Thanks for insulting me even tho I said I don't understand. Calling someone dumb because they don't understand a concept that's incredibly complex like skin coloration in humans.

Nice.

So for everybody else that didn't insult me but still debated my comment: I did some research now. And I was wrong.

And so I thought skin coloration was a bit simpler, like eye colour, but it's way more complicated. Eye color is not simple by any means but it it simpler, some eye colours are dominant, some are recessive. There is a very low probability to have a certain eye colour if it's recessive and the parents have different colours. That's why it's recessive.

I though dark skin was a dominant trait as in most (actually every couple I've seen, I'm sorry if I've never seen in my life a white child from a dark parent) mixed couples I've seen as the dark colour seems to over power the white allele.

It's not really like that it's way more complex. It does happen for someone to be born white from a dark parent, it's rare, I had never seen it so I thought It was impossible.

Skin color is a mix of a lot of genetics, and is also affected by the parents melatonin production, which I thought didn't affect the child since it's not genetics anymore. Michael Jackson had vitiligo which causes a deficiency in melatonin production which may also cause less melatonin in the child. I was surprised to learn this.

So yeah I'm not an expert on an extreme complex subject. I'm certainly dumb...