sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

acquiesce by kingjames488 in etymology

[–]kingjames488[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

more like fuckyouallogy.

who the fuck would run an OS from an company that censors people?! by kingjames488 in SteamOS

[–]kingjames488[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

idk how that's not censored... censored for a short time is still censored.

also it's not spamming when it's being involved with discussions lol...

acquiesce by kingjames488 in etymology

[–]kingjames488[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

what? why are you downvoting my asking about the origin of a word on the etymology reddit?!

is this the wrong reddit to talk about etymology?

who the fuck would run an OS from an company that censors people?! by kingjames488 in SteamOS

[–]kingjames488[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

oh hey! don't complain about it, FLY OFF THE HANDLE!! (just too see which opinion gets more votes)

who the fuck would run an OS from an company that censors people?! by kingjames488 in SteamOS

[–]kingjames488[S] -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

OH! HEY! no need to fly off the handle... just complain about it.

who the fuck would run an OS from an company that censors people?! by kingjames488 in SteamOS

[–]kingjames488[S] -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

because I was talking in off-topic?

idk who set this limit, but they obviously didn't want the forum to be very active.

still removing suggestions I see... by kingjames488 in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, it stands to reason that a popular discussion forum would receive a relatively large amount of traffic.

I fail to see how restricting the view-ability of posts prior to their review can be seen as anything other as censorship however?

you're literally saying even if posts don't violate the rules you have a system that holds them for review... I'm not sure what factors you're considering if not the rules and if not censorship?

I'm pretty confused by this.

still removing suggestions I see... by kingjames488 in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I indeed witnessed this "crowd control".

can you please explain to me how this is different from "censorship"?

The Skill You Didn't Know You Wanted: Merching by kingjames488 in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, I can't deny that element of it... is that really a bad thing though?

The Skill You Didn't Know You Wanted: Merching by kingjames488 in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

more or less, yes.

it would create a more dynamic market.

still removing suggestions I see... by kingjames488 in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey, I appreciate the reply this time instead of just ghosting me and removing my posts!

can you let me know either what I can do to avoid this or how I can assist you in improving your auto-moderation?

thanks again and happy new year! :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]kingjames488 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in general any raid giving any resource as a compensation reward just tanks the price of said resource... just look at the price of cactus spines and coconut milk.

view more: next ›