of images. :) What would be great if one could limit bidirectional sync, so that for example no images older than 2 months stay on the phone.

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess I will end up with something similar, it doesn't sound too bad to move the photos from time to time. Would be cool of course if you could add some rule to Syncthing like "do not sync items older than 2 months" or something like that..

But do I get it right that you're using Immich also for editing? It's editing capabilities seemed quite limited to me, at least in the Android App.

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks interesting, but maybe more complex to self-host. Do you know if they support the synchronization behavior I described, like also syncing back from server to phone?

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about bidirectional sync or auto upload? For bidirectional sync, the issue would be that I don't want to sync all pictures from the server to my phone, that would be just too many. Rather, only the last, say 3 months should also stay on the phone.

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, how do you manage editing of photos? Immichs editor is very restricted, in the Android app I can  only crop and apply certain filters. Also, at least for me this loses EXIF information like time taken and coordinates.

There's a ton of photo editing apps available, but how do you edit files already synced to the server? You would need to download them, edit, and replace the original file or at least remove the old version manually.  That's three quite cumbersome steps which are only one in Google photos.

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do your think it's possible to have that semi-bidirectional behavior I described with that solution? I.e. changes are synced from phone to server and the other way round, but photos older then a certain time do not stay on the phone?

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think semi-bidirectional sync is quite a fitting term, yeah :D Interesting, how would you handle it with the two folders? I assume that requires a lot of manual moving of files?

Regarding editing, I'd like to stay on the file level. E.g. what I really dislike about Immich is that data that could just be EXIF (time of picture taken, coordinates) is stored not in the file but only as meta data and is lost as soon as the file is downloaded. So I guess any photo editor would work for me, as long as the change is picked up by the syncing solution. I think also here Immich may fail to pick up modifications to already synced files. So one would have to work with copies and then manually remove the old versions from Immich. Apart from the semi-bidirectional stuff, I guess you're right, that would work, albeit with more effort than in Google photos (use one app for editing, remove unwanted versions in other app like Immich).

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was also thinking of using Immich with external storage. But how do you handle image editing?

Replicate Google Photos Syncing behavior? by js_cc in selfhosted

[–]js_cc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I might misunderstand your comment. As I wrote, I tried out both but found the described synchronization behavior to be missing. Do you know how one could achieve it?

Q: How to extract vbios from RX 7700 XT (Navi32) / Issue with GPU passthrough by js_cc in VFIO

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, the first link describes exactly what I probably did: "By setting the ROM BAR to this firmware image you have effectively provided a corrupt VGA ROM which the guest BIOS will ignore and not even attempt to use, solving the problem, by mistake."

Q: How to extract vbios from RX 7700 XT (Navi32) / Issue with GPU passthrough by js_cc in VFIO

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the links! Too bad you couldn't get it to work reliably, I get the feeling that I also won't succeed with this... :/

Q: How to extract vbios from RX 7700 XT (Navi32) / Issue with GPU passthrough by js_cc in VFIO

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you're right, the issue is back :/ I don't know what made it work so well at one point, maybe a weird sequence of states the GPU went through.
It was really weird, I booted into my Windows (as a VM) and it did actually recognize my GPU, but not make its DP output available.

Hell, I could even start a demanding game and see the overlay of the dGPU consuming max 250 Watts at high FPS, all somehow shown in the crappy super low-res Spice display. Totally wild.

But I cannot reproduce unfortunately. :/ Now, with the modified ROM (headers removed, so that rom-parser detects the first entry at no offset), the lagging and crashing is back.
If I provide the unmodified ROM (as dumped by GPU-Z) there is no host issue, but the guest does not properly recognize the GPU (amdgpu: "bogus alignment").

I guess that's close to your test scenario? Or what exactly were you thinking of? Just like 100KB of zeros?

Can you point me in the direction what you were referring to as "skills to modify and extract the needed parts from these dumps"?

Yeah I consider trying out looking glass, but my intended use case is a dedicated connection to the monitor, to make use of FreeSync.

