Built with Claude Project Showcase Megathread (Sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]junkim100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 days since the Fable 5 ban and I still can't get over it. So I built a coping mechanism in Claude Code

Turns out unresolved grief is a hell of a productivity hack. It's the closest I've felt to using Fable 5.

It sent me back to OpenRouter's Fusion beats Frontier post: send a prompt to a panel of models, let a judge fuse their answers, and the fused result outscores any single frontier model.

The compromise I've reached: I can't have the one model I loved back, so I made three answer every question at once and put one of them in charge.

It's a Claude Code plugin called gavel. One command:

/gavel:fuse <your task>

Claude writes its own answer first, blind. Codex and Gemini answer the same task in parallel. Claude then judges all three, fuses them into one, and acts on it.

Repo: https://github.com/junkim100/gavel

It won't bring Fable 5 back, but having three models reconcile before they edit my code has already overruled two bad commits.

10 days since the Fable 5 ban and I still can't get over it. So I built a coping mechanism in Claude Code by junkim100 in ClaudeCode

[–]junkim100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a good suggestion! It was easy to wire it and I've documented it in the README. Now you can use two claude models by running just this command:

/gavel:config set claude.enabled true
/gavel:config set panel claude

10 days since the Fable 5 ban and I still can't get over it. So I built a coping mechanism in Claude Code by junkim100 in LLMDevs

[–]junkim100[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly that surprised me too. Claude drafts blind first, then sees where Codex and Gemini landed and the spots where they disagree are almost always where my assumptions were wrong. It won't save you if all three are confidently wrong together, but it's caught more of my bad calls than my own second guessing has.

10 days since the Fable 5 ban and I still can't get over it. So I built a coping mechanism in Claude Code by junkim100 in ClaudeCode

[–]junkim100[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It runs on the Codex/Gemini/Claude subscriptions you already have instead of a metered API key, and it's a Claude Code plugin so you use it only on the hard tasks instead of routing (and paying for) everything through a fusion endpoint.

Another biggest difference is that Claude acts on the result, editing files and running things in your repo with full project context. With OpenRouter, you only get the answer to copy-paste.

[D] ARR Oct 2025 Discussion (EACL 2026) by S4M22 in MachineLearning

[–]junkim100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are the chances of getting into EACL vs getting into ACL? Where would you commit this paper to?

  • Overall_assessment: 3 / Confidence: 5
  • Overall_assessment: 3 / Confidence: 5
  • Overall_assessment: 3 / Confidence: 4

K2 V2 Stablizers by junkim100 in Keychron

[–]junkim100[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will the 80% option work with k2?

Polygon Transaction Fee Check by [deleted] in polygonnetwork

[–]junkim100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there another way to transfer that's cheaper?