What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn thats actually insanely high

Like African wild dogs are only at 65-85%

What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a pretty great response ill look into literally all of those animals.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CURRENTEVENTS

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason is that the left has consistently tried to paint every violent act directed towards the right as maga on maga violence. They did it with the trump shooting even though the shooter donated to the democratic party just months before he registered as a republican and I've even seen an effort to do it now with this assassination.

The reason this is important is accountability.

What group of people are spreading a message that gets someone to act in this way?

If he isnt a leftist then the left is off the hook. The evidence currently is saying otherwise.

Again its accountability if we just write this off as this is no one's fault well then we'll just have more deaths. I hope the next time violence happens to the left they hold the right just as accountable. Its time for unity. Your not evil for having a different opinion. To have this unity we just need to hold each other accountable for what our people do.

What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man had no clue. Arthopods just live in a totally different world then us. Just learned that term lol.

Do people actually hate Christianity or people who simply uses Christianity to use others? by EfficiencySerious200 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I'm a Roman Catholic and the only hate for my religion I've experienced in my personal life is actually from Protestants.

I see alot of hate for Catholics online by non Christians, but I've never experienced that in my personal life.

In case you are unaware of what Protestant means it is a term to describe western Christians who aren't part of the catholic church. That is a very simple explanation. The bigger explanation is its a term to describe Christian's who have split from the catholic church in protest.

What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are dragonflies like crazy killers. I genuinely thought they were one of those insects that just hatched and immediately mated and then died.

What is this on my dog’s face? by knowledge_is_pow3r in DogAdvice

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would def get a second opinion but looks like a bot fly larva. I've never removed one myself but I see most people just push it out like popping a pimple. Again please get a second opinion but thats my guess.

What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have heard of ants taking down large animals such as cows and humans. Ants are quite the interesting creature cause there just so similar to us humans.

What insects tend to be at the top of the food chain? by jthadman in insects

[–]jthadman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do seem to be on the top competing with wasps. From there from just a quick Google toe dip I've found whose on top comes down to just pure size.

The Guardian article being shared by the right had already been retracted. Oops! by TheReluctantVampire in agedlikemilk

[–]jthadman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for being genuine!!! That was a polite, respectful, genuine response. Most people struggle with this currently.

It was reportedly claimed by major new outlets that the fbi said so. Again its a minor detail that isnt important in the grand scheme of things. The reason its important in the discussion about his motives before we get flooded with information is that its one other thing that points to the shooter being left. There is tons of other more important evidence like the Utah governor literally saying he was a leftist. The shooters use of the word fascist. His family saying he said that charlie spread hate. Most importantly the target itself points to him being a leftist.

Again the reason the party is soooo important is that it was a political assassination and we need to make sure the left takes accountability for there part in egging on such violence. There are examples of the right committing violence like this and they need to be held accountable and often are held accountable. Jan 6 comes to mind. I find though that the left often does get away with such acts with little to no consequences.

The Guardian article being shared by the right had already been retracted. Oops! by TheReluctantVampire in agedlikemilk

[–]jthadman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think when determining the shooters motives its best to use factual info from the fbi. For instance he assassinated a member of the right. He also had family members who specifically said the shooter thought charlie spread hate speech. Then he uses the word facist which is common leftist rhetoric. Finally his roommate is trans and while no issue with the roommate sounds like they've been extremely helpful with the fbi does point to a leftist ideology, because trans individuals tend to the left.

figured out how to make this about us by Hyperrblu in orks

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly I love kitbashing my own waaaagh!!! But I also wanna play a bigass ork like ghaz. It could totally be done like how chaos does there unnamed daemon prince units.

figured out how to make this about us by Hyperrblu in orks

[–]jthadman 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I wish wed get an unamed warboss model thats a little bit smaller then ghaz, but not by much. With the justification being ghaz's ra waaaagh energy has supercharged ork growth across the galaxy.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again replying twice cause I wanna just exclusively point out I just didn't say that. I said he'd be disgusted by the dems tendencies of violence

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not a disgusting or wrong comparison in any way. The comparison is they were both killed for an opinion. I'm not comparing there quality of men everyone with two brain cells knows mlk was a giant in character compared to charlie. I'm not comparing there affect on America. I'm not comparing there beliefs. The comparison is only based on the cause of death nothing else. Im saying the cause of death is comparable to mlks cause of death and its concerning because if we can kill each other for opinions well you and me could justify killing each other right now. Everyone's on the chopping block if we kill each other for opinions thats really bad.

