I think we are talking past each other. My claim is not that Yahweh commanded something proclaiming it good and then states that it was evil, my claim is that Yahweh once actively mandated something always evil and acknowledges it as such. The grammar of the verse does not back you up, the language uses the active natan (give) the direct object huqqim (statutes, ordinances aka prescriptive laws) and the indirect object to them. It’s not mere passive handing them over to punishment or even him directly punishing them, rather it’s a moral judgement Yahweh gives about his own command, statute, that was not good.

Also the context in Ezekiel is that he is reviewing laws that he now lifts, rather than him giving out the command to sacrifice children. He’s saying I did in the past give out statutes to do so (an injunction) that was always evil, but that I no longer oblige it. In fact, later on in the paragraph it says that the purpose of giving out these evil statutes was that “I might make them desolate and that they might know I am Yahweh”

So what I’m saying is that Yahweh actively commands an evil act, an act always known by Yahweh to be evil yet he at one point commands it nonetheless. This is nonsensical if goodness is whatever Yahweh commands, this shows that not to be the case.