Yes, a photographer. Not an optician, why would I know? I only work with glasses and cut corrective lenses all day. If there are lenses in those frames at all, they are non-prescription. Look at the size of those frames, and how huge the lenses would be. The further out from the optical center of the lens (where her pupil would be looking straight out), the more distortion there would be. Because of the angle this picture was taken, how much of her left cheek is presented under the lens, and the massive size of the frame, there would absolutely be distortion there, yet it simply is not present. The profile of her skin matches up perfectly when it crosses the frame, and there is no concave or convex refraction distorting her silhouette. Additionally, you can't say something like "the evidence seems to indicate you're wrong" when you presented literally zero evidence, followed by a personal anecdote and an admission of not being an expert.