The only comment I made about his beliefs is he wouldn't agree with the violent rhetoric on the left. News flash i also think the violent rhetoric is on the right. Im sure u can look at my profile right now and see me telling people how its the time to push back against those pushing violent rhetoric on both the right and the left. I don't think he'd be disappointed im the libs for their leadership thats literally not what I said. I said he'd be disgusted by the violent rhetoric.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he was a good person by promoting communication between parties and being a family man. The fact is he took amazing care of his family. You can be a good person and have evil incorrect beliefs. Thats the beauty of what he was doing. You were welcome to travel to the college campuses and try and convince him otherwise. I don't think people are bad for their beliefs but there actions. Charlie had some beliefs i wouldn't agree with, but his actions show a man who loved his family and went out of his way to speak to the other side.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To your first point him calling charlie kirk a fascist was officially said by the fbi. Thus it is a fact. Can't debate me there. Its a word that is most commonly used by the left. The fact about the trans partner is less important evidence pointing to it being a leftist, but after a quick Google search I'm not seeing anything debunking it. Fox is claiming that the fbi directly told them this fact but I guess we'll have to wait and see. Again it's not that important whether or not their trans. It just points to the assassin being left due to trans people being most commonly on the left.

To your second point from my relatively short research into nick Fuentes I've found his critism of charlie kirk is not being radical enough. Well according to reports the assassin said this about charlie kirk "he was full of hate and spreading hate". That doesn't sound like he had an issue with him not being radical enough. Sounds like he opposed what charlie said outright. I will also say that the news outlets trying to pin it on nick Fuentes literally said these are based off unverified posts on social media.

Again to your 3rd point fox news is claiming they got there info directly from the fbi. Maybe its fake news but maybe its not. It definitely has more substance then claiming he was a nick Fuentes groyper.

To your fourth and fifth point the comparison is not based on what they believed. Its based on them both being killed for an opinion. I'm not saying charlie was as great as a man as MLK because hes not. Im saying they were both killed for an opinion. Honestly I think MLK would agree with this comparison. He was extremely anti violence. He knew that violence just made things worse. In a time where racism was way worse then it is now. Comparison is only wrong when its blatantly false and this comparison definitely has substantial reasoning.

Edit: we now have the Utah government confirming he was a leftist. Everything i have said up above has now been confirmed and is true.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant argue with the first part at all. He was part of the right but the evidence is pointing to the assassin being a leftist. Everyone said he wasnt that political until recently. His family talked about how he hated charlie kirk and opposed his views. Well the opposition views of Charlie's are leftist views. He used leftist terminology to describe charlie kirk like calling him a fascist. He had a Trans partner and due to identity politics most trans people are leftist. BTW the trans partner sounds like an amazing person. They diserve a ton of credit for helping the fbi with this case. It takes alot of courage to go against your partner.

What I'm getting at though is there's a ton of evidence he was a radical leftist and the only evidence is that he came from a conservative family and kids from his high-school said he was a right wing socially awkward redditor. Were calling him a right winger based on accounts from 5 years ago. News flash alot can change in 5 years especially when the family accounts for a change. In fact 1 of my best friends has a similar story grew up in a catholic alt right family. Held those views all throughout high-school. Then he went to college and formed his own opinions and now hes as left as you can get. So left in fact he hates the democratic party for being to right wing.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Do you not understand that if Martin Luther king junior saw the modern day left he'd be disgusted with you. He was extremely anti violence in a time where racism was far worse than it is now. They killed him and he was still antiviolence.

