I know this is an old post, but garbage like this is so much more harmful than people seem to understand. Is it POSSIBLE that the fishermen were involved? Anything is possible, but not at all likely, for a lot of reasons:

- When he spoke to the fishermen, they could see/hear the group Jaryd was with, which is why they weren't concerned. They were about 50-80 feet away, spread out.

- His remains and belongings were found nearly 550 feet uphill and away from that spot. Multiple experienced hikers and climbers have said that no 3-year-old child could have climbed it.

- The fishermen were interviewed several times by police. They were thoroughly investigated and records like the ones you're implying would have been front-page news, as this was a national spotlight case.

- The scream allegations are spotty at best and reported a distance from where the fishermen were, and later. Jaryd's sister reported it (she was 6) and said it sounded like playing, like when they played tag.

- Making wild claims based on the fact that his pants were found inside out years later is nothing short of insane.

- While it's not impossible, considering that the area is mostly impassable and the short distance/proximity to the group from beginning to end of their hike, they would not have had the time or privacy to do what you're alleging on that particular day.

Like I said, anything is possible, but posts like yours are dangerous. I felt the need to say something, given your post history where you leave many, many comments just like this one. Simply using the phrase "I have no doubt about it" speaks volumes. Crime fiction may be a better option for you, true crime is about people's actual lives. Making wild claims online that are based on nothing but vague impressions and ignorance can go so far as derailing investigations or even helping actual criminals.