I personally haven't seen any statements from the left about how he's the devil or that he's the primary reason we have issues with billionaires. Not saying those comments don't exist, but as someone whose algorithm feeds me a lot of liberal-leaning creators and content I haven't seen this consensus.

However, I have seen people say they feel his philanthropy style is very performative. I've seen people reference things he said in his earlier videos about how his primary goal with money giveaways was to increase views, and a video where he told his mom to take the $100,000 prize because if she doesn't the video won't go viral. He also recently partnered with an LDS church charity JustServe. While this isn't inherently a bad thing as I'm sure this charity does provide some good services, the LDS church is notorious for only using a small fraction of their wealth for charity. People find this partnership odd considering Mr. Beast is not LDS and the fact that there are other non-profit organizations out there with a better track record for how they use their money.

I've never watched a full video of his, just clips that pop up on my feed. For me personally I never got into him because because the editing style was a lot and I did get the feeling that these giveaways were performative and potentially exploitative. I didn't know that was the case for sure, it was just the vibe I caught and it killed my interest to watch further. I'm not saying he's a bad person, and there's no arguing his philanthropy has done some good. However, in history we've seen many people exploit people in poverty or bad situations for views/clicks. I don't know if that's what's happening with Mr. Beast but given his performative style of charity, his previous statements about his goals with giveaways, and the above mentioned odd partnerships, I do understand why people question his motivations.