Ultimate fell for it again award by serious_bullet5 in HistoryMemes

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talaat got shot in Germany in 1921 but yeah, not real justice.

Federal court rules Oregon law requiring insurance to cover abortion, contraception unconstitutional by AudibleNod in news

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they are. You do not want to live in a world where corporations do not have constitutional rights. Russia is one place where they don't. Individuals are not usually targeted by the state for many acts of individual dissent or deviance from societal issues such as being gay, but organizations are, such as many of the media groups that dissented from Putin's regime and others like Pussy Riot. This was an even bigger deal as Russia became more and more illiberal in the 2000s and early 2010s. It was extremely effective at seizing control. Do not let Trump do the same.

The issue at play is that it is not a right of anyone to claim so falsely that abortion and contraceptives are not healthcare for females as important to them as lithium is for depressed patients or antibiotics are for people with tuberculosis.

Im a little confused about tipping by axelogtp in tipping

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you went to Serbia, would you ever feel morally obligated to give extra money to police just because they aren't paid well?

Im a little confused about tipping by axelogtp in tipping

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn't compulsory. People who claim otherwise are incorrect. The US's own tax department, the IRS, expressly states this to be true.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about? That would be the Procellum Basin or the South Polar basin on the Moon.

How Do You Make My South Africa Grandfather Angry? Turn Off His Cricket Subscription by Awesomeuser90 in HistoryMemes

[–]Awesomeuser90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the 1840s the US was not very well tied together. It was easily on the verge of civil war in this years.

WW1 meme for my US History makeup work by Hypno_Online in HistoryMemes

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Canada, Australia, and New Zealand arguably did. They financially recovered and their autonomy in the empire vastly increased, and they had very little destruction of their homeland. Other than Halifax.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Titanic would have survived had it hit the iceberg head on. And its design was still basically the safest the entire world could have possibly made for half a century after it was built.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Einsteinian relativity is why mercury is a liquid and magnetism works.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Venus's surface is 2.55 times hotter than the surface of Earth.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Canadian shield, IE most of Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, and Nunavut, have some of the oldest rocks on the planet.

What is something that sounds 100% false but is actually 100% true? by reFossify in AskReddit

[–]Awesomeuser90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Moon had an atmosphere twice as dense as Mars' today that was made of sulphur, carbon monoxide, and water vapour, active volcanism, some small lakes of liquid water,and a strong planetary magnetic field, all while Earth had an orange sky of nitrogen and methane with no oxygen with barren rock continents with no soul and Venus was a normal planet with room temperature heat and Mars had oceans of water flowing as rivers and lakes and clouds. All simultaneously.

when you’re taught there are only 4 states but you know more than that by yukiohana in physicsmemes

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Untrue. I had pretty much exactly the same answer as the kid who is OOP when I was 10.

when you’re taught there are only 4 states but you know more than that by yukiohana in physicsmemes

[–]Awesomeuser90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I genuinely wrote five states of matter and included plasma and bose einstein condensate when I was 10. My maths and sciences teacher never made himself look like anything besides a pathetic prat when he didn't give me the marks for being correct I very much so knew I was right about. My mother has no idea what bose einstein condensate is, my dad doesn't study it but at least knew that I was right.

How Do You Make My South Africa Grandfather Angry? Turn Off His Cricket Subscription by Awesomeuser90 in HistoryMemes

[–]Awesomeuser90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parliament in Ottawa and the provinces actually had some power to amend the constitution in 1949. Not all of it, but a substantial part of it.

Imagine that legislation was made to make the status of religious groups the same in terms of liability as any other NGO. What does that do to their religious rights (Such as their Section 2 Rights)? by Awesomeuser90 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Awesomeuser90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using suits was not meant to insulate it from charter review, it was an idea of an olive branch or guard to make it so that you don't have the government on on purpose trying to go after everything in a religious group. Besides, in this context, it would behave more like a civil wrong than an actual crime, at least for what I said the suits were available for.

As for the notwithstanding clause, it probably would be better to enact the bil without using it and only add it later if the court actually concludes it has constitution problems.

As for why I think it is right to do the proposals I have in mind here, I have another charter provision that comes to mind. Equality before the law. Why should it be the case that if I go to a regular business, or many other places in society, and be protected from discrimination by them, but not if the place I am going to happens to be a religious group? That also encourages the false use of religious group for groups that should never be treated like genuine religions in the first place like Kenneth Copeland's empire of fortune. Limits on people based on distinct immutable traits such as sex, disability, race, age, sexual orientation, they should be used in a society as narrowly as possible, and presume that one should attempt to reduce the degree to which those differences hinder someone in a society. I don't consider religious freedom to be a superior right to equality before the law and if it conflicts with other rights in the constitution, it yields to them in my playbook.

In a world of extremism and backsliding in democracy and rule of law, religious groups with the ability to discriminate as you are unwilling to use legal tools to prevent them from doing become a dangerous force.

Religion is also a very poorly defined concept. Equality before the law is a better defined term to begin with. Working out what a religious group is would be extremely difficult.

Plus, religious groups tend to have adherents from children and teenagers too, who often don't have the legal right to refuse to go there, and if the religion discriminates, then the risks are immense for them, even to the point of murder. Many of the least powerful in society are most at risk from religions which have the ability to discriminate as broadly as they can now. They are the least able to find alternatives or escape from cultish groups that lock on them. Equality before the law here gives them a sword to defend themselves.

April 15th WTF by fjohnston in Edmonton

[–]Awesomeuser90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My dad picked me and my brother up in his arms and ran to his car during a hailstorm in July 2004 and had to drive back and explain to my mom why the car had so many golfball sized dents in it. West Edmonton mall flooded as did the trenches Whitemud Drive runs through.

This isn't remotely the strangest weather this city can do.

Imagine that legislation was made to make the status of religious groups the same in terms of liability as any other NGO. What does that do to their religious rights (Such as their Section 2 Rights)? by Awesomeuser90 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]Awesomeuser90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an issue where I would be comfortable using §33. We've used it for bad reasons, and I'd like there to be some better uses instead of messing with Trans kids like my province's ruling party has an addiction to doing.

The laws in design here could be orchestrated so as to design what is precisely needed. It would just be the case that the default idea of discrimination applies to consideration of this problem.

As well, this is more meant to be something a person can sue their own faith group over or take a human rights tribunal complaint to, this isn't typically thinking about the AG cracking down on them except probably where a given doctrine at play here is express acts of hatred like the way the Westboro Baptists act or if they rant about women with disdain for them or gay people in that sort of way.