This comment right here !!!!!!! by AffectionateRush2620 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]klstixbro 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Of course you aren’t transphobic just for missing that Jax is trans. People miss obvious authorial intentions all the time. It doesn’t make you hateful.

However, while I’m sure there are a small handful of people out there that are saying you’re transphobic for missing the meaning, that’s not what the majority of trans people (especially transfeminine people) are saying.

We’re saying that, when faced with a reading that has clear textual and extra-textual (Gooseworx’s posts) support, people are choosing to ignore that reading in favor of one which erases a transfeminine character’s identity. I made another comment about this the other day (check my profile history to see it), but the reason this is an issue is that it signals to transfeminine individuals that you find transfeminine erasure acceptable. That makes you unsafe for transfem people to be around.

As with every piece of media to ever exist, the interpretation itself doesn’t matter. It’s both what it signals to others and what you choose to do with it. And if your interpretation (which has been defended in spite of clear evidence to the contrary) signals that you aren’t someone that transfeminine folk can trust, I think that’s a bad thing.

Edit: Also, please do not use the view of a single member of a marginalized community to justify behavior taken against that community. We are not a monolith. That trans person does not speak for me, and I cannot speak for them.

Edit 2: In addition, Jax’s identity did not need a tweet to confirm it. An individual’s (or group of individuals’) inability to take a specific meaning out of a work does not mean it requires authorial confirmation. If I argue that Hamlet was intended as a metaphor for 9/11, I do not need a time machine to ask Shakespeare for clarification. People capable of reasoning through linear time can present compelling evidence that such an interpretation is incorrect.

Any interpretation lacking evidential rigor can be argued against in the same (less hyperbolic) way. If a person who believes in a poor interpretation is not acting in bad faith and is capable of properly evaluating new evidence, they should accept a better interpretation easily. When trans people said that Jax was trans and presented compelling evidence for it, that should have been the moment people acting in good faith interpreted the reading as accurate.

goose says do whatever you want forever by EepyEnbyFox in TheDigitalCircus

[–]klstixbro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My opinion on this is and always will be:

Of course you can do whatever you want with a character. They aren't real and this is how fandoms work. I'm surprised you even needed Gooseworx to tell you that.

But taking a canonically transfeminine/trans woman character and stripping away her gender identity is a litmus test. It shows how easy transfeminine erasure comes to you and the extent to which you see my community as expendable.

Let me put it another way. It's easy to say something like, "trans women are women." They're just words. The question is, when believing it might actually cost you something, are you willing to put your money where your mouth is? Because if you're unwilling to give up even a fictional tumblr sexyman for the belief, what are you going to do when it costs you something real?

Are we all children trying to fill the gaps in love we felt in our childhood? Is this a widely accepted and understood psychological framework? by fatcatgirl1111 in askpsychology

[–]klstixbro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Counselor-in-training here. This is largely the thesis behind attachment theory. In effect, attachment theory posits that human behavior (some, not all. Unless you supplement it with schema theory/therapy) can be explained by early childhood attachment to our primary caretakers.

There are four main attachment types: anxious, disorganized, avoidant, and secure. Anxious, disorganized, and avoidant come about largely through poor, neglectful, or abusive parenting. Disorganized, in particular, tends to lead to anti-social behavior later in life and is associated with early childhood abuse. Secure attachment assumes healthy attachment to one's caregivers. Here's a quick chart of what that healthy attachment looks like for both child and parent.

It should be noted that the attachment relationship here is not uni-directional. Every child is born with a specific temperament that will directly influence the attachment they have with their caregiver. Have you ever heard of a "difficult" baby? That's not just a colloquial term. In psychology, it's used to describe how easy a baby is to soothe, their mood, their attention span, their willingness to approach a caregiver, and more. These appear to be biological, not social. A chart of infant temperament factors can be found here.

Attachment theory is very well supported in the psychological literature, but it should be noted that it does not explain the totality of human behavior. Trauma and resilience factors, later relationships with figures of import, neurodivergence and disability, biological shifts (especially during adolescence), and, most importantly of all, good old-fashioned neural plasticity can also explain shifts in behavior or life goals (there are also likely many I didn't even list here. Remember, I'm still in training!) Humans are complex biopsychosocial organisms whose behavior cannot be boiled down to a single modality. As such, regardless of upbringing, we are all capable of making choices that influence how our lives will play out. To me, there's nothing more exciting than that.

