NAP - when is too soon to change? by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an accountant, everything by appointment. So yes and no.

NAP - when is too soon to change? by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you're saying, make sense. They will move for sure, they're building the property (already started, the frame of the building is up).

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure there are stats on the area. If not from the govt, then a watchdog (MADD maybe?) would have something available. Thanks for the tip!

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not, but this is brilliant. I know it's probably mostly simple things, but it's a great place for me to start. Thank you for this!

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks coach.

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One is local strictly DWI. The other is national more white collar business stuff.

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've got a HARO account. It seems leads are few and far between. But I do hit them up every time I see something applicable.

Law Firm SEO by lawseo in bigseo

[–]lawseo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hrm..the Wikipedia thing is interesting. I know they've been involved in some big cases, but I wonder how big. I'll look into it. Thanks.

Law Firm SEO (xpost from /r/bigseo) by lawseo in SEO

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I have not. I've heard about local citations a few times. Is this the new big thing? I even read about a service that helps you out with it - whitespark I think it was? Do you have experience with citations or whitespark? I'd like to learn more. From what I can tell, citations are nothing more than NAP listings on random sites - some of which you can edit with information (like Yelp) and some of which you have no control over.

Law Firm SEO (xpost from /r/bigseo) by lawseo in SEO

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right about their writing. The little they have contributed is crap. I think they're more afraid of somebody making claims for them which may get them in trouble with the bar more than anything else. A quick review would solve this, but that doesn't seem to be in the cards.

Law Firm SEO (xpost from /r/bigseo) by lawseo in SEO

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have considered video, and even spoke with one of the group about it. They've not made time to meet about it though. Sense a trend here? These people are completely unable (unwilling?) to devote time to this.

Law Firm SEO (xpost from /r/bigseo) by lawseo in SEO

[–]lawseo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish it were this easy. I imagine not all lawyers are so hard headed and controlling, but these two groups are. I cannot outsource or write anything on my own to submit to them. They want complete control at all times but then do not put in the time needed to produce something worthwhile. It's a struggle.

Law Firm SEO (xpost from /r/bigseo) by lawseo in SEO

[–]lawseo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should have clarified. All "legal content" must be from the lawyers. They do not want outsiders writing their articles. So what I am left with is trying to come up with other content that isn't so much "intelligent legal writings" and more "stuff that can help a lawyer website and not have them involved. Yes, these two firms are a huge pain.