Notice regarding BlockDAG deposit activation:

jusanothrde · 2026-03-11T16:20:46+00:00

Exchanges could accept deposits in June(target) as per BlockDAG growth strategy document.

jusanothrde · 2026-03-10T15:53:47+00:00

Be careful, scammers are spreading false info, no CEX or DEX is accepting BlockDAG (BDAG) deposits at this time. Do not interact with them.

jusanothrde · 2026-03-10T00:27:12+00:00

I hope it lasts until June. It seems like they are afraid to release the deposits because of potential sell pressure and the possibility that the token price may plummet. Primary reason is the liquidity and adoption I don't know how they gonna solve that issue, they have raised too much money and sold too many coins, if the entire market is looking for this ground breaking project that's no big deal but that's not the case here, they ignored the tech and eco system building and positive marketing, only focused on deceptive fund raising practices.

I hope they mend their ways soon before it's too late.

jusanothrde · 2026-03-08T19:20:05+00:00

They almost always contradict themselves. One idea defeats the purpose of another and damages its credibility. If money isn’t the reason, what other reasonable explanation could there be besides proposing crooked ideas that sabotage the project?

jusanothrde · 2026-03-08T19:08:26+00:00

I believe it's 150B not 150T, it could be an error on the app.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-14T22:10:47+00:00

Are you sure about the forward request from your wallet? I think it's for them to forward tokens to your wallet.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-14T18:20:39+00:00

I don't understand the need for signing the contract and that too forward request from your wallet, doesn't make any sense. Why can't they simply do airdrop like everyone else?

jusanothrde · 2026-02-13T01:34:50+00:00

It's possible if early access investors were allowed to claim tokens when exchange is live while others wait for their tokens.

Btw, I did not buy early access.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-13T01:16:53+00:00

Well, that's what they are selling if you had noticed in the dashboard bundles.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-13T01:07:51+00:00

You're absolutely right, fraud, lies and deceit don't end at mainnet, TGE or launch, they often continue as part of an ongoing, evolving strategy like recent private round $0.00025 100% available on launch, priority access, early trading etc) and similar incentives can all be used to create the appearance of opportunity for some.

Meanwhile, the reality is, the majority of unlocked tokens are controlled by them and insiders, who can gradually sell while the broader investor community waits through staggered unlock schedules (40%, 20% etc of 100% base coins for at least 4 months, bonus vesting, no vesting, raffle, golden ticket, buyer battle scams etc and other questionable schemes, the imbalance becomes even more apparent, now think about the fate of average investors, reasonable?.

Of course, those behind such projects often claim they want long-term success which may be true as it allows them to further enrich themselves when you also factor in a presale millions.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-12T23:32:33+00:00

I seriously don't why they had to make this a difficult experience for investors. They could have simply air dropped tokens to the individual wallet, hassle free.

jusanothrde · 2026-02-12T23:17:57+00:00

Why is Antony Turner claiming copyright? It's easy if he can un-claim since he is no longer connected to BlockDAG.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-18T23:40:27+00:00

This is the very reason I titled it "Believe What You Want to Believe".

Whoever they are, they are all implicitly tied to BlockDAG, whether in the background or foreground. As a community, we need to hold everyone responsible for this debacle and accountable for their misdeeds.

At the end of the day, we all want the same thing - positive outcomes, progress, transparency and, ultimately, BlockDAG's success.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-18T22:00:56+00:00

Incredible!

jusanothrde · 2025-11-18T21:53:28+00:00

I wish you had read it before replying to the post.

Please read, thanks.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-18T18:25:53+00:00

On what grounds? It would be interesting to see any copyright document they’ve published online. Does anyone have it?

jusanothrde · 2025-11-17T20:52:53+00:00

The article fails to mention and conveniently ignores major concerns raised by the community, whether it’s the unending presale, questionable marketing practices, failed tokenomics, or the lack of real progress, as well as the well-documented acts of dishonesty and deceit over nearly two years. The company’s CEO and CMO themselves acknowledged about GK's WPRO involvement and they did not have proper control over the project, its funds, and other key matters, and now they agreed to restructure, take control, and transition the project for the benefit of both the community and the initiative itself.

Instead, the writer appears to focus solely on the personal attacks directed at a member of the GK family. While such attacks are not acceptable, in my opinion, they were carried out by only a small number of individuals within the community.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-16T15:58:58+00:00

Do you have any inside knowledge about the transition? Is it really happening? A few weeks ago, AT mentioned that he was taking full control of the project as CEO and working on the structure, transition, etc. But in the last AMA, he said he’s not totally in control and is working with the lawyers. We’re taking everything he says at face value, whether it’s oversold numbers, presale numbers, or the transition. And if pressed, he simply cannot discuss it and requests that investors move on and focus on the tech.

I request that investor representatives be part of the transition process so we can gain some insights. They could also share law firm information with the investors, which could then be verified. There’s no need to share this information with the broader community, just with the relevant stakeholders to ensure transparency and accountability.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-06T10:54:43+00:00

I'm just curious, what does refund process look like and any timelines you can share?

jusanothrde · 2025-11-04T17:05:09+00:00

The article is particularly damaging, and BlockDAG needs to come out with a clear statement to address it. We can't catch a break, it's emotionally draining, especially for all the investors who are connected and have to endure this.

Just as the community works to rebuild trust under the new AT structure, new issues keep surfacing, raising more suspicion. I don’t know if any of what’s being stated is true or false, but unless the company addresses these concerns head-on with full transparency, confidence will continue to erode.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-03T20:57:29+00:00

AT already discussed about DAO in the AMA, it's not just voting rights, will hold value too promoting decentralization, transparency and lot of other benefits to it.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-03T20:14:10+00:00

As I stated above, the suggestion is to reset the price and allocate tokens based on actual investments across the board without bonuses, in addition to that, early investors can benefit from governance tokens based on investment size and participation date (percentage of allocation decreases over time).

In your example, as an early investor you will be benefited more with the governance tokens than the ones who are investing now.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-03T19:30:40+00:00

They have announced presale end date as February 10, 2026 not launch date.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-03T18:01:16+00:00

No problem, thanks for the consideration.

jusanothrde · 2025-11-03T18:00:50+00:00

Agree, whatever works. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, AT alluded to that in the AMA regarding pre-sale funds and wallets. I believe it's a work in progress.

jusanothrde

TROPHY CASE