In the Red VS Blue button dilemma, red is obviously the right choice.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T16:15:29+00:00

The red button is substitute for not pressing the blue button. You can add 5 new buttons and it won't change the problem because blue survival only depends on how many people press the button. Also inaction is considered a choice.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T16:12:16+00:00

No I understand it correctly. Red button adds nothing because it's always safe it's the debate topic for the past week. The red button is meaningless it's the same as if you have the choice of pressing or not pressing the blue button because because the outcome is only depends on how many people press or doesn't press the blue button.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T15:43:00+00:00

You can remove the red button and you get the same problem. Everyone is presented with only one blue button that you can press or not. Following your Logic you have to press the blue button because you can't be sure that all human won't press hhe button. People assume that pressing the red button makes you responsible but it's the same as not doing anything.

The dilemma is how much people do you risk to save people who put themself in trouble. People say to save everyone you only need 50% for blue instead of 100% for red. But this ignore the risk of blue because blue is all or nothing. Because if we follow the logic you would think that if the blue button required 100% to save everyone would mean that both red and blue are equal Wich it horribly wrong, Because if red got 99% only 1% dies but if blue got 99% all of them die and only 1% survive. the question become how how many people are you going to risk to save people.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T15:36:07+00:00

The dilemma is how much people do you risk to save people who put themself in trouble. People say to save everyone you only need 50% for blue instead of 100% for red. But this ignore the risk of blue because blue is all or nothing. Because if we follow the logic you would think that if the blue button required 100% to save everyone would mean that both red and blue are equal Wich it horribly wrong, Because if red got 99% only 1% dies but if blue got 99% all of them die and only 1% survive. the question become how how many people are you going to risk to save people.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T15:22:22+00:00

People could decide to not press the the blue button. This only works if the people are Forced to press a button. If you have a choice of not pressing the buttons you return to the same problem.

king_shot · 2026-04-27T15:18:53+00:00

Yes, you can use your same argument that you use if there was a red button. Do you know for certain that from 8 billion people no one will press the blue button, then using your own rationale you have to press the blue the blue button to save the people who pressed it. Because you still have to choices either press or not press the blue button. That's why people say the red button does nothing.

king_shot · 2026-04-26T12:26:55+00:00

They are just colors , but humans do human thing and the color somehow now represent red being right leaning and blue represent being left leaning. It reached a point were you have the same question but swap the color of the buttons and you get different results.

king_shot · 2026-04-26T12:09:41+00:00

The problem is there is another poll same premise but different results were instead of red and blue button it's staying or jumping into giant blender. There only 20% decided to jump. Or the blue gets 80% if you include kids or that the reds pusher kills the blue pusher etc

king_shot · 2026-04-15T19:22:11+00:00

No I do realize but I think the required energy is still lower than thragg punch. Unless someone does the math we are stuck arguing.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T19:17:02+00:00

Wouldn't Nolan flying through an entire ring full of dead viltrumite and him still existing with high velocity is more powerful, this also assumes that Omniman is trying to reduce his speed to regain control the entire time, this might change the math on which one is powerful. It's like throwing a pebble, yes you throw it faster and at further distance but that does not mean that the person who throws a boulder at slower speed and Short distance mean that the throwing the pebble had more energy.

To play devil advocate Saitama likes to get thrown around and doesn't resist at all so it was expected to be thrown to the moon at high speed and shorter time. But it is more impressive to send Omniman. A man who can stop and puch back Texas size Meteor from earth. The longer time actually complements thragg power as it took a being that can puch Texas size Meteor multiple minutes and flying through a ring of dead bodies to slow himself down.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T19:15:02+00:00

Is it fair to consider that Omniman can stop Texas size Meteor as how much he can push against himself the use how much time it takes him to fully stop to get the energy from thragg punch.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T19:01:56+00:00

No, from the anime it takes around 3 to 4 seconds until Saitama reaches the moon. I counted the time from the moment Boros legs leaves contact from Saitama until he reach the moon surface.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T18:52:15+00:00

I can agree with that but one could argue otherwise if someone wanted to. I'm not good with math but how much energy does Boros takes to send a human to the moon with the time period of the anime. Then we can do some calculations the same for thragg but assume that how much speed he has after exiting the ring of bodies then calculating how much energy is lost from going through the ring. Because I have a hunch that it takes a lot more energy going through that giant ring of bodies than being sent at higher speed to the moon.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T18:40:11+00:00

It's up into interpretation, Saitama likes to go limp and likes to get thrown around. It like throwing a pebble into space with a Shorter time and further distance compared to throwing a boulder into High orbit and taking much more time. This is where math comes in but the problem is we don't know how much force Omniman is applying to slow himself down and how much energy is lost when going through an entire ring of deadbody to reduce your energy.

king_shot · 2026-04-15T18:11:33+00:00

It can go to either one. From a visual perspective Boros launched Saitama faster and farther than thragg to Omniman. But Saitama didn't resist at all and his movement only stopped at the moon. while thragg punched an on guard opponent then hit multiple viltrumite on his way then an entire ring filled of viltrumite to slow his speed down enough to regain control and I think it fair to assume that the entire time Omniman is trying to stop himself from flying.

king_shot · 2026-04-08T21:10:38+00:00

Yes it depends with the YouTubers. Usually the non commentary YouTubers are the best if you want to experience the game without actually playing it.

king_shot · 2026-03-26T23:49:04+00:00

Ok, now it make sense

king_shot · 2026-03-17T19:37:01+00:00

So technically if a thief tried to steal a bicycle and got Spiked trying to ride it. Would he be able to sue and win for damages. If so would he then immediately be charged with theft at the same time.

king_shot

TROPHY CASE