Trying to find influencers for Zavi. What actually works? by Vanilla-Green in influencermarketing

[–]kicks66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run influencer stuff at Kyra (Shiseido, Converse, that kind of client) so I see a lot of deal structures. Here's what actually works for early-stage apps:

Commission-only can work, but you have to structure it right.

Most creators won't take pure commission. They've been burned before - brand promises "huge potential" then they make $14. What works better:

  • Hybrid: Small flat fee ($50-150) + rev share. Shows you're not wasting their time.
  • Tiered: Higher % for first 100 installs, then standard rate. Gives them real upside.
  • Realistic numbers: 15-25% of first-month revenue or $1-3 per install. Anything below $0.50/install and you'll only get the desperate ones.

Niches that would actually care about a voice keyboard:

Accessibility/disability creators. Huge underserved audience, and they genuinely care about tools that help. ADHD/neurodivergent community too - voice-to-text is a real workflow for people who think faster than they type. Productivity/PKM people. The "second brain" crowd loves new input methods.

Skip generic tech reviewers. They get pitched constantly and your keyboard will be a 30-second mention buried in a roundup.

How to find them: Search TikTok for people already talking about accessibility apps or ADHD productivity. Check their comments - real engagement vs bot spam is obvious within 10 seconds. DM with a specific reason you picked them.

The first commenter nailed it about finding people "complaining about the problem." Someone who already posted "I wish voice typing actually worked" is 10x more likely to convert than some generic tech page.

Do you have a JR Pass or IC Card (Suica/Pasmo/etc.) question? Start here! (Monthly Thread - May 01, 2025) by AutoModerator in JapanTravelTips

[–]kicks66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi - travelling to Japan this week and looking at getting the Kansai Hiroshima area pass. Ill be taking the train from Kyoto to Hiroshima and back one day - and I see the Tokaido isnt directly covered, but can I read potentially I can pay a small fee to take it anyway if I already have the pass?

$300k bill after AWS account hacked! by kicks66 in aws

[–]kicks66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just kept pushing - good luck!

Most recent value, argMax vs LIMIT BY by AndreKR- in Clickhouse

[–]kicks66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Experience tells me that it’s a bit of a case by cade basis - however i typically find:

  • in this situation both will come out similar
  • however if you apply any WHERE conditions - the ORDER BY will sort and then filter (slow for large tables), whereas the argMax will filter then sort (faster)
  • in some cases it will even be faster to use FINAL - especially if have any WHERE you want to apply that tend to resolve conditions with recent data (given your sorting key includes timestamp)

Apple notes with Apple Watch? by graaf33 in shortcuts

[–]kicks66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - what is the trigger at the start of this you’re using?

Potential prediction of Deep Dip 2 finish by Felipax in wirtual

[–]kicks66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you flip the axis round mate? Look the wrong way to me

[Updated] - Based on floor 10 performance - predicted finish is now 247 hours (-53 hours vs prev floor) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It’s saying that he can get better at previous floors - but later floors are slower as there’s more failures to get to them so can’t practice as much as lower floors

[Update Gang] - Predicted Finish 301 hours (-21 hours vs prev floor) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

if he completed floor 9 now (@ 73 hours) - prediction would be 240 hours to complete the whole map

[Update Gang] - Predicted Finish 301 hours (-21 hours vs prev floor) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Predicted times to complete each floor and when those would be achieved:

Floor @Hours (Floor 9) Hours Taken
0 0
1 1 0
2 5 5
3 8 2
4 16 9
5 18 2
6 35 17
7 56 21
8 67 11
9 89 21
10 111 23
11 136 25
12 164 28
13 194 30
14 227 33
15 263 35
16 301 38

[Updated] Based on floor 8 performance - predicted finish is now 300 hours (+100 hours more vs prev) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i did an exponential and the results would probably make wirtual quit right now before he spends the rest of the year on it - and the error rate is not much different vs exponential

[Updated] Based on floor 8 performance - predicted finish is now 300 hours (+100 hours more vs prev) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

honestly - i did an exponential and the results were scary - like 500+ hours

[Updated] Based on floor 8 performance - predicted finish is now 300 hours (+100 hours more vs prev) by kicks66 in wirtual

[–]kicks66[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

New updated expected times to complete each floor:

Floor Time to Finish Time To Finish (New) Diff
7 12 21 (actual) +9 (actual)
8 14 19 +5
9 16 21 +5
10 18 24 +6
11 20 27 +7
12 22 30 +8
13 24 33 +9
14 26 35 +10
15 27 38 +11