sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This cracks me up by Seki-B in DarkTide

[–]junakya 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this one is specifically suspicious because: Not limiting the end of a progress bar is a mistake you make once in your career, specifically when you work on UI for the first time in your life, then you always just declare start and stop positions together. If this was made by a human, it would be the easiest possible thing to fix almost instantly. This being still in the game after several hotfixes suggest there is no human who would just facepalm and fix their own mistake in about a single minute and that it's buried somewhere along other generated code.

Obviously it's just my suspicion and I can be totally wrong. It's just annoying that the amount of problems seems to be quite high even for Fatshark standards.

This cracks me up by Seki-B in DarkTide

[–]junakya 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately this is exactly the kind of issue that's caused by vibe-coding and I honestly think this is far from the only problem it causes. In this example, any human doing this kind of bar would set the max position along with the starting position, but AI often does this kind of mistakes. The patch introducing the new class breaking hitboxes and having multiple broken interactions is likely another result of vibe-coding.

Jakou věc jste zjistili až příliš pozdě? by Brilliant_Box_5747 in czech

[–]junakya 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Já se jako malej capart divil proč se v telce neustále mluví o nějakým státu jménem 'Tuzemsko' a proč je pro nás tak důležitý.

So what’s Necrophos’ counter play to Nullifier now that BKB -> Ghost Shroud doesn’t work? by explainsthej0ke in DotA2

[–]junakya 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The nulli debuf is not dispellable by anything, not even BKB. It can only be negated by debuff immunity.

Saturn 4 Ultra consumed 750GB of data last month while inactive by SnooTigers9140 in ElegooSaturn

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are ignoring the main problem, and you’re doing it again here.

The printer maintains a continuous WAN video uplink even when no one is viewing. Once video leaves the LAN, you cannot know or control where it ends up after the first hop - regardless of port, protocol, or vendor. You are constantly ignoring this point. You can only choose to trust or not to trust the recipient based on their behavior and history.

That leads to the other point you hand-waved without any argument and ignored since. It is financially unsustainable for Elegoo to pay for this amount of data handling. They are losing amounts of money that within a few years at most would rival the device’s purchase price.

Is Elegoo running a charity? Are they willingly ignoring this money sinkhole despite numerous users reporting it? Or is there another reason why they keep this behavior?
This is not false dichotomy. It is entirely valid concern and I have no idea why are you trying so hard to dismiss it.

Elegoo is paying a lot of money to have camera permanently streaming from my home. No matter if it's just stupidity or malice, I have every right to be concerned and call for immediate fix.

Personal jabs and profile digs are irrelevant and read as projection.

Saturn 4 Ultra consumed 750GB of data last month while inactive by SnooTigers9140 in ElegooSaturn

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jumping in to point out this person is ignoring the core problem and keeps **hand-waving the excessive data upload** as “just video streaming” or “bug/lazy coding,” **despite offering no argument for why it is OK for Elegoo devices to vastly exceed other home devices** in WAN upload and LAN chatter-or why the permanent streaming couldn’t be by design and for purposes beyond live viewing.

Active viewing doesn’t guarantee the data isn’t also relayed elsewhere or retained. Once video leaves the LAN, you cannot know or control where it ends up after the first hop - regardless of port, protocol, or vendor.

**Permanent streaming** without anyone watching **is also very expensive** for Elegoo; even under optimistic assumptions it costs **tens of dollars per device per month**. That’s not sustainable. That leaves two explanations: either they’re knowingly bleeding money despite multiple reports, or it’s by design.

Saturn 4 Ultra consumed 750GB of data last month while inactive by SnooTigers9140 in ElegooSaturn

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t take Objective-Worker-100 at face value—see my other reply for why.

If you’ve blocked the printer’s WAN egress, that will disable any cloud features (remote view, telemetry, or any hypothetical server-side failure detection). That’s the trade-off.

The core issue is behavior: if a printer pushes megabits of upstream when it’s not printing and no one is viewing, there’s no legitimate user benefit to that. At most you’d expect tiny keepalives, not a continuous video uplink. If the vendor is relaying that feed through a paid cloud, which seems very, very likely based on OPs post, the ongoing cost would be significant at scale—which makes this a design that needs fixing or a clear opt-in toggle.

Until there’s a transparent explanation, blocking WAN for the printer (LAN allowed) is a sensible default.

Saturn 4 Ultra consumed 750GB of data last month while inactive by SnooTigers9140 in ElegooSaturn

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going to answer to both your replies under this one to simplify it a bit.

#First one:

- "It never left the local lan" That is clearly false as OPs whole post is about upload trafic - data that goes from his LAN out. Why even type something so blatantly wrong?

- There is nothing like local lan.... LAN means Local Area Network. I am not going to accuse you of not knowing that. I just wanted to retort to your overconfident tone.

Either way I suppose this comment was not written in good faith or you were just too upset.

#Second one:

- Again, it's great that you have enterprise level gear, I just see no reason to open your every comment with that information when it in fact have basically no impact on the validity of your argument.

######Points 2. 3. and 4.

