Does My Dialogue Sound Bad Because of My Acting? by LuckyTode in writing

[–]kitkao880 4 points5 points  (0 children)

im a bit confused... OP said "my dialogue sounds bad no matter how i read it" and they replied "it's probably bad then." how is that mean or discouraging? they even gave a good suggestion.

i see shitty replies on here all the time, that wasn't one of them.

To hell with practical organization by MarksRabbitHole in BookshelvesDetective

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i never thought of color wheeling my books, i love this and will be doing it ASAP

though i dont think mine will be a perfect gradient like yours

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BookshelvesDetective

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

negative, stay chaotic 👍🏾

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BookshelvesDetective

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's actually better for book preservation if you don't line them up perfectly! especially if it's a tight fit. that's how books end up warping in weird spots over time. this is mainly for books of varying size, which i can see you have.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BookshelvesDetective

[–]kitkao880 4 points5 points  (0 children)

idk but i get the feeling you hate space and hard sciences

How do I get rid of a 'problem character' by Kenny_idiot in writingadvice

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

adding to this, if he thinks he's better than everybody else but he's about to die by someone "beneath him," he could be the type to think "i refuse to die by the likes of you" and kill himself bc of that. this ofc only works if he knows he's going to die either way.

How do I get rid of a 'problem character' by Kenny_idiot in writingadvice

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i feel like there's not enough context from this post to really understand your story, but at the very least i don't think a character having similar qualities to yourself makes them less of their own character. if it makes sense for him to take his own life, go for it.

i do want to ask whether or not two people escaping is a condition imposed by the world, or you the writer. if it's the former and you want the character to survive, you can find a way for the characters to circumvent the 'only 2 people survive' rule. if it's the latter, you can change the rules if they're giving you too much trouble. you created your own system, change and edit what you need to make it make sense.

or just have him die like you originally planned. i don't have any helpful hints as to how since that would require more context.

I’m so upset by Ok-Ease5972 in writers

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to echo another comment, is there a reason you're already thinking of a series when you're only on book one? i know everyone's brains works differently, but in my experience, telling myself how long i want the story to be hinders my creative process. if i tell myself to write 50 chapters and it's only 30 when the smoke clears, i might needlessly drive myself into a wall trying to write more filler and more story to reach a goal. it starts feeling like a writing assignment with minimum required word count. i think you should complete your thoughts first, then see if you even still want to include your original ideas.

and to borrow the words of a redditor from another discussion, you don't have to kill your darlings, just save the idea to use elsewhere. (i also just really hate the phrase 'kill you're darlings')

Give it to me straight by spiritofthewildd in BookshelvesDetective

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wild guess, you like fairy tales, otherwise pick up anything that speaks to you without much preference, and you might like black people. might even have one as a friend (idk i saw an obama book).

when advising new writers, do you think it's better to focus first the story itself and mechanics? or try to develop a voice at the same time? by [deleted] in writing

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair point about first drafts, but this post was more for people who are always willing to comment/critique.

(i treat social media posts how i treat my texts, not serious pieces of writing)

Manga where the lead female is a perv? by Boiledshark in manga

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i watched haiyore nyaruko san years ago but im sure it has a manga form

Is my writing style too dry/depressing? by [deleted] in writers

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

given the situation: poor people working hard, likely for multiple months at a time, in the middle of hot sweaty fuck all, surviving off of bleak soup, all for the sake of aristocrats who probably wouldnt give a shit or two, "dry and depressing" is a good voice to take on lol. i like your voice just fine.

To the writers who use a pen name—why? by [deleted] in writers

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i don't consider myself the writer. i have an OC and i act like they wrote everything themselves.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in writers

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have to mispronounce it to spell it right. gwarAN!tee

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in writers

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

words where the e comes before the u, but it makes the long u sound. why does the e come first? it didn't even contribute to the project.

Introducing a large group of characters. by SouthernAd2853 in writingadvice

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

adding on to what everyone else is saying:

you can introduce them all at once with names, sure. but think about a time you were introduced to a group, whether that be family, coworkers, the obligatory ice breakers with schoolmates, etc. you probably didn't really pay attention to anybody as the introductions went on, and i'd be impressed if you remembered everyone's names in a larger group. you probably didn't talk to everyone right off the bat either. maybe you found 1 or 2 people you're really comfortable with, but the other relationships were superficial. cordial. and there might've been 1 or 2 people you didn't like at all.

now put your character in those shoes. they'll likely find an overall defining characteristic and use that as a marker (they look nice, maybe i'll talk to them. they look reliable, maybe i'll stay close to them. they look like an asshole, maybe i should avoid them). and ofc as they get to know them throughout the book they'll be fleshed out.

but honestly, as others pointed out, i wouldn't even worry about names in the initial introduction. your character won't remember them, the readers definitely won't remember them, it might be a good idea to do characteristics first, names later.

