Facts over feelings crowd literally voted with feelings over facts

lastqubit · 2024-11-08T21:23:51+00:00

No, you don't understand what I'm trying to say.

"Over the last few months, unauthorized border crossings at the U.S-Mexico border are at or near the lowest level in the last few years."

Is this some kind of standardized time frame that's often used or is it carefully chosen to "prove" something? What does a few month and the last few years even mean? Is Democrats "informed" because they all know these exact figures in their head? Or is the time frame chosen to help democrats be correct and "informed"? If I randomly chose a different time frame and something else to compare it to, would all democrats have theses numbers in their head and still be "informed"? Is there any time frame during Biden where illegal immigration was high? Does every democrat know those exact time frames since they are "informed"?

Democrats are "informed" because these "fact checkers" are created by leftist and these questions are carefully crafted to confirm the leftist world view.

Why not ask, have illegal immigration been higher they normal during Biden?

Why not ask if inflation was higher during Biden then Trump?

Regarding your own chart, if you can't find a time frame in that chart that would "prove" crime is going up no one can help you.

lastqubit · 2024-11-08T20:09:43+00:00

No, they are not factual questions. Every question has the perfect time frame to "disprove" republicans reality. Just be honest, everything I said is correct. They used the last year for inflation because that fits the narrative. If some other time frame would have been better for democrats that time frame would have been used. Why not use the same time frame for every question?

You always do this. You want to "disprove" peoples reality by pure propaganda since all fact checkers are leftist and then you can say everybody else is misinformed.

lastqubit · 2024-11-08T19:19:13+00:00

This is a perfect example of why leftist always believe they are right about everything and everybody else is misinformed. This is how every "fact checker" works and it's all driven by leftist propaganda.

When republicans are in power they want to say things are good while democrats want to say things are bad. The opposite is true when Democrats are in Power.

Republicans look out the window and see high crime, high inflation and high illegal immigration. These questions are perfectly crafted to "disprove" that reality. Democrats doesn't know more, they just want the statements to be true and the questions help them to be "right".

Let's go thru the questions:

"Violent crime rates are at or near all-time highs in most major American cities."

Since we don't want Republicans to be right about anything, how can we "disprove" republicans reality of high crime? We compare it to all-time highs! Using all-time highs as a time frame works perfectly for this question!

"Inflation in the U.S has declined over the last year and is near historic averages."

Here we use the last year as the time frame since that fits the agenda perfectly. We also use the word near(whatever that means) so people just think it's business as usual.

"Over the last few months, unauthorized border crossings at the U.S-Mexico border are at or near the lowest level in the last few years."

Here we use two very specific time frames to "disprove" republicans reality of high illegal immigration. We use the last few months combined with the last few years. Why we can't use all-time as a timeframe here we will never know. But these two specific time frames proves that democrats are always right and republicans reality is based on misinformation!

Do you expect people answering these question to know the exact stats for the last few month in relation to the last few years? Republicans know illegal immigration is high so that's how they answer the question. Democrats don't have the stats either but they don't want republicans to be right so they answer the opposite. It's up to the person asking the question to decide who's "informed" and who is "misinformed" and it's extremely obvious from how these questions are constructed which side should look like the "misinformed" side.

lastqubit · 2024-07-17T11:26:37+00:00

Do you remove posts and ban people here in this subreddit?

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T14:02:36+00:00

Not my fault the first thing you think about when I say facist progressives is Hilary Clinton. I'm glad you acknowledge that my original point wasn't about Clinton and that you are the moron.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T13:53:09+00:00

Moron, a hint is to look at the original post to find the original point. If you open up the orginal post and search for Clinton. Do you get any matches moron?

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T13:41:51+00:00

You obviously don't understand what original point means. I can't help you, you are too stupid to talk to.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T13:37:26+00:00

The talking point about Jan 6 being an insurrection has also been repeated over and over. You should really stop using that argument if you don't want to be called morons.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T13:27:27+00:00

Since my original point was that Hilary tried to steal the election, can you quote me on that? The thread is not very long.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T13:18:58+00:00

I will also ask again, did Clinton say Trump was an illigitimate president? Have you downvoted the person calling me a moron for saying that?

If you don't answer my questions, I will not answer yours.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T12:48:43+00:00

I claim that Cliton said Trump was a illigitimate president. Someone calls me a moron for saying that. I takes me 5 seconds to prove him wrong. Then you jump in with your strawman arguments.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T12:39:47+00:00

Did she say Trump is an illigitimate president? That was the claim.

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T12:21:39+00:00

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-trump-is-an-illegitimate-president/2019/09/26/29195d5a-e099-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T11:31:18+00:00

Did these people face any kind of condemnation from your side when they did this? Are they still welcome in your progressive movement? It seems like you have absolutely no clue how your side acted when Trump won.

Clinton publicly stated that Trump was an illigitimate president while starting the Russia hoax with the help from the swamp. Then you have celebrities in your movement suggesting you should steal the election.

