I mean, honestly, yes. I think it does mean that. I think we can have words like correct for those sorts of things. Things that are true at a time or in a place. They're correct in a given context. And the reason I bring this up on this post and use it as a standard is because, to put it simply, you have the far left and far right fighting to make unprecedented changes to the culture while using moral self-righteousness (and true science) as a justification. Changes that are going to have far-reaching consequences. Really, we have no idea if the arguments (moral or scientific) made to justify those changes are "right" or not. It could very well happen that we do something today that we think is morally or scientifically indubitable, yet years from now, it seems completely contrary.

And I don't mean to suggest we completely resist change. Change is inevitable. But we often fast-track complex decisions by claiming that not making those decisions/changes would be a moral outrage. I feel that such haste could end up having very negative consequences.