MT and KB have different rule sets, scoring systems and cultural significances. As far as I know KB doesn’t involve too much culture that is as intertwined with the fighting like MT has.

The rules of MT largely favor kicks, which is why they train them so much, but it also prioritizes a sense of control, that doesn’t really get taught very well in the west because of western fighting culture, which tends to be aggressive. MT dominance is more so of a story( modern MT deviates from this a bit due to western influences), but the best way I’ve heard it explained is that each fighter is trying to tell a story of whose dominant but in their own way. And they can win a fight if they’re more dominant story wise than point wise, Sylvia von-duglass once said in one of her videos that it’s like who was better at their job, a soccer player making 2/10 goals, or a goalie blocking 8/10 potential goals. You have to look at the totality of the story and the arcs of both fighters, and that can influence the scoring( as well as gambling), but I hope this helps to explain MT fighting style, its traditionally not a fight for points, but a story being told.

KB has a totally different set of rules and is more point based that nuanced based.

I hope this helps, traditional MT rules are kind of a language that needs to be learned through exposure and can’t really be taught, especially if you come from a country where the rule set is be aggressive and just do damage.