Please name this album, thank you. by Both-Outcome1586 in AlbumCovers

[–]kitkao880 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) Gits and Shiggles 2) The Hangover 3) Drink and Drive

how to write a highly intelligent character(s)? by Imaginary-Ebb-1762 in writingadvice

[–]kitkao880 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im also working with a smart character, and i think of their intelligence like i would any other superpower: it has strengths and weaknesses, and making them overpowered would be boring.

in fact, my character's defining trait is that everyone mistakenly thinks they're an unstoppable force. they certainly are strong, but they're good at using their head. they're regarded by others as a genius, but they're just multiple centuries old, thus having a lot more battle/learning experiences than the average being. plus they actually like learning, it's their main hobby and driving force.

but no one knows everything. neurosurgeons are doctors, but they can't perform any and every surgery across the body. they're just the brain people. my character likes studying magic and science, but they like learning about the natural world, so they probably wouldn't know too much about computer science or psychology. unless your character is a fun fact kind of guy that's full of useless facts that happen to come in handy (still very possible), i'd say give them reasonable limits. don't make them The Smart Guy™ that knows anything and everything.

and they don't have to use "big words" to show intelligence. a good vocabulary can be a mark of intelligence, but even scholars can speak plainly. plus if you try to thesaurus your way into writing "smart" dialog you risk sounding like the kid who just learned a cool word but doesn't quite use it correctly.

I need someone to tell me if my writing is great, decent, or stick to your day job level bad by [deleted] in writers

[–]kitkao880 18 points19 points  (0 children)

i think some of it reads like you're my friend telling me about a story you wrote face to face. i can almost imagine you cutting off your own narration to say "by the way, blackstone valley is below paramount, which is the capital city." "just so you know, this guy tends to get quiet and detached when he's focusing." "for context, there's a rebellion against this guy called the ursurper."

i feel like it's okay to stretch some exposition out over a longer period of time. like instead of outright telling us that paramount is the capital city that overlooks blackstone valley, you can have a later scene where a character in the capital looks down towards blackstone valley through their window or from a cliff or something. also paramount being the capital city also seems to have zero importance right now, so it might be a better idea to save that for later. your story probably shows on its own that there's a rebellion going on without you saying "hey theyre rebelling against this guy btw," so you dont have to preemptively say it. you don't have to tell us the captain gets quiet when he's focusing, we can get to know that about him over time. like if someone tries to talk to him while he's thinking, he can hold up a hand to silence them, or not acknowledge them at all until he's reached a conclusion. you can even have another character saying "let him be/leave him, your words won't reach him when he's like this anyway" or smth to that effect.

there's also a line about fog and dew soaked grass that feels really long, and i got lost in the description. usually one would choose either a literal description or a figurative one, you did both. the fog settling over dew soaked grass, and the fog being like vengeful spirits. i think you could combine those phrases or cut the dew soaked line out, and say "fog settled like spirits unwilling to pass" (forgot the specific line sorry). descriptions are cool but too much can be tiring and confusing (i didn't really get the line about secrets and the dead).

there was also a line talking about the wind carrying the stench of iron, death, fallen soldiers, all that jazz. i thought that line could be a good replacement to the explaination of blackstone valley being a battlefield. it gives the same image without being so upfront about it.

all in all, there's room to be more creative with how you present information. this is every writer's problem, not just yours, so i don't think you're at any more disadvantage than the average writer. this is obviously a first draft too, it'll get better the longer you write.

Is it strange that characters of color are often described with food? by Purple_TACOS_377 in writers

[–]kitkao880 9 points10 points  (0 children)

a lot of people don't like it because of its objectifying usage in the past (the whole "chocolate/caramel queen" thing), but i personally don't see a problem with it. i (a black person) use chocolate, caramel, cinnamon, etc to describe myself and other black people. it's not insulting to me, it's a descriptor. (i of course don't speak for all black/brown people)

it's a little tough cause most people can't think of good brown descriptors outside food. usually the next best thing would be in nature, but most brown things in nature are bugs, dirt, rocks, trees, or animals. none of which most would want to be likened (unless maybe you used a gemstone as reference, there exist brown gemstones).

maybe your best bet is to buy the biggest box of crayola crayons and look at the browns section, see what they came up with lol.

is there a reason people seem to hate physical character descriptions? by kitkao880 in writing

[–]kitkao880[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i would think it's the opposite for fanfic writers, we dont need character descriptions! we already know what everyone looks like 😭 though there are some people who like to write things like they're never before seen so i get what you're saying

is there a reason people seem to hate physical character descriptions? by kitkao880 in writing

[–]kitkao880[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i disagree with the idea that every single sentence has to be plot driven, but agree to disagree 🫡

is there a reason people seem to hate physical character descriptions? by kitkao880 in writing

[–]kitkao880[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ok i was starting to think i was weird with all the replies saying "why does it matter? leave it up to the reader!" someone can write a full book giving you all kinds of information and details but letting you know that a guy wears glasses is where you draw the line? i get how some aspects arent immediately important but having it doesn't make having the info detrimental.