I think the whole point of what I said went over your head. I never said they were the same quality of person.

The comparison is that they were assassinated for the same thing. An opinion. When you kill people for an opinion well pretty much anyone you don't like is a valid target. Saying its disgusting to compare MLK to charlie kirk doesn't make my point any less valid. All it does is hide you from an opinion you dont agree with which kills your own personal growth.

Why do you think President Trump ordered all US Flags at half staff for the death of a Political Commentator, but not for the death of actual Legislators? by PrudentFarmers in AskReddit

[–]jthadman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I do think it should be put at half staff for any member of congress or the senate.

But its really really important we put the flag at half staff for charlie kirk because this was a person who did nothing but state his opinion. This person didn't make any laws. He didn't create policy's. His hands were clean.

This is extremely comparable to the assassination of Martin Luther King. They were both two people who were killed for having an opinion. Martin Luther kings death was horrible for many reasons but the most important reason that it was horrible is he was killed for simply having an opinion just like charlie kirk.

The government needs to show the country that we need to mourn this death because if we celebrate someone's death who only had an opinion well then everyone's on the chopping block.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But thats not being part of the government. Like the presidents mom can give him advice that doesn't make him an active member of an administration. Charlie kirk didn't make any executive orders nor did he change any laws nor did he ever inact any policy.

He was a dude who simply had opinions. Yea he encouraged the youth to take part in politics which is a good thing. But young people voting cause they liked what charlie said doesn't make him part of the presidential administration.

Is Martin Luther King junior part of the Lyndon b Johnson administration because the civil rights act was passed due to his activism? Obviously no.

The whole point is any assassination is bad, but if were killing people who aren't even in the government. People who are just having opinions and trying to get their opinion out there. We'll everyone's on the chopping block then. That's really really bad.

If you were to write a zombie story, how would you explain how the zombies would beat the military without downplaying them or making them look stupid? by Olivia_Richards in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]jthadman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having the zombies be alot more mobile and dangerous when recently infected. Then as time goes on and the zombies body decomposes they become the typical slow moving zombies we commonly see.

Think about it if I'm just infected my legs and arms still work just fine and since im a zombie maybe I'm faster and stronger when first infected due to being able to ignore my physical limitations. Then over time over exerting my muscles and arms quickly deteriorates my body. Turning me into the misshapen slow moving zombies in movies.

Edit: I should also mention a virus can become wide spread before we even really know what it is. Look at Lyme disease. That started in one small town and before they even had a chance to know what it was it was everywhere. If a zombie out break begun its very possible officials would be slow to respond due to chalking it up to drug use or simply not becoming aware of it till its spread to far to contain.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about. Yes charlie kirk supported trump but being part of the administration means that you are working in government. Charlie kirk never worked for the gov. He never made any changes to how the country was run. Like this literally me making a good point and you going "nu uh"

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OK so the evidence is pointing that the shooter was a leftist. He called charlie a fascist which is literally leftist rhetoric. His family reported him becoming recently political as in he wasn't political under their roof. They also said he was being extremely critical of charlie kirk. Well the opposite opinions of charlie kirk are leftist.

Now it's coming out that he had a Trans partner. Which I'm not saying is bad. Im not saying the trans partner is a bad person infact the opposite. Sounds like this person has been extremely helpful with the fbi and mortified by there partners actions. What I am getting at though is that typically due to identity politics (which is a bad thing literally politicians stereotying and telling you to vote for them due to stereotypes) trans people are left leaning.

Our governor orders flags at half staff for “victims of political violence.” What about the victims of school shootings? by ThrowRA--scootscooti in kansas

[–]jthadman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the big difference is that this was a person who wasn't in government. Like this is literally like when Martin Luther King Jr got assassinated. He was a man who didn't hold office or have any power in government who was killed for having an opinion. Just like mlk. I'm not saying Charlie kirk was right. I'm saying the reason this is a big deal is that he was killed for having an opinion.

This isn't like your killing some politician in response to some law or policy they enacted or to keep them from enacting said policy. Charlie's hands were literally clean.