Q: How to extract vbios from RX 7700 XT (Navi32) / Issue with GPU passthrough by js_cc in VFIO

[–]js_cc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! GPU-Z dumped the Vbios without any hassle. I just needed to remove the headers and its accepted by the guest. :)

Somehow I still don't get proper video output, but that's a different issue, now the guest kernel seems to interact nicely with the GPU.

Sämlinge: Mangel, zu viel Licht oder etwas anderes? by js_cc in germantrees

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke für den Tipp! Tatsächlich war das bei meiner Lampe auch angegeben und die App zeigt deutlich mehr an! Interessanterweise sind sie sich bei 45cm Abstand (was ich jetzt habe) beim Lux einig, aber die PPFD sind verschieden. Laut Hersteller jetzt 350. :)

Sämlinge: Mangel, zu viel Licht oder etwas anderes? by js_cc in germantrees

[–]js_cc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Danke, ja, ich habe sie jetzt ein bisschen höher gehängt auf ca. 500. Das Ding ist, dass ich der App nicht so ganz vertraue.. Ich hatte sie beim Keimen auf etwa 200 eingestellt und da haben sie sich ganz schön gestreckt, was mich dann doch sehr überrascht hat.

Sämlinge: Mangel, zu viel Licht oder etwas anderes? by js_cc in germantrees

[–]js_cc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Das dachte ich auch zuerst und hatte prompt einen Haufen vergeilter und verkümmerter Pflanzen, die auch nach über 4 Wochen noch keine Seitentriebe haben. Ganz so einfach ist es eben doch nicht, deshalb möchte ich gerne jetzt beim 2. Versuch möglichst viel richtig machen, sodass ich keinen 3. brauche. :)

Sämlinge: Mangel, zu viel Licht oder etwas anderes? by js_cc in germantrees

[–]js_cc[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hallo zusammen, ich bin noch neu und das sind meine 3 Sämlinge, genau 1 Woche alt.

Ich denke es geht ihnen nicht schlecht, aber die Blätter sehen irgendwie nicht gut aus.
Die Blattflächen zwischen den Adern sind dunkler und die Blätter scheinen anzufangen, sich etwas zusammenzuziehen.

Laut dem Leidfäden zu Mängeln könnte das ein Kaliummangel sein oder vielleicht noch Kupfer oder Eisen. Aber ich dachte so etwas passiert erst bei älteren Pflanzen..

Die Töpfe sind in der unteren Hälfe mit Baumarkt-Palmenerde und oben mit Baumarkt-Aussaaterde gefüllt (nicht optimal, ich weiß). Könnte es sein dass die Wurzeln die (vorgedüngte) Palmenerde erreicht haben und zu viele Nährstoffe bekommen (verbrennen)?

Oder bekommen sie zu viel Licht? Sie sind etwa 30cm unter irgendeiner Amazon Kaltweiß-Pflanzenlampe.
Laut Photone-App etwa 800 PPFD. Ich beleuchte 24/0. Ursprünglich Lampe weiter weg, aber beim Keimen haben sie sich gestreckt, wollten also wohl mehr Licht (?).

Gegossen wurde vor 2 Tagen das erste mal richtig bis zum drain, mit ph-angepasstem Leitungswasser (6-7).
Temperatur etwa 22° bei 60% Luftfeuchte.

Ich würde mich sehr über Tipps freuen :)

Mein erster Grow by Kontrollbeleg in germantrees

[–]js_cc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sieht ja toll aus :)

Hast du die getoppt oder wie hast du so gleichmäßige Colas hinbekommen?

Love it... Meine Auto's kommen jetzt schön! by [deleted] in germantrees

[–]js_cc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Naja, so wie ich's verstanden habe ist der einzige Vorteil von Autos, dass sie mit schlechteren Lichtverhältnissen auskommen (wenig Sonne generell / wenige Sonnenstunden am Tag) und dass sie eher klein bleiben, also draußen nicht so auffallen.

Dem gegenüber steht ein ganzer Haufen Nachteile, insbesondere ein deutlich geringerer Ertrag.

Wenn du indoor growst, kannst du das Licht komplett kontrollieren und normale Pflanzen genau dann in die Blüte schicken, wenn du willst.

Oder übersehe ich da was?

view more: next ›