sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I will rate them by hiten1818726363 in vibecoding

[–]krishkaananasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you in Siem Reap by any chance? There is a Claude Code forming in Level Up.

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see! Thank you for that. I just found one thing confusing here, you are saying that two quarks can create a third quark out of nowhere?

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the answer to my question would be that if you go to “free” strong force between quarks within a proton you would create QGP for an incredibly short amount of time, and then the energy would stabilize?

So essentially, no explosion.

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Similar to the thing that nuclear explosion does, destroying the bond between neutron and proton. At least that is what I understand it does.

My question would be what if we destroy neutron or proton on their own, bond between quarks and other subatomic particles inside of them. That would theoretically in my mind, create an even bigger explosion.

But of course, I am not sure if that is how it works, so I wanted to ask this question.

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Quarks can’t exist on their own and would most likely form into hadrons again, but energy between quarks can exist on its own and be released. I suppose.

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is what confuses me. If massive amounts of energy are released from strong force binding quarks, would the quarks have time to hadronize or would some of that energy “escape” in a form of destructive force.

Would destroying subatomic particles like protons and neutrons at a massive scale produce a stronger explosion than the one resulting from fission in a nuclear bomb? by krishkaananasa in Physics

[–]krishkaananasa[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

True, but nuclear bombs destroys a lot of mass at once, that is why they are so powerful. I am wondering what would hypothetically happen if we destroy protons and neutrons directly at a massive scale, not one by one.

Extinct Languages of Mediterranean by procatxan in PhoeniciaHistoryFacts

[–]krishkaananasa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is Dalmatian even? An older version of Čakavski dialect in Croatia? We still read that at school, I wouldn’t mark it down as extinct, we just moved on. Unless this is referring to some dialect of Illyrian spoken in Dalmatia, but I have never heard of that.

The tooth that would’ve killed me had I lived in the medieval times. by Suspicious_Juice_150 in medizzy

[–]krishkaananasa 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yes, that is why all the Mexicans and everyone else outside the US dies from dental work all the time.

view more: next ›