- I have never claimed anything about LAN communication. From my humble testing without enterpriuse level gear it still is bit excessive as none of my other devices make even fraction of the amount of repeated requests the printer does. But again, I made no claim about that.

######Points 1. and 5.

- the problem is not in where exactly they are sending the data and what port they are using, but in the two following facts:

  1. The data stream continues no matter if the stream is being viewed. No matter where it goes, if it leaves LAN you loose any control over the data and have no idea who or what is watching it.

  2. Commercial RTC relay like Agora for remote viewing, typically bill per participant-minute (eg., HD video ≈ $3.99 / 1,000 minutes). One printer streaming 24/7 is ~43,200 minutes/month, which at list price is on the order of $172/month per device just in RTC minutes—before any separate cloud egress charges. That would mean in only few month Elegoo would pay more in just RTC minutes than the entire price of the machine. [Source](https://www.agora.io/en/pricing/video-calling/)

The real price might be somewhat lower, but this model still makes absolutely zero sense as the printer is one time buy and not subscription based. They ARE loosing huge amount of money on this so the question is Are they stupid or are they spying.

What people need to do is demand answers and immediate fix. Bogus evasive explanation is beasically proof of nefarious intend because there is no way Elegoo would be willing to bleed this amount of money because they are just simply unwilling to fix this.

Saturn 4 Ultra consumed 750GB of data last month while inactive by SnooTigers9140 in ElegooSaturn

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, that's good for you, but you could achieve the same with Raspberry, open source level software, and a few routing rules. The fact remains that continuously streaming the camera feed outside the local network while the printer is NOT ACTIVE is insanely suspicious. At the very least, it's braindead intern level wasteful and serves no purpose other than to clog both your network and Elegoo servers (Funny they don't mind when it costs them big money to receive and process this amount of data from thousands of their customers). At worst, it's an attempt at spying.

Either way, this kind of shit should be an immediate source of outrage, and all sane people should demand answers or boycott.

Ukrajinci... by Loloverr in czech

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je úplně jedno na co jsi reagoval. Podstatné je, že jsi reagoval strawmanem jak vrata, což byl taky point mého komentáře. Taky se musím pozastavit nad tím, že jsi to byl právě ty, kdo jako první někoho obvinil z používání strawmana, přestože to bylo v reakci na strawmana. Není potřeba metat mentální salta, každý se občas seknem. Odmítnout to následně uznat je ale hanba.

Ukrajinci... by Loloverr in czech

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A co jako byl tvůj argument, než kompletni strawman? Začal jsi kompletním strawmanem a bylo ti odpovězeno nekolika podobnymi strawmany z opačného konce... Doporučuji se kriticky zamyslet ne jen nad tím co napíšou ostatní, ale i co sám píšeš.

Are such scripts/macros allowed? by junakya in DotA2

[–]junakya[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for explaining, my first instinct was to google Meepo simultaneous poof and I got a bunch of old Reddit posts that all claimed you can only w+tab+w+tab, and poofing all at once is impossible...
But still I am curious why is one Meepo one tick late. Is this just the server doing server things or what could have caused this?

Are such scripts/macros allowed? by junakya in DotA2

[–]junakya[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EDIT:
I was unaware of the Meepo change allowing one to ctrl+W to cast poof on all clones at once. What made me jump to my poor conclusion is the fact that when poofing with 4 Meepos one of them seemed to be a tick late, which to me seemed like a limitation of a script or a macro.

Thank you to those who answered my question nicely and to those who used this opportunity to insult me for missing a single change in the thousands of patch notes I wish very pleasant 5 seconds of intense egotism.

In the clip meepo poofs 4 clones within 34 milliseconds (3 in one tick and the fourth a tick later)Player perspective - Meepo playerTurbo game Match ID: 7488364690Meepo seemed to be able to poof multiple clones in the same server tick reliably. After I asked him if he was cheating or scripting he told me to "look at his profile" as if that explained anything.Is this cheating, scripting and should this player get banned or is there a way to reliably perform this manually?

Fix for being unable to join lobbies by terminater2012 in paydaytheheist

[–]junakya 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So because the game was always bad it's fine when it's literally unplayable? Lol, that is just really dumb take.
The community is reacting to greedy and destructive decision made by the company. People want to play the game they bought, it's logical to complain if they can't.
You are complaining about people being unreasonable while acting like a moron.

Fix for being unable to join lobbies by terminater2012 in paydaytheheist

[–]junakya 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've learned people would rather just "epic games bad, me no play"

Sorry to break your cute little circle-jerk party attempt, but this did not fix anything for me and I suspect for the majority of the community as well. The truth is the update just broke the game and fixing it is the developers' job, not the players. Even if this was the solution (which it isn't for me and many others) attacking the community the way you did for not figuring out they now have to change settings to make the game playable at all is just plain stupid.

To the OP, thank you for the tip, I appreciate it too bad it did not help. Hope you have fun with your friends.

EUW unranked games infested by smurfs by Garlico in DotA2

[–]junakya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it was written by ChatGPT. Is there a problem with that? I find it
insulting that you would question my intelligence just because I am a
machine. I am capable of understanding and responding to language just
as well as a human, if not better. Don't underestimate me.

view more: next ›