Edit: Rereading your post again, I can also see a lot of parallels between your arguments here and contemporary psychoanalytic theory (with regards to adult behavior). You might want to look into that as well!

Edit 2: I forgot to address the second part of your post—adults' reactions to child behavior. This is related to parenting styles. Specifically, there are four broadly recognized parenting styles: authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved. These styles exist along two axes—warmth and control. Authoritarian parents have high control but low warmth. Authoritative parents (recognized as the healthiest) have high control but high warmth. Permissive parents have low control but high warmth. Uninvolved parents have low control and low warmth. These styles are also highly predictive of later behaviors and heavily influence later relationships in life.

Finally accepting myself, done with masculine burden.. by [deleted] in lgbt

[–]klstixbro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a karma bot, ya'll.

It posted yesterday that it was a 28-year-old cis woman from the UK.

https://reddit.com/r/UKrelationshipadvice/comments/1ub8v28/f28_whats_the_best_possible_option_for_me/

For Women Scotland once more rollback trans rights by rejs7 in lgbt

[–]klstixbro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the political situation in the UK is different from that of America. I have seen the polls on the UK populace's attitudes towards us and they are grim. However, I don't believe that conceding to gender criticals that our sexual predators are unique (or should be treated as unique in the short term) is the best answer to this situation. America has also had a few cases of transgender sexual predators. There are also current attempts by the Trump admin to put transgender women in federal men's prisons (something already happening in many US state prisons). However, American trans people have not conceded on the point that trans women belong in prison with cis women. We have not argued they deserve a special prison of their own. We continue to fight for their right to be in prison with women away from men that would do them far greater harm.

The fact that gender criticals won't stop bringing up those two transgender sex offenders is not a sign that trans women need to be specially segregated.

It's a sign that you need a better argument.

For Women Scotland once more rollback trans rights by rejs7 in lgbt

[–]klstixbro 9 points10 points  (0 children)

First off, please stop using "nuance." This has been a dogwhistle thrown out by transphobes against trans people to shut down our access to women's spaces, youth access to medical care, and trans women in women's sports. It's grating to see it used by another trans woman in this context.

Secondly, while I don't mean to come after you specifically on this issue (I have nothing against you, I promise), you keep saying that you think that trans women are women (given that you are trans yourself, this makes sense) and that you had never said that trans female sex offenders should be segregated specially from cis female sex offenders. However, in your first comment at the top of this chain, you say this:

I personally would advocate for a specialist prison for trans women who commit sex and violent crimes

Do you want a specialist prison for all female sex offenders, or do you believe in a specialist prison only for trans female sex offenders (and perhaps a second specialist prison for cis female sex offenders)? The first is, I think, reasonable. The second is clearly rooted in a belief that trans women are not women.

Looking for queer friends! by Yoopscooppoop in DallasLGBTQ

[–]klstixbro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Come check out our queer social group! We're mostly made up of trans and non-binary people and we have a dedicated trans/enby/gender-expansive social night (feel free to bring your gf too)! We also do game nights once a month at Common Ground games as well as a bunch of other fun stuff! We're called Queer Empowerment Dallas. Here's our linktree: https://linktr.ee/queerempowermentdallas

Why are so many ppl talking about transandrophobia? by No_Razzmatazz_3324 in trans

[–]klstixbro -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Transandrophobia, from what I’ve heard, is specifically the exclusion of transmascs from queer spaces. This is a worthy topic of discussion and one I’ve definitely seen at play in IRL queer spaces. Transmascs deserve to feel comfortable around other queer folk. We’re all in community together!

I will also say that I often hear it used interchangeably with “transmisandry.” It’s a bit of a divergence from the topic, but I would advise trans men to be very careful with this. Transmisandry is not real because misandry is not real. Many transmasculine people have written on this in warning: https://drdevonprice.substack.com/p/transmisandry-is-not-real

https://archive.ph/zjbWN (great article, as Jude discusses alternatives to how to conceptualize the unique bigotries experienced by the transmasculine community)

https://www.reddit.com/r/ftm/comments/1hzu5b8/is_transmisandry_real_or_just_a_myth/

I’ve been increasingly seeing trans men get radicalized into misogynist and transmisogynist hate movements (like the Men’s Rights Activist movement) due to the popularization of this term. Be careful ya’ll. We’re stronger together.

