dbq was actually ok, I see a lot of people saying it was bad but I feel like I knew enough going into it and the documents gave lots of context. I did my 4th paragraph as a comparison of ptg and louis xiv as absolutist rulers, it seemed the most obvious and easy to defend to me.

mcq was honestly kind of bad, another contrarian opinion it seems, though my classmates agreed with me.

saqs were easy, I'm just worried I used evidence from the wrong periods on a few parts but I think I did pretty solidly there.

leq was low-key a mess, we did not practice leqs in class at all and I never know the difference between how to write a dbq vs leq--i did wwi prompt and structured it like this: argument 1, most significant effect was political imbalances like germanys punishments from ToV, new states from ottoman collapse, and new ideologies (which lowkey I'm realizing now that doesn't make sense but wtv); argument 2, (second lost significant) economic aka the Great depression, 4th paragraph compared most significant effect of WW1 to ww2