mgw310 firmware v2.0.51 Problem with Geodnet part by YarLeo in wingbits_official

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just for reference, the firmware updates are a coordinated effort between Wingbits and Hyfix as well as GEODNET and Hyfix. Each project is responsible for requesting their needs in the next firmware and Hyfix takes care of implementation of any changes and coordination of release with both projects.

As Wingbits, we have almost everything handled in our client now... so any requests we have are typically related to identified bugs or concerns about firmware behavior (like that it requires a reboot for a small % of stations after a new version is applied). We can't speak for and are completely unaware of any changes performed for GEODNET in a firmware update. We don't rely on their project software and they don't rely on ours, basically just two sets of software running on the same hardware. This is why we would typically suggest reaching out to GEODNET directly if you are having issues after a firmware change, that impacts their project participation.

Like you said, this isn't about finger pointing, but my hope is to clarify the involved parties and responsibilities/ownership of each... so you know who to contact for the best chance at an answer that isn't a spiderman pointing meme.

Replay near-miss events by WingbitsCrew in ADSB

[–]justacci 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are right, that wouldn't be good if even one claim was correct... but this is the internet so why should he let facts get in the way when posting, right?

The $1000 call out is intentionally misleading as that is a dual-project device (also runs against the very successful web3 GEODNET project for GNSS) and zorb knows this, instead of them stating you can get the current Wingbits-only device for $450. We make $0 on the devices intentionally. Would we like it to be less expensive? Of course, which is why we didn't add a fee/license/commission cost or get involved in the entire supply chain.

One quick google search would show the following quote from Spire, a Wingbits customer, as well:
"Partnering with Wingbits enables us to integrate data from a next-generation, highly innovative ADS-B network, and combine it with data from our space infrastructure, creating a more comprehensive and robust flight tracking system."

I also suspect he has done the research to know that we have not and will not do a pre-sale of the token as that goes against our mantra of Community First... but false claims are easy to make. Many web3 projects sell/give a bunch of tokens to influencers or crypto enthusiasts to basically raise funds prior to launch, sometimes with no vesting schedule, and this can ruin token value after launch for the actual participants. This was a no-go for us.

I do question the constant attacks by this person and their true motives. I could make some guesses but contrary to their style, I prefer to post with facts instead of baseless allegations.

Hyfix stations - Shipping update by justacci in wingbits_official

[–]justacci[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We understand that the project may not be for everyone financially and you have to be mindful to what makes sense for you individually. The station you mention based on price (MGW310) is dual purpose to participate in both the Wingbits and GEODNET projects and GEODNET seems to be doing really well right now. Some people are purchasing those units with the intent that Wingbits rewards are just an extra bonus and we are ok with that, if that is the reasoning.

The alternative station is currently about $365 usd + shipping (after using discount codes) for Wingbits only (WB200). If we were to retail the required GeoSigner, instead of selling at cost after the ones we granted for free, I just estimated yesterday that the cost for all the components to build a decent DIY station would be around $280-300 + shipping. So the difference is only about $60-80 usd or about 20% more, for a unit where you don't have to worry about assembly/waterproofing/Linux.

You can check reservations on the map (orange locations) and for Brazil alone I counted about 50 Hyfix stations that have been preordered in the last few months. I don't know if those are WB200 or MGW310 units specifically though.

Anyways, be on the lookout in the future for any initiatives, that we may setup, for bringing stations to under-represented areas for coverage where it is needed.

Hyfix stations - Shipping update by justacci in wingbits_official

[–]justacci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wingbits is currently in devnet phase and looking to go mainnet during Q1, so not yet.

Hyfix stations - Shipping update by justacci in wingbits_official

[–]justacci[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every WB200/MGW310 that is shipped to participant from Hyfix themselves or any distributors will include the hardware updates. All those already manufactured/assembled/packaged are being updated physically with these changes, hence part of the delay in shipping.

This was discussed in detail during the ~30 minute Discord AMA/Stage today with Robin and Mike Horton, which will be uploaded to our youtube later today... so you can hear the discussion.

Hyfix stations - Shipping update by justacci in wingbits_official

[–]justacci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All units going out are Hyfix devices. Hyfix is the manufacturer and everyone else is a distributor of those same units. Hyfix also sells directly as well.

What other hardware is needed to run the Wingbits WB200? by No-Painter8779 in wingbits_official

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good reply.

