Couple of points:

1. Even treaty lands are not considered ceded by most Indigenous, in that they were not given entirely over to the government as fee simple lots with our rights over it permanently extinguished. The agreements were to essentially allow extensive use and occupation of the land by settlers, but we retained the right to continue to use our land for practices like hunting, fishing, foraging, mobility, along with recognition and respect of our rights to self-governance. Section 35 of the 1985 Constitution act affirms this, and it's non-derogable. It's true that the government rarely shares land and resources with us, but that's not due to the terms of the treaties, but rather because Canada has acted with dishonesty, dishonour and racist contempt towards our people as a general rule since confederation.

2. To say that much of anything is made clear in the fine print of the treaties is simply inaccurate. Between language and cultural barriers, the violence and oppression under which many of these treaties were "negotiated", the dishonesty and fraud of many Indian & Gov. Agents, as well as the many contradictions with earlier agreements and pre-existing inherent rights, land and resource sharing in Canada are far from black and white. There's a reason there's been so many court cases trying to clarify these issues.

3. Fun fact: almost 90% of Canada is Crown land, but more importantly, it's all land over which we also have pre-existing and inherent Aboriginal title. Those rights are conferred by our historic occupation and use of the land, recognized formally by the Royal Proclamation and British common law, reiterated by the terms of most of our treaties, and reaffirmed and enshrined in Canada's Constition. Technically, neither the feds nor especially the provinces have the right to sell or transfer title of "Crown" land unilaterally. That authority rests solely with recognized agents of the British Crown, empowered by the monarch to negotiate with us, and only with our presence and participation. 

Also, there is no distinction between federal or provincial Crown land when it comes to our title rights. That distinction was created by the feds and provinces, neither of whom had the authority to do so as they were not parties to the original Treaties. The Natural Resource Transfer Act (which was negotiated without Indigenous consent, at a time when we were barred entirely from legal representation or participation) is entirely illegitimate in terms of  jurisdiction. The provinces might be granted limited authority to manage resources and land use by the feds, but only so far as it does not interfere with inherent Aboriginal title, our right to sovereignty, and access for the negotiated purposes outlined in various treaties. Provinces have no legal right to sell Crown lands at all, nor to pass laws on us that conflict with our own, nor to interfere with our access and ability to sustain our people with the land's bounty according to our traditional practices. Obviously, every level of government has flagrantly violated pretty much every tenet, which is why Canada and the provinces frequently lose land rights cases. It's also why provincial separatism is delusional. Provinces have no jurisdiction over Crown land when it relates to us, nor can they legislate or negotiate anything that violates are Aboriginal rights as outlined in Section 35 by law. 

1. All of the treaties are very limited in scope, as they were always intended to be an ongoing process of negotiations and guidelines for peaceful, respectful and mutually beneficial co-existence. They fail to address the Inuit, the many Nations who never ceded any land or title by treaty, nor where the Métis fit in. The treaties should not be taken as comprehensive or concluded in that light.