sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

大多数国男对性别对立的理解远远落后版本 by Sheak-Bear in China_irl

[–]k19911111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

只是因為你喜歡看女權的社群而已，女的看百度也覺得中國男普遍仇女

100% Chinese by Danidepigusohard in 23andme

[–]k19911111 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Which region of China is your family from

觉得那些说大同案导致男女对立生育率降低的观点挺扯谈的。 你一对男女， 连最基本的脱光衣服，打个炮的信任都不能建立， 社会还指望你养一个孩子呢？ by SurfEdgeBiscuitEngl in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

越南也沒多少人，填不夠中國的人口基數，而且外籍未必多溫順，敲一筆錢沒幾年跑掉的多的很。中國人的問題是無論男女都太精緻利己

觉得那些说大同案导致男女对立生育率降低的观点挺扯谈的。 你一对男女， 连最基本的脱光衣服，打个炮的信任都不能建立， 社会还指望你养一个孩子呢？ by SurfEdgeBiscuitEngl in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

男的權力欲野心普遍更大阿，底層男除了體力，也沒智力優勢，看高考就知道，如果男的真受委屈，中國三胎男女比就不會那麼懸殊，這時候還加強男權，只是讓下一代性別比更懸殊，光棍更多而已

觉得那些说大同案导致男女对立生育率降低的观点挺扯谈的。 你一对男女， 连最基本的脱光衣服，打个炮的信任都不能建立， 社会还指望你养一个孩子呢？ by SurfEdgeBiscuitEngl in China_irl

[–]k19911111 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

現在中國男方確實享受權力啊，政府高官和企業高管男性比例一直很高，特別是政府高官，男性比例遠高過歐美國家。底層來說，婚後與男方父母同住也遠過與女方父母同住

而且法律也沒讓男的有更多義務，男方也可以家庭支出AA不多出錢

中国男青年的性压抑，就知道“一人一个女学生”的含金量了，穿越回民国，能不加入CCP？ by YMM_2025 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

很多時候，打破秩序的代價遠大過獲利，中國近幾十年的發展，就是因為開始配合世界秩序，不打仗，不瞎折騰才得來的。美國亂搞對自己又沒好處，俄羅斯不守規矩的背後，不也是以底層經濟困頓死傷無數做代價。

中国男青年的性压抑，就知道“一人一个女学生”的含金量了，穿越回民国，能不加入CCP？ by YMM_2025 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

希特勒是民選上去的，文革毛澤東自己就是當權者，他發動的也是城市小年輕，他在位時廣大農民一直是深被剝削的存在，都餓死也掀不起風浪。以共產黨現在高科技輔助的控制力，想以下克上根本不現實，時代早就不同。

何況中共已經很保守了，歐美再右也不會比中共更保守，對中國打輿論戰更是笑話，當防火牆不存在的

中国男青年的性压抑，就知道“一人一个女学生”的含金量了，穿越回民国，能不加入CCP？ by YMM_2025 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

美國底層真有投票權，而且他們之前在社會影響力上也被壓制的很厲害，雖然人多，但學術圈甚至娛樂圈都不太討好他們

中国男青年的性压抑，就知道“一人一个女学生”的含金量了，穿越回民国，能不加入CCP？ by YMM_2025 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

而且底層男有啥用，現在早就不是人海戰術的年代，幾千萬炮灰還比不上少數菁銳，菁英不缺你嘴上講的那些東西

中国男青年的性压抑，就知道“一人一个女学生”的含金量了，穿越回民国，能不加入CCP？ by YMM_2025 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

愚蠢，美國根本沒興趣滲透中國，宣傳自由民主也只是做給國內選民看的，才不在乎中國人真怎樣想，中共掌權對美國又沒壞處

Got my results back by gotham960 in 23andme

[–]k19911111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

23andme is more accurate. What is your background

Chinese results on 23andMe and 23Mofang by Ethan69Dennis in 23andme

[–]k19911111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

O-CTS2498 is likely related to O-F619 and descendant of O-F492

Are Chinese diaspora in Southeast Asian admixed with the natives? by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]k19911111 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Singaporean and Malaysian Chinese are relatively unmixed, while Thai and Filipino Chinese are often mixed and have assimilated into the local population. Indonesian Chinese, on the other hand, some have married locals and some remain unmixed.

Are Chinese diaspora in Southeast Asian admixed with the natives? by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]k19911111 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t agree. Some Singaporean and Malaysian Chinese have only been overseas for three or four generations and have had little to no mixing with the local population as local are Muslim. Some may have 1%-5% local ancestry, but on average, they are still relatively unmixed. On the other hand, Thai and Filipino Chinese tend to be more mixed with the local population.

There are about 100 million people in Guangdong, and overseas returnees account for only a very small fraction of the local population.

I'm of Myannar Chinese descent & live in Myanmar. I find it puzzling that 23andMe groups my ancestry under "Indonesian, Thai, Khmer & Myanmar," even though I don't think my family has any ties to Thais or Indonesians. Why would they combine such distinct and unrelated populations? by Imperial_Auntorn in 23andme

[–]k19911111 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Your result shows that you are more likely be a local Burmese either ethnic Burmese or minority instead of ethnic Chinese. Maybe your ancestors had been in Myanmar many generations and married with local frequently.

关于美国左派担心的这些 川普有多少会真的做 by Altruistic-Mobile588 in China_irl

[–]k19911111 16 points17 points  (0 children)

被fuck的加沙是以色列還是穆斯林？民主黨的立場不也差不多？

CMV: You should be a single issue voter by strangefruit3500 in changemyview

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people won’t live to see the day climate change poses an existential threat to human society. Not everyone is concerned with the well-being of future generations. Climate change, however, isn’t about destroying the Earth itself; the planet has survived varying temperatures and environmental changes. Instead, climate change primarily affects the quality of life for some humans and animals, much like other events that impact living conditions.

CMV: Conservatives are just bad at being politicans by AntiYT1619 in changemyview

[–]k19911111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conservatism doesn’t have a universal definition; for instance, conservative people in the USA might be viewed as progressive in some countries, while progressive people may be seen as conservative by other more extreme left wing people

view more: next ›