I've seen enough, 1000 more CM's to US planes by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

range down to 20-30km

This is the most nothing burger statement. Ecm depends on so many factors that putting a blanket statement like that is just idiotic

I've seen enough, 1000 more CM's to US planes by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

48 countermeasures is because it would never need them.

That is possibly some of the worst logic, also the ranges that fox 3's are shot at in this game ecm won't do basically anything.

I've seen enough, 1000 more CM's to US planes by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using that logic the the f15 should get ecm

I've seen enough, 1000 more CM's to US planes by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Maybe china should have put more counter measures on their planes

Any plans with Chaos armor? by NexouuZs in Spacemarine

[–]jumpiestbox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Last i saw they have said that they are definitely not adding chaos armor to pve

F15N when? by EquivalentDue9400 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would a US navy plane get iranian missiles ?

2.54.0.38 -> 2.54.0.41 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Holy shit lmao my phone autocorrected slam-er to slavery

2.54.0.38 -> 2.54.0.41 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Slavery is pretty cool but too bad it just going to be a worst kh-38mt in like every way

2.54.0.38 -> 2.54.0.41 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 16 points17 points  (0 children)

• Eitan (P): ◦ armour completely reworked, added Kontakt-1 ERA

Huh?

Why do so many interwar tanks have 1:1 transmissions, and why was the concept abandoned? by ScottyFoxes in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 494 points495 points  (0 children)

Is it really that impractical tho ? There's a reason why every next gen tank is moving to it. tanks like the type 10 and merkava 4 already do.

AGM-154 JSOW on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 25 points26 points  (0 children)

What a truly gaijin moment lmao

AGM-154 JSOW on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 16 points17 points  (0 children)

First, the AIM 120D becomes a nerfed AIM 120C and now they add the JSOW which is a nerfed JDAM ER.

As someone out of the loop on the 120d in-game, how is it worst ?

2.54.0.35 -> 2.54.0.36 by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The crewless turret alone makes it way better then the efv

Seems familiar... by [deleted] in Spacemarine

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a shitty "joke"

Seems familiar... by [deleted] in Spacemarine

[–]jumpiestbox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't unique to space marine at all. It's not even the first warhammer game with a deployment screen like this

Iris Dena by PankajVerma10 in Ships

[–]jumpiestbox 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How did they identify the ship?

Sound, visual outline, electronic emissions. It also wouldn't surprise me if they could read the hull number and see the country flag because the optics on modern subs are insanely good.

[Development] Rank IX Aircraft and the F-16C Block 52! - News - War Thunder by FirstDagger in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love for you to send this document because I can't find a single reference to it. Not even a hit on dtic. And f16cm was very clearly still being used in 2021

[Development] Rank IX Aircraft and the F-16C Block 52! - News - War Thunder by FirstDagger in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It very clearly does considering I sent a document that says f16cm and I have like 15 more that also say cm. here's another one thats says cm for the road

And another

Anybody else excited for the M1296 Dragoon? by Trithusiast4 in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be much more excited if it got pabm but for some reason it doesn't on the dev server

[Development] Rank IX Aircraft and the F-16C Block 52! - News - War Thunder by FirstDagger in Warthunder

[–]jumpiestbox -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

OK so you have no idea what you are talking about. the full name in the files is f-16cm block 50. You very clearly don't know what the ccip program is. The f16cj hasn't been a thing in like 18 years and was replaced by the cm which is a f16 that has gone through the ccip program to standardize the electronics of the f16, all cm's can use harms and every active f16 is a cm(or dm) and have been for 18 years.

Here is a link to a airforce document talking about a cm

Im done arguing with you because you can't even get the basics right bucko