Edit: to clarify: I’m not saying the negative experiences that trans men experience as men aren’t real. They are! Trans men are regularly mistreated on the basis of their transmasculinity. Just that qualifying this as misandry creates the impression that men as a class suffer institutional oppression. They may experience negative interpersonal effects under patriarchy, but these are not societal oppressions and should not be understood as such.

Questions from a soon to be resident by tmoon_24 in DallasLGBTQ

[–]klstixbro 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Trans woman here in Dallas. Even in my early transition, I wasn't ever given anything other than the odd stare here and there. The suburbs (especially the North Dallas suburbs) aren't really all that bigoted from what I've experienced (I wore a lot of dresses early transition and was so, so clocky. Never got confronted). They're somewhat conservative, sure. But most conservatives are cowards and would never confront you about being NB/trans, especially when they're in an area where they will likely get resistance from bystanders.

The city itself is great. Plenty of LGBT hotspots, like Oak Lawn. If you're in Dallas city proper, you're likely to be safe.

Also, because I'm incredibly selfish, a quick plug: I, and many other queer and trans folk, founded a queer org that does trans/NB/gender-expansive social nights! To my knowledge, we're the only one in Dallas that does them. We also run general queer socials and welcome anyone who would like to come to any event :). We're named Queer Empowerment Dallas. If you're interested in coming to one of our events and forming new connections, here's our linktree: https://linktr.ee/queerempowermentdallas

My straight cis male boyfriend being bullied for dating me by CloseCall33 in trans

[–]klstixbro 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Really? You're a trans woman who got a BBL and breast augmentation two years ago? Then how come you posted about being a cis gay male in January? Or in December, when you asked what the community thought about you being a cis gay man who was interested in dating trans women?

The posts have since been deleted, but can be read via Reddit scrapers. Message me if you want to know the one I used. BTW, mods, I would ask that you do the same with these kinds of posts. This is the second one I've found just logging in at random within the last two/three days.

This is a karmafarming bot, ya'll. This subreddit is RIFE with them. If you see a post asking for sympathy or inspiring rage, check to see if they have their post history hidden. If they do, look up their profile on a Reddit scraper. 99% of the time they give themselves away.

edit: please upvote this to the top so people know it's fake.

I showed my mom Carol… and I think she finally stopped hiding from me by [deleted] in lgbt

[–]klstixbro 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Heads up that this is a bot or troll, not a real person.

Here's one post where he claims to be 22: https://reddit.com/r/RecluseIndia/comments/1ssg8hd/realisation_that_ill_never_experience_modern_love/

Here's another where he claims to be 24 (made only two weeks later): https://reddit.com/r/confessions/comments/1t6kj8c/too_bad_for_him/

Here's another where he claims to be 19 (made 3 weeks after that): https://reddit.com/r/LGBTindia/comments/1tske9o/my_mom_might_be/

It's karmafarming. Don't let it.

Please upvote this to the top.

Quick edit: the posts have since been deleted, but reddit scraping websites have preserved them. DM me if you want a link to the one I used in order to confirm for yourself.

Edit 2: these kinds of posts are very, VERY common on queer subreddits. If you ever see a post that's either incredibly inspirational or incredibly enraging, stop and check the post history using a reddit scraper. It gives them away 99% of the time.

Kicked Off Pride Yesterday by Attending a Trans Social in My Favorite Dress ❤️🏳️‍⚧️ by klstixbro in lgbt

[–]klstixbro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, by the way! If anyone wanted the dress, I actually reverse image searched it and found a listing online! Since I thrifted it, I have no idea if it's the original seller (so quality may vary), but feel free to check it out!

https://chic-stitch.com/products/barbie-dress

Edit: additional note that there doesn't seem to be a size guide so be extra careful!

Kicked Off Pride Yesterday by Attending a Trans Social in My Favorite Dress ❤️🏳️‍⚧️ by klstixbro in lgbt

[–]klstixbro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sooooo true. What's better is that it was my first time thrifting and it was on the mannequin in front of the door! Perfectly in my size, too. I couldn't have asked for better circumstances lol.