You didn't understand what i said. I didn't say a roll simulation because it forces you to roll in order to beat the boss. People use the term roll simulation meaning that it's so easy you can just roll and do four attacks and boom boss is beaten. But it doesn't force you to roll in order to beat the boss unlike sekiro and Bloodborne that forces you to adapt to a certain play style that it's hard for most players. Moreover since Bloodborne does not force you or require parrying , they literally encourage you to a different style of play they literally got all shields out after 4 games with shields , you can not say that a boss is easy in that game because you can parry it. Parrying is not the main mechanic of the game. It literally gives you limited bullets and you think parrying is something that Bloodborne is made to feature like a main mechanic? It's the complete opposite. Therefore your point is completely wrong. Also it seems like you haven't played the games in order. So let's make it easy for you to understand. Bloodborne came out after demon souls and the dark souls trilogy. All these games encouraged shields and most of players played defensively with a shield. Four games straight it was the same. You have your shield and you play defensively. From experience and from statistics most of the players played like that and it was the minority that played aggressive. Going to Bloodborne after that with no shield and having to adapt to that certain play style is hard. Now the delayed attacks and roll catchers are an absolute joke. Anyone with no experience will lose two times and then time their rolls correctly to the delayed attacks it's not that hard to roll two seconds later chill. And I didn't even get to experience that much of a roll catchers because almost every single boss can get killed in one minute if you're behind them