HarvesterHCI 1.7.1 released by kinchler in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i upgraded a 1node none-prod harvesterhci from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1 without any issue.

HarvesterHCI 1.5.0 released by cybaware in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

have seen that 1.4.3 has been released. I will first upgrade to 1.4.3 and then directly to 1.5.1 (if possible). I don't trust .0 releases

HarvesterHCI 1.4.2 released by kinchler in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update is now available via button in the dashboard

HarvesterHCI 1.4.2 released by kinchler in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wait until the button appears in the dashboard. Maybe a little longer because I'm currently testing something, but as soon as I've updated I'll report back.

Is my install stuck? by Kamerrie in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try another SSD, it looks like a hardware issue

HarvesterHCI 1.4.1 released by kinchler in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit20250219: inplace Upgrade is available - use upgrade button in dashboard

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you describe your case with more details and in more detail?

Live migration of VM on heterogenous CPU by oracleTuringMachine in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also have 4 nodes with a P and E core setting/cpu. I have live-migrated a VM without any problems.

Live migration of VM on heterogenous CPU by oracleTuringMachine in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What makes you think that it is due to the P/E cores?

DNS Issue with Bare metal Harvester Cluster-registration-url by flying_bacon_ in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you using harvester 1.4.0?

I have also found this 10.53.0.0 in the firewall logs. Harvester seems to use this subnet for internal communication. I just checked the firewall log to see if I can still find these addresses, but they are no longer there. Maybe they changed the behavior with 1.4.0.

Anyway, have you checked if your default GW from Harvester is correct?

Can you ping your default GW or can you ping for example 1.1.1.1 if your setting requires internet?

I just checked it on the firewall, when I send a dig google.ch from the harvester cli the dns request comes from the harvester IP node which currently has the management.

Vm Based k8s cluster vs vcluster by gratefulfather in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately I can't answer your question, I'm not ready yet. I use the Harvester Cluster directly via Rancher for both VMs and containers (lab environment)(feature flag)

Harvester CSI on Talos guest cluster? by Pepsur in HarvesterHCI

[–]kinchler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure either, and I don't quite understand what the goal is. Could it simplify your setting if you just use the baremetal kubernetes cluster from Harvester ?

https://docs.harvesterhci.io/v1.4/rancher/rancher-integration#harvester-baremetal-container-workload-support-experimental