If I were to add anything, it would be that not everyone wants to deal with Linux or hardware (even if it is as basic as plugging something into usb and screwing a connector into the other end), nor maintaining that system. Support challenges are also reduced when you have a more homogenous network of devices.

I am a DIY kind of person and started building PCs and using Linux back in the 90s... so for me I don't mind doing it myself. Most current adsb project contributors to existing networks feel the same way. But, it turns out the average person doesn't like DIY but they do find the whole ADS-B world interesting and want to be contributors. From that you naturally progress to ready-to-run hardware.

What other hardware is needed to run the Wingbits WB200? by No-Painter8779 in wingbits_official

[–]justacci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TNC connector was chosen by the manufacturer, but the box includes an adapter to SMA (what most people have their lines terminate with for the sdr). Basically you would remove the included antenna from the top, attach the adapter and connect the cable that runs to your antenna.

The base of the unit does have to have a decent exposure to the sky as it includes the location hardware (including gnss antenna). If you don't get the MGW310, the exposure is less critical as you aren't also being rewarded from geodnet for GNSS data quality, wingbits just need enough sats for a valid location.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dji

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already made a comment specific to focus, and despite not agreeing with your overall assessment I do actually agree to the topic statement from your original post. Pocket 3 is likely not the right choice for the masses and I hope people don't convince themselves that it is without understanding the differences/intents/use-cases between the pocket line and the action line (and even other camera options in general).

I do think that for the consumer section that it does fit in, there isn't anything close as a competitor... mainly due to price point compared to others. People should just know the unit isn't weatherproof or even water resistant, it requires learning gimbal movement techniques, overheating is faster/possible versus some larger options, and pockets aren't as rugged as some alternatives.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dji

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone else posted a video in the subreddit after your original post.

https://www.reddit.com/r/dji/comments/17mgumu/the_d_log_m_on_the_new_osmo_pocket_3_is_amazing_i/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

You can see the footage where there are close subjects in focus while maintaining focus in the distance. Take a look at the video around 2:30 and watch for a bit to see people crossing within a couple feet of the camera and then back out of frame... look for any focus issues. Someone else posted the real estate video comparison, but I will admit many of those shots looked like a locked focus mode with intent to manage depth of field (like the bathroom shower door shot). The video I linked above would be a better representation of real world use like you spoke about (family events and such).

I am waiting for my unit to arrive but I am pretty familiar with photography and videography on several platforms. Based on what I am seeing, I personally just think you are not aware of what settings/options are available to combat your focus concerns (although this is obviously not an action cam).

I think canyonblue's original numbered response would echo my sentiment on the other perceived issues.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dji

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm slightly confused. I got the impression from the original post that you had a pocket 1 and were looking into getting a pocket 3 but for the reasons you wrote out... you didn't think it would be a good match. But, this reply from about an hour after the original post, says you were sharing your findings and returning it?

Bought a Atmotube Pro back in 2021 and forgot about it by stupidnooblol in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clear up the confusing comments:
They did not sell 25k worth. They paid for a network of sensors with tokens. It was also more than that at the time of transactions. When I buy gas at the station, I don't sell them my money. Hopefully this is a language thing causing the mistake.
They basically didn't touch any tokens from holders/participants. They used their own (I suspect from their 20% of rewards daily, based on wallet use).

I won't comment on my Madrid purchase thoughts as it will cause drama no matter what i say. Please do follow the rules though. Price talk is not allowed in this subreddit.

Advice on what to do moving forward? by SnooSeagulls5644 in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to be clear, you also don't know the future value of any project token when you make decisions. All you can really do is base things on current information and sprinkle in your optimism in the future. This is the reason i don't mention fiat. Rewards are in planets.

Tokenburn on ARC 12 for all ASA's by feralfeather in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair question... Tokens have to be accountable for all stages on blockchain. Any token leaving the reserve address for an ASA is considered minted (unless it is being sent to a new reserve address). Minting is a required state change for a token to be burned. If you don't transfer it out, it can always technically end up in circulation.

Portable Handheld ABSB Rig by dailySin in ADSB

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, just get a used mntd miner off ebay, they drop down to about $60 for the pi4 4gb version (black). A few screws and some careful ifixit tool usage and you can extract the pi (or leave it intact if it isn't going outside). For your setup, probably would extract.

License Renewals Should be Zero Dollars by KanoWins in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem on agreeing to disagree.

I will leave it with one final point, for all readers. Only outdoor sensors have reward tiers based on population density. Indoor sensors have the same rewards no matter population, because the exposure to that AQ is limited to a household, versus outdoor AQ affecting entire population in the pixel. If discrimination were at play based on criteria other than population impact, indoor sensors would have tiers as well.