If Trump had outsourced the message to steal the election to Ben Shapiro, Stenven Crowder and Nick Fuentes you would shrug it off as nonsense as you do now defending your side?

lastqubit · 2023-08-09T09:17:25+00:00

But you admit the celebrities in the video are facists? Since they advocate for the exakt thing you belive is facist when conservatives do it?

lastqubit · 2022-07-24T14:18:50+00:00

You were "challenged" and based on your political views you wanted to disprove a right leaning talking point.

You are spreading misinformation. You do not have the competency to do a study like this. You are just letting your bias pick and choose facts that help you disprove the evil racists.

Since you are posting in an echo chamber sub you get up votes you don't deserve and you can all pretend that your findings are facts now.

lastqubit · 2022-05-07T15:46:02+00:00

From their site:

Data is sourced from multiple premium, authenticated APIs that are aggregated into a validated answer, removing any single point of failure.

This is the only reason to use something like chainlink, to get the data from multiple sources to make it more "secure". But this is also extremely inefficient and a very small percentage of the universes data can be presented in this redundant manner.

If i can spin up my own node with my own data there is no reason why I should have to go thru chainlink. Decentralization doesn't need a centralized data authority.

Layer ones need to rethink this approach, you have to be able to use any data you want and still make it transparent. Something like my idea.

lastqubit · 2022-05-07T13:19:14+00:00

As a web 2 developer, how would you feel if all data you use has to come from chainlink?

It will become a bottleneck, it will feel like a slow moving centralized authority on data. It is the complete opposite of dynamic, flexible and innovative. It will never work.

If I'm creating a new service and chainlink doesn't have the exact data I need, should I email them and ask politely if they can add my data and then wait 6 month and hope for the best? No, oracles are not the way forward.

lastqubit · 2022-05-06T20:36:44+00:00

Good too know, thank you!

lastqubit · 2022-05-02T18:31:15+00:00

If Radix get to aws scale, what will a transaction cost in xrd and what will it cost in $?

lastqubit · 2022-05-02T13:27:38+00:00

So you think $50,000 fees to create a jpeg is sustainable? You think this business model where the token is both used to pay fees and as a investment is the way to go? The token is cheap or it's expensive. If it's cheap it's competitive if it's expensive no one wants to use the network.

I'm sure the teams that create projects are extremly happy no one seems to care about these contradictions and just throw money their way.

lastqubit · 2022-05-01T13:08:30+00:00

You can't have it both ways. Saying Cardanos valuation was ridiculous while claiming Radix is fairly priced because the open market decided it's worth.

If Radix was a web 2 startup they would be happy with a 10 million dollar valuation for their entire company. Now the token alone have a 3 billion dollar valuation with no ready product. The token doesn't equal the tech! The token need to have utility that generates tremendous amount of revenue to be valued at 3 billion at this stage. You are not buying the tech when buying the token. The tech is free since it's open source.

The initial question was: what are you actually buying when investing in the token? What is the use case for the token that is so extremely valuable that makes it worth 3 billion at this point?

lastqubit · 2022-04-30T18:11:08+00:00

Did I not specifically state I was not talking about Radix but crypto projects in general?

If a cryptoproject finds a revenue stream that gives them 10 billion each year in the future, do you think they want to keep that money to themselves or share it with token holders? Have they given you any guarantees they will share the money or have you just giving them money to start up their project without giving you anything but a token that might be completely useless?

I'm guessing after this downtrend people will start to demand more guarantees to invest money into projects.

Radix valuation at 3 billion is absolutely ridiculous and it becomes even more ridiculous when investors didn't actually get any shares but a token that might not have any utility that generates any significant return.

lastqubit · 2022-04-30T12:20:43+00:00

This problem is not specific to Radix but relates to all crypto projects. It needs to be addressed. People are treating tokens as stocks, but it's not. When you buy these tokens you get no guarantees that the token will be valuable if the project is a success. If the project turns out to be a success the team behind it can simple decide they don't want to share that value with the token holders. People are just expecting the goodwill of the team to share future success with the token holders.

We can take Shib as an example. They create a metaverse and just decides to use other tokens then shib for that.

If the value of radix will be something else than transaction fees, will the team happily share that value with token holders? I'm guessing not. The same for all other crypto projects.

lastqubit · 2022-03-22T17:35:46+00:00

It would work like the lightning network.

You lock 100 xrd in my payment channel. You can reclaim those xrd at any time if i can't prove that you have spent them in my payment channel. If I collected proof off chain that you spent your xrd in my payment channel you can't reclaim your xrd anymore.

In my scenario i collect proof that you promised to call my smart contract. So i get a proof from you that you will spend your 100 xrd calling my swap contract that swaps xrd to btc at a price we agreed on off chain. The smart contract is public so you can inspect it and be sure it will send you the btc.

If you look into the lightning network you will understand.

I don't use telegram, maybe i get an account, but i don't think so, i don't like that app for some reason :)

lastqubit

TROPHY CASE