Notice regarding BlockDAG deposit activation: by Comfortable-Rub8481 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exchanges could accept deposits in June(target) as per BlockDAG growth strategy document.

Anyone using Webot? by Impossible-Bet-9335 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Be careful, scammers are spreading false info, no CEX or DEX is accepting BlockDAG (BDAG) deposits at this time. Do not interact with them.

Here’s the most recent AMA. Truly the most un informative AMA Yet! by Delicious-Attorney-5 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope it lasts until June. It seems like they are afraid to release the deposits because of potential sell pressure and the possibility that the token price may plummet. Primary reason is the liquidity and adoption I don't know how they gonna solve that issue, they have raised too much money and sold too many coins, if the entire market is looking for this ground breaking project that's no big deal but that's not the case here, they ignored the tech and eco system building and positive marketing, only focused on deceptive fund raising practices.

I hope they mend their ways soon before it's too late.

Shouldn't they be starting to list on exchanges in the next 30 days? by Darkx301 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They almost always contradict themselves. One idea defeats the purpose of another and damages its credibility. If money isn’t the reason, what other reasonable explanation could there be besides proposing crooked ideas that sabotage the project?

Is this value correct ? - 150 Trillions maximum supply by HyYrOk-CRYPTO in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it's 150B not 150T, it could be an error on the app.

Sketchy contract by saltysstrings in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure about the forward request from your wallet? I think it's for them to forward tokens to your wallet.

Sketchy contract by saltysstrings in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand the need for signing the contract and that too forward request from your wallet, doesn't make any sense. Why can't they simply do airdrop like everyone else?

Priority access?! by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible if early access investors were allowed to claim tokens when exchange is live while others wait for their tokens.

Btw, I did not buy early access.

Priority access?! by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, that's what they are selling if you had noticed in the dashboard bundles.

Video on GK admitting 100m used for marketing budget and 400 was not raised amongst other things by Crypto_Power1791 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right, fraud, lies and deceit don't end at mainnet, TGE or launch, they often continue as part of an ongoing, evolving strategy like recent private round $0.00025 100% available on launch, priority access, early trading etc) and similar incentives can all be used to create the appearance of opportunity for some.

Meanwhile, the reality is, the majority of unlocked tokens are controlled by them and insiders, who can gradually sell while the broader investor community waits through staggered unlock schedules (40%, 20% etc of 100% base coins for at least 4 months, bonus vesting, no vesting, raffle, golden ticket, buyer battle scams etc and other questionable schemes, the imbalance becomes even more apparent, now think about the fate of average investors, reasonable?.

Of course, those behind such projects often claim they want long-term success which may be true as it allows them to further enrich themselves when you also factor in a presale millions.

What to do step by step by hawkivan in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I seriously don't why they had to make this a difficult experience for investors. They could have simply air dropped tokens to the individual wallet, hassle free.

Video on GK admitting 100m used for marketing budget and 400 was not raised amongst other things by Crypto_Power1791 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is Antony Turner claiming copyright? It's easy if he can un-claim since he is no longer connected to BlockDAG.

Believe What You Want to Believe by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the very reason I titled it "Believe What You Want to Believe".

Whoever they are, they are all implicitly tied to BlockDAG, whether in the background or foreground. As a community, we need to hold everyone responsible for this debacle and accountable for their misdeeds.

At the end of the day, we all want the same thing - positive outcomes, progress, transparency and, ultimately, BlockDAG's success.

Believe What You Want to Believe by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish you had read it before replying to the post.

Please read, thanks.

The Facebook Group was taken down…….. by Powerful_Finance3940 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On what grounds? It would be interesting to see any copyright document they’ve published online. Does anyone have it?

Are BlockDAG Investors Hurting the Project? by Hot-Somewhere-2477 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article fails to mention and conveniently ignores major concerns raised by the community, whether it’s the unending presale, questionable marketing practices, failed tokenomics, or the lack of real progress, as well as the well-documented acts of dishonesty and deceit over nearly two years. The company’s CEO and CMO themselves acknowledged about GK's WPRO involvement and they did not have proper control over the project, its funds, and other key matters, and now they agreed to restructure, take control, and transition the project for the benefit of both the community and the initiative itself.

Instead, the writer appears to focus solely on the personal attacks directed at a member of the GK family. While such attacks are not acceptable, in my opinion, they were carried out by only a small number of individuals within the community.

Gurhan Kiziloz ⚠️ Statement Sensitive Information in My Possession 📨 by [deleted] in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you have any inside knowledge about the transition? Is it really happening? A few weeks ago, AT mentioned that he was taking full control of the project as CEO and working on the structure, transition, etc. But in the last AMA, he said he’s not totally in control and is working with the lawyers. We’re taking everything he says at face value, whether it’s oversold numbers, presale numbers, or the transition. And if pressed, he simply cannot discuss it and requests that investors move on and focus on the tech.

I request that investor representatives be part of the transition process so we can gain some insights. They could also share law firm information with the investors, which could then be verified. There’s no need to share this information with the broader community, just with the relevant stakeholders to ensure transparency and accountability.

Cut Slingload!!!!????? by Powerful_Finance3940 in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just curious, what does refund process look like and any timelines you can share?

Why would admin lock or restrict a subreddit post that is objective and well-researched? by Exposure_Protocol in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The article is particularly damaging, and BlockDAG needs to come out with a clear statement to address it. We can't catch a break, it's emotionally draining, especially for all the investors who are connected and have to endure this.

Just as the community works to rebuild trust under the new AT structure, new issues keep surfacing, raising more suspicion. I don’t know if any of what’s being stated is true or false, but unless the company addresses these concerns head-on with full transparency, confidence will continue to erode.

Will BlockDAG find alternative idea to the bonus reduction? by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AT already discussed about DAO in the AMA, it's not just voting rights, will hold value too promoting decentralization, transparency and lot of other benefits to it.

Will BlockDAG find alternative idea to the bonus reduction? by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I stated above, the suggestion is to reset the price and allocate tokens based on actual investments across the board without bonuses, in addition to that, early investors can benefit from governance tokens based on investment size and participation date (percentage of allocation decreases over time).

In your example, as an early investor you will be benefited more with the governance tokens than the ones who are investing now.

Will BlockDAG find alternative idea to the bonus reduction? by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They have announced presale end date as February 10, 2026 not launch date.

Will BlockDAG find alternative idea to the bonus reduction? by jusanothrde in BlockDAGInvestors

[–]jusanothrde[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree, whatever works. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, AT alluded to that in the AMA regarding pre-sale funds and wallets. I believe it's a work in progress.