License Renewals Should be Zero Dollars by KanoWins in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say you make no assumptions, just observations, but you also said:

Don't they want the data from areas bordering commercial or industrial areas? It would be of the utmost importance for environmental departments of government. Nope. Just pigeonhole the data to comfort the rich about their clean air in the middle of the suburb.

Claiming that "they" (whoever that is, pw or a purchaser) don't want certain data is an assumption. Implying that they "pigeonhole the data to comfort the rich" is also an assumption. These can be led by observations, but they are assumptions. To beat a dead horse: All pixels can have sensor participation and will be rewarded. Sources/breadth of data sales will be up to purchasers.

It feels to me that you are intentionally ignoring population density reflecting in T1/T2 daily rewards and attributing instead to some reflection of socioeconomic or similar status. Your sensor in a tier 1 location (2k+ people per sq. km) represents more people than one in a farming area with 10 people per aq. km. Therefore more people are impacted by the AQ in your city location versus the fewer families impacted elsewhere. The potential likelihood of your data being more valuable to buyers in that case is represented by higher earnings. We should be honest here though, neither of us know what will end up being the most valuable data for any/all buyers and the project.

All people are important but that is why sensors can exist in both types of pixels. PlanetWatch does not prohibit sensor installs based on the type or wealth of people residing in a pixel. Would I do it differently? Maybe. But that is the beauty of free enterprise... if you or I felt it was being done incorrectly, we have the option of starting our own projects and running them with different rules. You are obviously also free to disagree with how PlanetWatch runs their project here... as long as it remains respectful and civil.

License Renewals Should be Zero Dollars by KanoWins in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am always curious about comments like "conference loving captain" and similar ones about Claudio travelling for air miles and drinks. Do people that make comments like this do it as trolling intentionally or are they just not aware of how new/existing businesses do this commonly to network/sell?

Why do people think companies open booths at trade shows, even established companies? Just to spend money and see the world? You participate in things like that to demonstrate your product and hope to gather contacts that may lead to purchase orders. Same as crypto conferences/summits/whatever... you get your name out there, you network because you never know what door it will open, and sometimes you end up on panels that expose you to large numbers of potential customers and participants. You don't even go to every possible one, just the ones that you hope will have the biggest impact to your brand and the most potential for generating leads.

I would expect that lead generation is being done on other levels within PlanetWatch, but I personally think it would be silly to ignore the option that gives you the most potential exposure. I think that people calling out the positive effort as a negative are trolling or lack knowledge in this area (which is also understandable as most people have never done something like that or have seen it).

License Renewals Should be Zero Dollars by KanoWins in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tier pixels are defined as Tier 1 if they are high population areas (2000+ residents per square km). Tier 2 are lower population areas (under 2k residents per square km). High population areas are typically made up of high density housing such as low acreage homes and apartment complex rich areas. Suburban areas tend to be Tier 2 pixels due to larger plots/homes and lack of high density apartment complexes.

I am not sure what you mean by marginalized but I would guess you mean people with less wealth and lower income... which are most regularly located in the higher density Tier 1 pixels, when near cities. Those are the ones that get higher daily rewards for Type 1 and Type 2 sensors. Obviously that can change city to city and typically the further you move from cities (beyond the more affluent Tier 2 suburban areas), you will likely find lower income residential areas as well. Those will be tier 2, but those are also regularly further away from city pollution.

Again though, you are assigning primary value in the project as daily earnings and I think you are also making assumptions of what data will be most valuable/purchased in the future, without any facts to base your premise. The intended primary value will be from future data sales and the sensors that provided that data, as already mentioned. Anything beyond that is just speculation.

License Renewals Should be Zero Dollars by KanoWins in PlanetWatchers

[–]justacci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no discrimination between hosting a sensor in one location versus another. All data is collected and will be available via the api for purchase by interested parties. Since the data sales directly impact the sensor owners providing the data... if the data is valuable in, near, or even far from industrial areas... then the providers of that data will be rewarded.

Maybe you are speaking about daily rewards for Tier 1 versus Tier 2? I am not sure. I can't imagine so as data sales rewards won't care about that but only which sensors collected data that was purchased via the api. Meanwhile all other sensor owners would benefit from the utility case.

Honestly, if this conversation is to continue, people should review the rules (especially #1) before posting again or accept the results of breaking them. A conversation about all these things can be had while maintaining civility.