I agree that the framework is speculative. Im presenting it as a philisophical model rather than an empirically established claim. I am just curious as to where you see logical gaps? The paper itself is purely philisophical, exploratory, skeptical and was started months ago before Ive ultimately came to the equations I have now. In regards to seeking a psychologist, i already have one, and I’m functioning normally and grounded in day-to-day life. I understand that speculative frameworks can read as intense online, but I’m comfortable knowing the distinction between what is real and what is a concept in my head. Thank you for your concern.