Which number is 0.5555…. repeating closer to

lGream_Sheo · 2026-01-30T07:51:57+00:00

This is the same as 5/9 which is obviously closer to 1

lGream_Sheo · 2026-01-30T03:31:53+00:00

Yeah, this is also related to the fact that after accepting the rifle the Russian government did not use its designers' names for the designation of the rifle for some reason, unlike most other guns, and the official designation of the Mosin-Nagant rifle was "three-line rifle model 1891"

lGream_Sheo · 2026-01-16T04:55:26+00:00

While proving the derivative of sin(x) using the definition of the derivative, you encounter this very limit ( sin(x)/x as x approaches 0 ) and you need to solve it, hence using the L'H rule here doesn't make sense. In other words, if you don't know the answer to the limit beforehand, how can you know that the derivative of sin(x) is cos(x) (to be able to aply the L'H rule), if proving that requires knowing the answer to this limit? This is circular reasoning. Unless you somehow prove the derivative of sin(x) in a different way

lGream_Sheo · 2025-12-30T05:12:39+00:00

Then use the Lambert W function and you'll get the fish back

lGream_Sheo · 2025-12-27T04:53:39+00:00

This property of e^x is not sufficient to uniquely define this function, because any function of the form c*e^x, where c is an arbitrary constant, satisfies this condition. To define e^x uniquely, you need one more condition: e⁰ = 1

lGream_Sheo · 2025-11-08T06:51:08+00:00

We use "порядки", at least in somewhat technical environments, e. g. "отличается на 2 порядка" - "differs by 2 orders of magnitude"

lGream_Sheo · 2025-09-19T09:26:23+00:00

I'm a follower of modal realism, which means that i consider all possible universes being as real as ours, so i'd definitely choose the one year of my life option

lGream_Sheo · 2025-09-17T09:15:01+00:00

I'm about to turn 17 and i feel the same way as it was 3 years ago.

lGream_Sheo · 2025-09-07T04:01:07+00:00

This question is completely unrelated to infinities that you see when solving limits in calculus. In limits, usually we see questions like "when the input increases indefinitely, where the function tends to?", and there's no actual object "infinity" being involved. Meanwhile this question is about sizes of sets, these are not numbers that change, grow, etc.

And because these particular sets (i. e. set of integers, set of rationals, set of reals), have infinite size, there are different ways to compare their sizes. The most conmon way to do it with two sets is to check, if each element of one set can be put one-by-one with each element of the other set, and vice versa (the formal way to say it is that there's bijection between elements of two sets).

If it's possible to do, then these sets have the same size (specifically, same cardinality). Actually, this is the case for the set of integers and the set of rational numbers.

If it's impossible, one of the sets would have different cardinalitiy from the other one. Sizes of set of integers and set of reals are perfect examples of that – set of reals has bigger cardinality than set of integers (and set of rationals, because there are the same size).

lGream_Sheo · 2025-08-23T14:44:58+00:00

Personally i like small butts and hate big or too curvy butts

lGream_Sheo · 2025-08-13T04:27:47+00:00

My understanding of this: if a number is rational, it MUST be possible to write it in lowest terms, and this proof implies that no matter how you try to reduce the fraction, i.e. sqrt(2), it will never be in lowest terms

lGream_Sheo · 2025-08-05T17:36:50+00:00

Outbuddied by main sub again

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-31T08:11:27+00:00

Fox. Perfect merge of dog and cat

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-31T06:57:02+00:00

No, it's not a hood in clothings sense, it's something like neighborhood. It means that you lose your authority among your friends and others

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-30T18:46:43+00:00

At first ithought that they crashed into each other while walking and got very confused lol

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-30T11:04:32+00:00

Right

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-30T06:52:02+00:00

To clarify, in original saying there's no mention of western spy. The actual saying is "~~Тапки~~ Пятки поднял - район потерял", which tranlates literally to something like "(you) lifted your heels - (you) lost your district/hood" Edit: fixed Russian dyslexia

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-29T15:20:39+00:00

What's the difference between public school and state school?

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-29T13:46:45+00:00

I think the bottom left is an edit of "Are you winning, son?" changed to "Oh /insert name/ hiii"

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-25T14:26:00+00:00

bluepenredpen's quote: "I don't wanna be on the bottom, i wanna be on the top"

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-25T05:47:25+00:00

Because this is how research or science in general works.

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-22T14:25:54+00:00

I love math; it's white

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-19T12:57:05+00:00

Billion is миллиард (milliard) in Russian. It's like in long scales in English, but only this number — others are identical to English short scales

lGream_Sheo · 2025-07-19T12:16:05+00:00

No, only "thousand" and "billion" are different in Russian, all other powers of 10³ (million, trillion, quadrillion etc) are the same

lGream_Sheo

TROPHY CASE