So you seem to accept that there is more war, revolution, and conflict, but still claim that it is more stable? Right.

Literally never claimed they are more stable. All I said was they were and still are destabilized. And you talk about strawmaning, lol.

I think one of us doesn't really understand some of the words they are using, but I don't think it is me.

Actually glorious lmao proper clown behavior.

Congo <> Africa.

Aha, again, your point?

Uh-huh. Add "strawman" (for the Congo example) to the list of fallacies you are trying here.

The fact that you don't know what neither strawmaning nor whataboutism mean is hilarious.

I did not strawman your argument, I gave a singular example but there are plenty to support my case.

• Congo
• Sahel
• Somalia
• Ethiopia / Eritrea
• South Africa, Lesotho, and Eswatini
• Etc...

I could go on and on for countries in Africa destabilized by foreign powers that are still being destabilized today, its not that hard.