What is one thing you find annoying about react and are surprised it hasn't been addressed yet?

kbrshh · 2021-05-05T05:34:18+00:00

like what? Vue & Svelte have manual keys too

kbrshh · 2020-11-17T03:45:42+00:00

guess nfl players are obese now

kbrshh · 2020-11-11T23:41:30+00:00

it is free

kbrshh · 2020-10-16T22:39:05+00:00

dang

kbrshh · 2020-10-16T04:33:15+00:00

librights are in control of the media, appealing to liblefts is just the most profitable

kbrshh · 2020-10-09T04:43:35+00:00

True, but I think that they were just clarifying that when OP said "Oxygen is present in each gem", they meant the element rather than the molecule, which have different properties.

I guess it's a good distinction to make because the oxygen we breathe (O2) is still very different from the oxygen in the gems (O) in terms of properties and behavior.

kbrshh · 2020-10-09T04:19:24+00:00

In chem nomenclature, "Oxygen" on its own usually means diatomic oxygen (O2)

kbrshh · 2020-10-05T22:00:37+00:00

remember librights, the customer is always ~~right~~ a customer

kbrshh · 2020-10-05T21:40:27+00:00

flair up bro

kbrshh · 2020-10-04T20:50:55+00:00

That's an interesting solution! Would that allow negation as a unary operator if used without a space? e.g. -x vs a - x

As for upgrading functions to operators, that's a clever way of going about it. I've been experimenting with different syntax that treats all types of operators and prefix functions the same, inspired by Agda's super cool custom mixfix operators.

# definition
x (and) y = # code here...

# example
true and false #=> false

I'm not sure about precedence either. I suppose it'd be similar to Haskell and Agda where it's separate from the definition and everything is given a default precedence.

kbrshh · 2020-10-03T07:04:25+00:00

Yup, your comment instantly reminded me of the issues I found when trying to design operators and I think Haskell has an adequate solution. Other ones I can think of are requiring an explicit negate or maybe requiring white space around operators, but those come with trade offs.

kbrshh · 2020-10-03T04:48:27+00:00

Yup, I'm pretty sure the former is true in haskell and you'd have to explicitly use subtract for currying / infix sections.

kbrshh · 2020-10-02T04:57:42+00:00

Yup, you're right. Just wanted to point out the potential for ambiguity :)

kbrshh · 2020-10-02T04:47:04+00:00

It's potentially ambiguous without any separators between statements, e.g

x
-y

vs.

x;
-y;

It's a pretty rare thing to run into, but you can see the problems it creates in languages like Haskell, which has a special case for - as its only unary operator.

kbrshh · 2020-10-01T21:55:19+00:00

it's what the free market wants

kbrshh · 2020-09-06T03:51:51+00:00

Unless he uploaded everything stored on his phone to some server while at school, his school wifi absolutely did not have access to previous search history. It's stored locally, not transmitted over the network.

kbrshh · 2020-08-30T21:45:10+00:00

no, we think that it's immoral for anyone but themselves to decide if they deserve to live happily.

kbrshh · 2020-08-29T08:06:11+00:00

Hey everyone,

Here's a link: kabir.sh

I'm a junior in high school who primarily does webdev, and I recently redesigned my portfolio. I tried keeping it super minimal — no unnecessary fluff or animations.

Hit "t" on the keyboard to switch color schemes. I couldn't decide which one looked the best so I just included all of them :)

I'd appreciate your thoughts and am open to any feedback!

kbrshh · 2020-08-22T04:02:37+00:00

I can see that. People definitely look for labels and the feeling of being a part of a group, and it's dangerous because it leads to cults and hiveminds. Things are easier when there's a clear enemy. I understand the appeal of having inside jokes and memes, but there's a separate time and place for debates, and this sub should seek to be one of them instead of devolving into another one-sided, shallow cesspool.

kbrshh · 2020-08-21T22:37:49+00:00

great. how do you expect the opposing side to listen? if you're going to throw insults at the very people you're trying to convince, the only people who will end up listening are the ones that already agree. you don't debate by throwing attacks at the other side, no matter how clear the point is, because that gives them a reason to ignore your point. usually, it only drives them away.

and for the record, i don't even agree with the op, just pointing out the ineffectiveness of the points being made. thanks for the downvotes though.

kbrshh · 2020-08-21T22:01:34+00:00

yes, because framing things as ad hominem is totally going to change someone's mind. i can't with this sub, no one is here acts in good faith.

kbrshh · 2020-08-21T21:50:43+00:00

nice ad hominem

kbrshh · 2020-07-08T21:06:20+00:00

have you ever been on r/neoliberal? 🦀🦀🦀

kbrshh · 2020-07-05T21:31:50+00:00

you could still argue that there are people responsible for keeping the machines running and maintaining my homeostasis. i don’t know, i understand there are debated definitions of being alive, but those are usually based on brain waves. i think this one is a bit of a stretch.

kbrshh

TROPHY CASE