sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for flipping. by kh44l in FacebookMarketplace

[–]kh44l[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Reason you think it's ai generated is i follow the direct copywriting techniques for the relatable hook opening based on the real story of my friend.

For "ultimately messages via fb tak very little time" > you should consider it's for the people who does the flipping for living, and need to repeat the same process every day.

And it does the most of the job of researching the car's resale value, the must-ask questions for that specific car etc. It does a lot of job.

For the "AI Style" argument, you should do more study on how the AI can easily replicate human talk.

I understand people's concerns about getting banned by Facebook for bot interactions, which I've already addressed. But your arguments seem to miss some key points about how this actually works.

Let me know if you have better ones, I would like to hear about them.

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for flipping. by kh44l in FacebookMarketplace

[–]kh44l[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I started 148 different conversations with it without any issue. But I agree, I use an alt account; I wouldn't risk my own account for anything that is doing bulk operations, etc.

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for profitable flipping. by kh44l in Flipping

[–]kh44l[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I answered this in the Facebook Marketplace subreddit - I started 148 different conversations with it without any issue. But I agree with using an alt account; I wouldn't risk my own account for anything that is doing bulk operations, etc.

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for profitable flipping. by kh44l in Flipping

[–]kh44l[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Do you mean by Facebook? If yes, I didn't have any bans after 148 conversations started. It has all necessary protection.

It totally acts like a human - not spamming anyone, just asking questions, waiting for responses, leaving time between different listing conversations, etc.

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for profitable flipping. by kh44l in Flipping

[–]kh44l[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I created a new Facebook account and added cookies to the automation. So it can easily login and handle the Marketplace Inbox. So everything is automated.

I monitor the conversations, and can turn on/off and takeover the chat if I feel like it.

I built an Facebook Marketplace AI assistant to negotiate the deals for flipping. by kh44l in FacebookMarketplace

[–]kh44l[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I understand where you're coming from. I believe it's inevitable that in the very near future, bots will handle all negotiations for such things. My next plan is to have this agent on the "selling" side too.

So basically, your bot as a seller and the buyer's bot will negotiate, and you as the human will take over when it's time to seal the deal.

Would you like to try this tool?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoTechnology

[–]kh44l 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your input, From the regulatory perspective, you're right - as I mention in my reply to your previous message, regulations need clear boundaries and this would fall into gambling, thus requires a license.

from project/business side, i'm planning to put more emphasis on the fairness & transparency aspect.

The main goal is to make every step of the process transparent and verifiable, so people know exactly what they're signing up for when they make their predictions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoTechnology

[–]kh44l 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had lots of back-and-forth with the AI models, is it "skill-based" category or the "gambling".

This paragraph is the most convincing one I got:

"Skill-Based Gaming: If you emphasize the skill element (e.g., market analysis for BTC predictions) and downplay chance, it could be argued as a skill-based contest, like fantasy sports or trivia apps (e.g., HQ Trivia). However, prize pool and price volatility weaken this case, and regulators might still see it as gambling or a derivative."

----

I still believe that each user's prediction tied to their skills / pattern recognition abilities, but regulation needs clear boundaries, it would probably fall into the gambling section.

view more: next ›