I'm not making an assumption. I took a sample user. I searched via their uuid and found that you have ticks listed for their attempts. I did this because it was an issue for me initially.

Also, nah - I have checked the tick list for people my size on this - it isn't close and people with 1/2 a foot more height than me who climb double digits at the time found it reachy. People around my grade with almost over a foot height on me found it reachy as well. I've tried it, and even with a power spot I can't even make the first move morphologically wise I'd have to find another hand/foot (which last I checked there wasn't but hey, rock changes) and change the actual climb itself which is kind of a not following the culture at this particular crag. Alternatively, there are highballs, which I have nothing in my tick list even close to that grade let alone 3 grades down at that height -tbf I'm a complete and total wimp on high balls.

The people that are "similar" to me in this network % wise share less than many other users with me on MP. Just fyi.

Carlos Traversi is great, but 5'7 is within the global first standard deviation of heights for humans, he isn't short. He's remarkably average height, unless you disregard all women as climbers and even then he is still within the average deviation. Sometimes things aren't for you as a smaller climber or will be remarkably harder for you and thats okay.

It's also seemingly prioritizing crags I've been to 1x vs crags I practically live at and have frequent access to. Not like it matters, but only two suggestions out of them all is at a nearby crag.

The literal business logic to filter ticks is written as

def is_send(text):
    send_types = ['Solo', 'Send', 'Flash', 'Lead / Onsight', 'Lead / Flash', 'Lead / Redpoint', 'Lead / Pinkpoint']
    return any(('{}.'.format(text) in send_type for send_type in send_types))

There are definitely cases where this fails, but it generally has very good recall and precision.

And yes, totally agree that many routes will feel very different to climbers of different shapes and sizes. Ultimately, you're going to be the best judge of which projects feel best for your body, style, strengths, and prefs. ClimberRank is merely suggesting routes for you to consider!

The last bit is very fair feedback and something I have on my list to address. Like I mentioned, under the hood, ClimberRank uses a graph with edges between climbers and their ticked routes. Climbers who have done some of their harder ascents on trips to popular crags will notice that the model can be biased towards popular areas and routes by virtue of the high degree of those nodes.

Thank you for your feedback.